Privacy Policy
A: Mark J. I take no offense, but I won't allow readers to ask questions that dis questions from other readers. Such comments are standard business on Reddit, but on Ask Aaron I reserve that privilege for myself.
Q: Okay... in all seriousness, I've come to make a rather unfortunate announcement. I won't be finishing the RA2 models for Robotica seasons 2 and 3. My reasons are pretty extensive and complex, but since I don't want to use this website as my own personal blog (again), let's keep a long story short and say "I don’t find Robot Arena 2 to be that fun anymore". If anyone wants to continue the series in my place, please be my guest!
A: Sorry, but I also won't allow unfortunate announcements on Ask Aaron -- particularly if the announcement is not put in the form of a question. I would have deleted your announcement but my delete key finger is worn out from removing your opening question. I'll get around to it later.
Q: Because I'm sure you and others were waiting for the next installment, I figured it wouldn’t be right for me to leave it at that. So, as a "Thank you for putting up with me" award, I've gathered some .stl files for Hexbugs I made back in 2023. We've got: ---
Abbatoir's spinner ---
Darkness's pickax & weapon mount ---
Nuts 2's Ring --- and finally
the shell of Spinning Mayhem
(with options to print in separate pieces, or all together)!
A: Yea, maybe I'm just being picky today but I don't think I should allow Ask Aaron to be used as a parking lot for .stl files. I mean there are lots of sites that do nothing but host 3D print files and... oh never mind. I'll find space to cram them onto my server, but if you want these files you'd better download them fast before I find a better use for the space. Here they are in a single .zip: Iceywave's 3D Hexbug files.
Q: And as a bonus, here’s a gif I made of NHRL's mascot, Sparky!
P.S. I have a couple more exciting things I’m working on. Stay tuned…
A: Hmmm... I'm not sure how an animated gif of an robot combat event mascot fits into the Ask Aaron Mission Statement. If I start accepting cute gifs the whole page might fill up with cartoon cats, bears, and penguins. I'm gonna allow it this time, but I'm gonna make it pretty small and add a really ugly border.
A: Mark J. How about, "Vanishing Creativity". It works for all weight classes.
Q: Vanishing Creativity sounds super cool. Now I want help with those spinners. I was thinking of using the motors that drive stuff like r/c drones, and holding them on with nylon & rubber bands. My budget is negative 50 dollars(I owe my friends some money).
A: Spinner motors can be expensive, but I have a trick that will keep you on budget. Just give the weapon a good spin with your finger when you put the 'bot in the arena. It'll spin for a long time. Duct tape is good for holding stuff onto other stuff, but be sure to use the sticky side.
Then there’s the issue of speed. I want to OBLITERATE every bot! If I go antweight size, I bet 500 to 1000 miles per hour would do great. I'm gonna buy parts from Canada, but they don't use miles pers hours. How much kilometers an hour do I need?
A: Miles-per-hour (MPH) and kilometers-per-hour (KPH) are both old fashioned. The mega-cool builders specify speed in furlongs-per-fortnight (FPF). You can very easily attain huge numbers with these units: an average antweight tops out at better than 14,784 FPF!
Q: Sorrey. Parents phone broke. Laptop dont have atocorrect. Taked with sister. She said "GO HOME OR GO BIG!" So thats what Im doing. For 250 pound robot, would motors from pikup truck work? Buget now negativ 100 dollers(lost bet at skool. Need new frendz)
A: Depends. Did the truck work?
Q: Good news, phone is now fixed! The last time that truck was driven was 30 years ago. I’m assuming it works still.
I was thinking also about using a baseball bat for a backup weapon, in case the flipper breaks. Are bats allowed on BattleBots?
A: Dude, baseball bats must be illegal 'cause I never see 'bots using them, and honestly, who wouldn't wanna rock a sick weapon like that?
Update: Sorry, but Vanishing Creativity is no longer being built. Getting that baseball bat inspired me to start playing. Turns out I'm uber good! At my first day of practice, I scored 32 touchdowns and 16 layups!! Now I'll try for scholarship money. Turns out I won’t need to become a world famous robot builder after all.
Since October 11th, 2023 I've received a few messages from people that I know who want me to send their questions to you. I'm not sure why they don't just send you the questions directly, but either way, here they are...
A: Turn right out the front door of Dave's Hot Chicken on Flamingo Road and take the skyway over to the Horseshoe. Walk past the SciFi Wedding Chapel, keep going thru Sully's Bar, and take the first right after Nathan's Famous Hot Dogs. Just before you get to the fitness center there is a door on the left marked 'Housekeeping'. Go thru that door, down the stairs, and out the fire exit at the bottom. Walk under the elevated monorail track and across the employee parking lot. The big white building in front of you is the BattleBots Destruct-A-Thon stadium. Knock three times on the blue door, tell whoever answers that you're delivering Dave's Hot Chicken for Trey, and they'll let you right in. Did I mention that's why you start at the chicken place? You'll need three orders, extra hot.
A: European or Persian? Look, lots of us eat grass and travel in herds. Not all of us identify as hemione, but if that's your choice ain't anybody here gonna tamp down on you. Consider this a safe place, and be careful charging your LiPos.
A: Intentions are simple -- actual protection takes work.
A: You've done better than most builders. Put your award on the mantelpiece. Take a slightly out of focus picture of the award and put it on Insta. Make a video of yourself dancing on your robot and set it up on TikToc. Update your resume to mention "Award Winning Robot Builder".
A: It's true, I have no regrets. Would do again.
Thank you for hosting my page for the past year! I hope to look back on this many years from now and say "This is where my comedy writing first began".
-sincerely, Iceywave : )
A: Mark J. You're welcome. Remember: every comedian needs a straight man -- and the straight man gets 60% of the take.
A: Mark J. I dislike giving imprecise answers here at Ask Aaron. As the square root of 24 is a non-repeating non-terminating irrational number the best precise answer I can provide is the simplified radical form: √24 = √(2×2×6) = 2√6
If you prefer imprecise: √24 = not quite five.
In the Robotica Competitor Gallery, 'Ill Tempered Mutt' and 'PSHHHT!' have incorrect links for their wiki pages. I've attached the correct links.
A: Mark J. Hey, you're pretty good at this. I could sack that annoying rodent and give you his job. It comes with a water bottle, an exercise wheel, and a fresh scoop of alfalfa pellets every other day -- but you have to clean your own cage. Interested?
Q: And a commenter on Ill Tempered Mutt's page said that a robot of the same name tried to enter Robot Wars in 2017 but failed to qualify. I’ve never heard of this supposed robot before. Have you?
-sincerely, Iceywave
A: The Robot Wars Wiki lists an 'Ill Tempered Mutt' from Team Underdog that attempted to qualify for both the 9th and 10th Wars. It was a thwackbot with a horizontal circular saw in its long tail.
- Matt Robinson, Team Underdog on Facebook
Reply: Mark J. Awesome, Icey!
For readers unfamiliar with the origin of the Iceywave era at "Ask Aaron", Icy decided to honor every single combat robot he could think of on his 2023 ballot to select members in the Combat Robot Hall of Fame. It was the largest ballot ever submitted, and it will remain the largest because it prompted me to institute "The Iceywave Rule" that will severely limit ballot size in future elections. For some reason Icey takes a great deal of pride in this accomplishment.
To celebrate the anniversary of his bloated ballot, Icy has gifted us his new series of playable Robotica competitor robots to upload into the popular Robot Arena 2: Design and Destroy action video game for Windows. The new robots may be downloaded from the Team Run Amok Robot Arena: Design and Destroy page, along with the thirty-seven robots from his previous three series.
A: Rodger is out of control. The furry little bugger has taken to tacking his own opinions onto the end of some of my answers, and he has demanded a two-week vacation this year on very short notice. I gave him your ballot before he left with very clear instructions that it was to be uploaded before he could go, but I just now found it in the pile of litter next to his javascript manual.
I've personally uploaded your ballot and the link is now active and correct. I really must have a talk with Rodger when he returns.
A: Let not your left hand know what your right hand has given.
However, I will point out that shortly after he received his prize, Draco shuttered BattleBots Update and is rumored to have retired and moved to the south of France. Must have been some prize, huh?
A Few Days Later...
Q: Because I’m a stickler for details, I have a couple of questions about two Robotica season 1 competitors before I finish their virtual Robot Arena 2 models.
-sincerely, Iceywave
A: Mark J. For the sake of accuracy:
I noticed you grouped Jeff Haas' Run Amok model with my Robotica replicas. I thought having it next to the 11 other robots I built felt a bit out of place, so I modified Jeff’s replica to have better ground clearance!
I’m REALLY proud of how this batch turned out. Look out for season two bots coming later in August.
A: Thanks for the 'Run Amok' update. I wanted to drop it in to complete the set of Robotica 'Fight to the Finish' competitors so your version is most welcome. This group of Robotica 'bots does look great!
P.S. I noticed that my model of 'Run Away' can do the iconic 'gyro dance'. Could the real life bot do that?
A: Gyro dances are annoying -- I try to avoid them. 'Run Away' has a single electric motor chain driving a differential gearset that allots power to the two rear wheels. If either rear wheel lifts, the differential will cut power to the other wheel and drop the 'bot back onto a level footing. No 'gyro dance' is possible -- even with a monster spinner weapon.
NOTE: A gyro dance lifts the OUTSIDE wheels in a turn. Run Away appears to be lifting the inside wheels. Is this a flaw in the RA2 simulation engine? Is the 'bot backing up? Regardless, Run Away can't hold a lifted wheel.
A: Best luck to you in your chosen path, Icey. In an odd coincidence, I've just recently realized that I have never been a good fit with mechanical and electrical design. I've always known in the back of my mind that I was cut out to be an animal herder. I've ordered a crook from Etsy and I got a good price on some goats from Temu. I hope the instruction manual is readable. Shipping the goats from China will take a while so I plan to keep Ask Aaron active until they arrive. Looking forward to my new life. I wonder what a goat smells like? I've heard good things.
Q: I still have one more BIG post I want to share, plus another batch of RA2 bots to celebrate the one year anniversary of my enormous CRHoF ballot. See you there...
- sincerely, Iceywave : )
A: Please tell me that you aren't building a Robot Arena 2 virtual robot for each of the one-hundred-seventeen 'bots listed on your 2023 Combat Robot Hall of Fame ballot. I swear that I'll go buy local goats to avoid that.
I've built 24 models of BattleBot competitors young and old in Robot Arena 2. Your job is to guess what bots they're supposed to be. I'm eager to see if anyone can get all of them!
I'll post the answers on July 2nd @ 2:00 p.m. central time. Any submissions that come after that won’t count.
A: Mark J. I made a new page for your BattleBots 25th Anniversary Celebration Contest to keep it from getting lost. I'll collect entries and score the results for you.
A: Mark J. Thank you, Icey. I spent the last two hours finding and correcting half a dozen effected links in the Ask Aaron FAQ and the archives. All good now..
A proper webmaster leaves a trail of breadcrumbs and redirects when they 'revamp' a website such that visitors following an old link will be treated better than being dumped into a generic '404 Page' or an unexpected menu system. Anything less is sloppy - just saying.
A: Mark J. The answer requires a little background. When Team Run Amok was invited back for RWEW-2, I sat down and drew up plans for 'The Gap' as our entry. I took the sketches and dimensions over to Max Chapin at 'Creative Steel' who had done the major metalwork on 'Run Amok' and her conversion into 'Run Away'. We had started pulling together components and materials when I got another call from Robot Wars saying that they were looking for a few more competitors. I said I'd call them back in 20 minutes. I looked over at 'Run Away', scratched my head, and called Max Chapin to see if he and his family would like a free trip to England to take over driving duties for the old girl. You know what his answer was.
Max worked his metal magic and turned my dimensions and angles into the beautiful curved tube structure of the pneumatic lifter platform. As we got closer to crating up the 'bots to ship them off I became a little uneasy about turning Run Away over to new hands. 'The Gap' had come together well and was by far the easier of the two 'bots to drive. Given that I had plenty of experience operating 'Run Away' it made sense to give Team Creative Steel their better shot by running 'The Gap'.
For the proposed RWEW-3 tournament the plan was for Team Run Amok to reclaim 'The Gap' and for Team Creative Steel to put together a new 'bot of their own design. Thru the spring I worked on wringing more speed and power from The Gap's high-lifter weapon, which I was able to show-off at the DaVinci Days technology fair and the Oregon Clandestine Street Fight. Rumors kept flying about a third Extreme Warriors, but confirmation never came.
Creative Steel never settled on the design for their new 'bot so I can't speculate on its chances against the new house 'bots -- but I was very disappointed that 'The Gap' had a house bot straddling its lift platform at RWEW-2 and couldn't actuate the weapon due to an electrical issue. I would have loved a chance to put another house 'bot out there -- the bigger the better.
A: Mark J. I say you'd want the Destruct-A-Thon Tazbot in the video game 'cause snakes have no armpits.
Q:
A: Mark J. For more than twenty years I've badly wanted a model of Robotica mascot "Shrapnel", like the one the young fan was carrying in the TV commercial where Shrapnel is signing autographs.
-sincerely, Iceywave
A: Mark J. I assume that you are basing your assesment of Ask Aaron's vitality on my previously posted chart showing the number of questions answered on Ask Aaron over time -- but "questions answered" is not the measure of website success.
Below is a chart showing the relative number of unique visits to Ask Aaron per calendar year for the last nineteen years (I consider the absolute numbers proprietary). As you can see, 2023 was the top year for visits in the history of the website. No doubt people flocked here to read your posts.
A: Mark J. Awesome.
Q: Speaking of the weapon motor, I found this one at Hobby Lobby and wondered if it would work for different fairyweight design (like a horizontal spinner). It weighs 30 grams, which is a bit overkill for a 150g bot, but I was still wanting to know your opinion.
A: Go for it. Use five of them.
I don't have a question, more a curiousity; I'm interested to learn how the typical electronics circuit (or wiring layout? Not sure the correct term) of heavyweight robots has changed over time, and why older ways of doing things made sense at the time. (I'm still trying to get my head around why early bots used servos and microswitches instead of speed controllers, for example...)
Do you fancy indulging me with a brief history? - TJ
A: Mark J. Thank you for your kind appreciation. To paraphrase Blaise Pascal: I would like to have written a brief history on this topic, but I only had time to write something a bit too long.
You could pop down to your local hobby shop and buy (at some considerable cost) a hobby aircraft twin-stick 72 MHz R/C transmitter/receiver set with servos and a small NiCad battery pack. You would then send off the set to a service that would (for further cost) convert it to the 75 MHz 'surface radio' frequency to make it legal for use with your robot. In the UK I believe you could simply purchase a 50 MHz system that was acceptable for robot use. Plus one for the UK.
Once you had the R/C gear, the next challenge was interfacing controllers to the radio output. The only electronic motor controllers capable of speed and directional control of DC electric motors that were powerful enough to push around large combat robots came from sources like golf carts, miniature ride-on trains, camera dollies, and industrial applications. Few of these controllers would accept the output from a hobby remote control receiver as an input, and designing an interface was beyond the capability of most robot builders.
In the US you could purchase motor controllers with R/C interfaces from Vantec, a company that had ties to special effects builders in the movie industry, but they were expensive. A two-channel reversible motor controller rated 60 amps continuous per channel was $500 -- more than $1000 inflation adjusted to 2024. These had no over-current protection and when abused (as often happens in robot combat) they would fail abruptly and without warning. The 4QD motor controllers from the UK were much more sophisticated, but it took some time before R/C interfaces for them became available.
Simple on/off control of motors, actuators, and pneumatic valves was also a problem. R/C interfaced electric switches/relays were uncommon, often unreliable, and (wait for it...) expensive. You may recall I mentioned above that R/C transmitter/receiver sets of the day came with R/C servos. If you bought a 6-channel set you got six servos. It did not take long for some unknown and desperate robot builder to look at that stack of servos and decide to use one to mechanically trigger a pair of microswitches. See also: Solenoid Control of Combat Robots
Why did these strange and primitive ways of doing things make sense at the time? They made sense because they worked and we had no affordable alternative solutions. Builders today have it easy.
A: I'm not going to dig thru last year's Combat Robot Hall of Fame voting to find your ballot and re-score it. As I recall it took me some considerable effort to do that the first time. There WILL be a maximum ballot size in 2025.
From memory I believe you cast separate votes for a few robots from the same team in different weight classes that would be considered a single robot for purposes of The Hall, like featherweight 'Huge' and heavyweight 'HUGE!'. Those votes would have been combined as a vote for a single robot in the tally. See CRHoF Eligibility for clarification.
- SpoopyVex029
A: Mark J. Here are a few methods I have used to fix things:
Q: After a lengthy discussion with my "friend" I have come to the exact conclusion that I have not given enough information about my robot.
And don't listen to this 'Iceywave' character. I have known him since he claimed to make his 'IceyBots' series back in the summer of 2021. He told me specifically, "Vex, it's not good to complain about a bot you built in one day to someone you found on page 40 of Google." but did I listen?
A: Page 40 of Google? We've really slipped -- we used to be on page 28.
Since it's already painted orange, take it to Afghanistan and tell someone you're there for 'Platypus Day'. They will smile and set fire to your 'bot. If there is water in your boiler this should generate enough steam to get it working. Don't let them throw it into the river.
It must be very crowded in your friend's head. Say hello to Mistro Deb Hamper for me.
We've got...
Middleweights: 'South Bay Mauler' and 'X1'.
Heavyweights: 'Doolittle', 'Ramfire', 'The Beetle', 'The Master' (both weapon choices!), 'Tiny Tim', 'TMZ', and the reserve 'Bloodletter'!
Thanks for keeping this site running. Here's to the next 30 years!
A: [Mark J] YOU CAN NOT BE SERIOUS! Did you actually do this? All sixteen competitors - plus a second weapon option and an alternate - from the inaugural 1994 US Robot Wars event rendered as fully operational and playable Robot Arena 2 'bots?? I can now entirely re-enact the first recognized combat robot event on the planet???
Pause while head spins...
I am flabbergasted. I've added the images and botfile links to a new section of the Robot Arena: Design and Destroy - Downloadable Models page.
1. What's the most questions you've received in a day? What's the longest you've gone without receiving any?
A: [Mark J] I don't track day-by-day question numbers. The closest I come is the graph posted down at the bottom of the Ask Aaron Anniversary page that I last updated about a year ago. You can see on the graph that in 2010 Ask Aaron averaged nearly three questions per day:
A: I never received any feedback on Clickbait Month. Nobody said they liked it, nobody said they hated it, and nobody linked to it. The concept slowly changed into theShort Post TitlesI put above each question.
A: No, but I'll tell you what I do wonder about. When I warned "Texas" about having a very poor chance of being selected for BattleBots with an "it's been done" bar spinner design, his reply was:
A: I've never owned JJJS; I have a long-term lease thru 2028 with an option to renew.
A: I resampled your earlier model pics to 200 by 150 pixels for the Robot Arena: Design and Destroy - Downloadable Models page.
A: Mark J. How very kind of you, Icey -- offering to help a doddering septuagenarian find his way around the mysteries of modern web graphics. Are you working on your "Aiding the Elderly" merit badge?
A: Well, you're in danger of violating General Order #17, but if you give it a little thought I'm sure you can avoid it.
P.P.S. - I’m not working on a merit badge, I just like helping people! To be honest, I didn’t know what use the SVG for either. I just thought it looked cool!
A: I may have found the perfect use for the SVG. How about a T-shirt?
Reply: I love it! Just put the Ask Aaron logo on top and I think we have a bestselling product.
What would I need to prepare for a Robotica day/night/week and treat it like the NCAA tournament and NCAA championship and various other superbowl events and have you ever heard of Sling TV well Mech Plus is in Sling TV [Erskine, Scotland ☆]
A: Mark J. If you're going to have 'Robotica Week' you should have the whole experience. You need a week-long virtual tournament.
Robotica, Baby! (audio)
Day 1 Send me an application to be accepted to participate in Robotica Week. Include pictures of any mechanical devices you have made, any special dietary requirements you have, your blood type, your credit rating, and a 500 word essay on why you would make a good Robotica Week contestant. Wait around the rest of the day for my reply, which will arrive at 11:55 PM.
Day 2 Download the rules and construction requirements. Your robot design is due at midnight. Spend the day designing a robot to meet the challenges as described in the rule set. About 9:00 PM I will send you a revised rule set that will make your design unsuitable. Start a pot of strong coffee, revise your design, and send it in at 11:59 PM.
Day 3 Prepare a detailed parts list with prices and weights. Discover that two vital parts are no longer available and that your design is 40 pounds overweight. Your weapon for the 'Fight to the Finish' is changed from a hydraulic crusher to an electric screwdriver spinning a #11 X-ACTO blade. At 11:59 PM you send me the spreadsheet and PayPal me 10% of the total 'bot budget as your entry fee.
Day 4 Go to the airport and pretend to fly to a destination 1000 miles away. When enough time has passed, get a taxi and check in to a moderately priced hotel near an industrial area. Wander around in the industrial area and find an abandoned warehouse where you will spend Day 5 and Day 7.
Day 5 At 8:30 AM you may download the virtual version of your robot provided by a talented teenager in Texas. You have 30 minutes to learn how to drive it. At 9:00 AM qualifying starts on a previously unrevealed obstacle course. We didn't mention qualifying in the rule set? Really sorry. Top 24 qualifiers are paired off for the tournament. Everybody else goes home.
Day 6 You have the day off. Watch "The Big Cheese" episode of Dexter's Laboratory on the hotel TV. Go to an amusement park and eat greasy fast food. Get on a roller coaster and wish you hadn't eaten the greasy fast food. Get some take-out Thai food for dinner and return to your hotel room.
Day 7 The six finalists are paired off in any way I feel like pairing them.
A: Mark J. Woah! It's already too easy to get a complete set. How about I remove the individual download links and put up a random and unspecified "Mystery Bot" to download each day? I could make a couple of them 'holographic rare' and only have them crop up every month or two.
I'm surprised I didn't think of this earlier. This marketing strategy works great for collectable card games like Pokémon and Yu-Gi-Oh! I'll get to work on the code. Better hurry and download a set now if you want to do it the easy way!
A: Mark J. That's rather a personal question. I'm not sure that I want the general public to know if I like REDACTED or not. The answer is a qualified "yes", but don't spread it around.
A: Mark J. 'SomeRandomDude' has been very busy on YouTube. In addition to the playlist you found, there are additional playlists for:
Q: And since I have seen the Run Away model sheet I might create two sheets of Run Away v1.0 the spinning rotor blades to add to my Run Amok model to create... Super Run Amok!
A: I've added the 'Run Away v1.0' paper model and weapon detail sheets to the Run Amok Paper Model page to make them easy to find.
'Super Run Amok' came very close to reality. As you know, Team Run Amok received a VERY late invitation to compete in Robotica season three. We would have needed an active weapon to meet the rules for that event and given the very short notice that weapon would have been Run Away's "side wheel" weapon strapped to the top of Run Amok. We just couldn't find a way to pack up, travel the 900 miles to Hollywood in 18 hours, and arrive ready to compete. We had to turn down the invitation.
A: Mark J. Sorry, but all of your nominations are already in the "Completely Random Handbag of Favorites" (CRHoF). You really should check their website before you submit your ballot.
I may consider revisiting this one day, but I think 12 robots is a good place to stop for now. I hope everyone else has as much fun with these bots as I did!
Reply: Mark J. Iceywave has been busy in the 'Extreme Warriors' arena. Icey's playable Robot Arena 2 'bot models for the following Robot Wars Extreme Warriors 'bots are now available for download from the Team Run Amok Virtual Robots page:
Q: Are your robots ready for the solar eclipse?
A: Hacienda Run Amok was smack in the path of totality for the 2017 eclipse. I still have protective goggles for all the 'bots, so we'll be fine.
A:
A: All of a sudden my two most prolific contributors each have an interest in a paper 'Run Away' model.
Run Amok's design made it possible for me to create an accurate scale model in a simple cut-and-fold paper format. Run Away's top-mounted weapon for both the "long top" version from Robot Wars Extreme Warriors season 1 and the "bare top" version from season 2 creates a problem. I have to choose between "complex to construct" or "inaccurate".
The best I can do is to provide a detailed robot base 'bot that you might be able to set your own weapon mount (Lego?) on top to get an acceptable model:
I've provided a short dashed line across the wide red stripe to indicate the correct position for the weapon axle.
Two Days Hard Work Later...
A: Mark J. There never were design drawings for the version 1.0 weapon. My metal fabricator cut and welded the support cradle on the fly around my drive train and shaft. I went down to my workshop and found the weapon cradle from version 1.0 of Run Away and measured the components that had been scavenged for the version 2.0 weapon, which hangs intact on the workshop wall.
I gave the version 1.0 top armor to a local fan years ago, but the weapon mounting points were easy to estimate from photos. The weapon drive is a 4:1 sprocket and chain reduction with the lower portion of the large sprocket obtaining clearance from a cut-out in the top armor. Send me a photo when you're done.
A: What's purple, fuzzy, Italian, and sucks blood? Is it a moldy vampire grape from Naples? No, it's a playable model of Robot Wars loanerbot 'Zanzara' for Robot Arena 2! Zanzara (Italian for 'mosquito') was Team Run Amok's tag team partner at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors season 2. The RA2 version could open up a whole new category of Robot Arena collectables. It's great! Download it here.
You correctly made the Italian mosquito very purple, but your RA2 version seems to be upside-down. Can you fix that? Maybe 'Diotoir' can help? I do wonder which of the current builds of RA2 are you using to create your replicas...
Response: The robot fighting Zanzara is meant to be 'Bigger Brother', not Diotoir... though I guess they do look a little similar now that you mention it.
The version of RA2 I use is '1.4' which is readily available for download here.
Comment: That explains why 'Diotoir' has no spots! It looked kinda orange and I took those white blobs as eyes. Maybe we should call it 'Brother Diotoir'?
Counterpoint: Those white blobs are actually the wheels! I made that build back in 2021, before I started using 'component freedom' which can be downloaded here.
Retort: Not the big white blobs; the little white blobs at the tops of the weapon arms look like eyes on short stalks to me. I must have been looking too long at Zanzara's eyes.
Epilogue: It’s been quite an eventful day, now time to get back to season 3.0 of IceyBots!
A: Mark J. Wow! Click Here for a full analysis of your designs.
Q: Will you also give me step by step instructions on how to bind my model airplane to its transmitter? Thank You!
A: Sure.
Happy Anniversary! -sincerely, Iceywave☆
A: Mark J. Thanks, Icey! We can't let a few megabytes come between friends. Let's try this:
There, that wasn't so hard. Let's see what we've got here... Whoa, thanks, Icey! I've embedded your video recreation of the Robotica 'Fight to the Finish' below, and tossed a copy onto my YouTube channel.
Reply: I'm happy to hear you enjoyed my video! Turns out the file I sent was actually 59 megabytes. The original recording was 56 mbs, but I had to put it through some editing software to add fade in/fade out on the video. The models of Juggerbot and Ram Force were built by myself, in case you were wondering. I also have a big surprise coming April 1st, so be prepared! -see you April 1st, Iceywave☆
A: Mark J. For those who prefer to read:
Wow, our first audio question and our first 1.4 megabyte commercial for somebody's YouTube channel! It seems a shame to answer your early April Fool question in regular text, so I went with Morse code:
Respuesta: Mark J. He examinado cuidadosamente tu fotografìa y no veo nada malo. Quita las ruedas y la Liga Nacional de Robots Havoc te darà una bonificaciòn de peso.
A: Mark J. The last Volkswagen I owned was a 1964 Beetle that wouldn't do 78 MPH if you nailed the throttle pedal to the floor and pushed it off a cliff.
A: Mark J. It makes me wonder what else I might have done with all the time I've spent answering combat robot questions.
Q: Also, I seriously don't know when I’ll start my YouTube channel. Things have gotten really backed up on my video production pipeline, so that late-January channel creation date I mentioned a while back will definitely not happen.
Before I go, there’s one more thing that's been on my mind. What is the most successful multibot ever made (by 'most successful' I mean the greatest win/loss ratio)?
-sincerely, Iceywave
A: Assuming that you're interested in traditional multi-bots and not a lopsided heavyweight/minibot combinations, UK clusterbots appear to have had the most overall success. Win/loss records for UK robots are complicated by their appearances in events other than two-bot battles, but I believe the title for "Most Successful" goes to the Robot Wars flipper twins 'Gemini'. Their 4 win, 5 loss record includes victories in the Series 4 Pinball Warrior Tournament and a three-bot quailifying fight. 'Gemini' also won Series 4 awards for Best Design and Most Original Entry.
A: Mark J. I usually put them in a purple box, from which there is no escape.
A: Mark J. Yes I did find humor in your credits for "BattleBots the Movie", but I had to scroll many pages down thru the VERY tall image to enjoy the funny. The image is longer than the credit rolls for the "Lord of the Rings" movies! Ask Aaron General Order #26 states:
Q: I want to ask a question, but I thought I might jump on the cockney bandwagon so...
A: I've grown tired of cockney, so I'll answer in Welch...
Reply: Once again you suggest that I replace something in one of your posts with an uninteresting substitute. You should know me better by now. I'll replace {something incomprehensibly random}, but not with '???'.
A: Mark J. A good list, Erskine. I have a few audio files on my Robotica Sound Clips page, but I may need to add a some from your list to the collection. Here's my favorite:
Q: I like the transcript if someone has the Robotica episode with the subtitles and/or without the subtitles keep me posted and picture this: if Robotica the fan series does get released what do you think would happen if the fan series is a success?
A: I like you, Erskine. Your questions make my answers seem like they make sense.
Why wouldn't Robotica the Fan Series be released? You've already made a teaser video and you have the tournament brackets figured out. You've got the rest under control, right? I'm not sure how you define success, but if you make yourself happy by completing the Fan Series I'd consider that a success. Then you can carry that success forward to start another project.
Here is a link to download a zipped file with all nine of the Robotica transcripts I have in MS Word .doc format: Robotica Transcripts.
Q: Unusually I tried to get into the other Robotica transcripts and I keep getting a 404 message. Nuisances.
A: My fault. Rodger the Web Hamster had the night off and I miss-typed the link. Fixed now.
Speaking of IceyBots, I'm just about to conclude the filming for the season 3.0 (yes, I decided to film 2 ADDITIONAL SEASONS before I finished editing season 1.0!) lightweight division! Here's the bracket for the season 3.0 lightweights. I would like to know who you think will win, Mark.
1) Ziggo vs. 16) Lemon Jello
8) Sisyphus vs. 9) Trilobot
5) Texas Stampede vs. 12) Sublime
4) Slap Pest vs. 13) Manic Aggressive
2) Shaft vs. 15) Whirl WepX25
7) Blood Dragon vs. 10) Fang
6) Gamma Raptor vs. 11) Whirligig
3) Wedge of DOOM vs. 14) Centipede
And sorry for taking so long to make those paper models. I want to maintain a consistent upload schedule once I get my channel started, so I've been really busy making sure I have enough content before hand.
But before I go, I was actually going to send one of my videos to you! It's a short about the history of autonomous combat robots. The problem? The .zip file containing the video is still 94 Megabytes! My iPad doesn't like when I try to upload large files, so I have to send it another time.
-sincerely, Iceywave
A: Mark J. I'm all in on 'Centipede', Icy. I like the way the bracket breaks for them. All they have to do is walk [on their tiny metal feet] by three of the four greatest lightweights of the period [where is Hall of Fame lightweight 'Dr. Inferno Jr.'?] and they have it made.
Maybe you could upload your video to YouTube as a private file and send me the link -- less danger of having your iPhone complaining?
Q: Please rename everything inside these symbols { } to "redacted" on the website, 'cause I don't want any readers to get the championship spoiled for them.
A: What fun is that? I'd much rather use Mad Libs to fill in the redacted spaces. Here we go...
Be ready for the middleweight bracket {When Pigs Fly}! The first Main Event? {The London Philharmonic} vs {The Mormon Tabernacle Choir}.
A: Have you noticed that I found a sponsor for the "How to Troll Team Run Amok - Part 3" section of "The Iceywave Troll" page? You should have a look -- load the page and hit refresh.
A: Mark J. Yes, I know the fellow who got the Robotica VHS tape. He lives in Oregon and runs a combat robot question and answer website. I believe he has some connection to Robotica. See more information four posts down the page.
After the final episode of Robotica Season 1 aired on TLC we received email congratulations from female fans, but I can't say if Run Amok had more or fewer women rooting for her than did the other teams. Not sure how we would know. The builder of 'Killer B' had his daughter with him at Robotica, so perhaps that carried some weight in the gender balance?
I'm always happy to see recreations of the Robotica arenas. I notice that your teaser video says "40 Robots" but the seeding list you sent separately (not published here) has 24 robots. I also wonder why you have the Robotica Season 3 champion seeded so low at #8. Keep me up to date on your progress!
Q: I take it you have the VHS tape first Roboti...
A: Take a deep breath, Erskine. There is nothing unique about the tape; it's the same tape sold by TLC back in 2001. VHS tapes degrade over time, so the video quality on a 20+ year-old VHS cassette is not going to be any better than currently available digital copies.
I didn't buy the eBay offering for the tape -- I bought it for the unique "For Your Consideration" cardboard tape box sent to members of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. Besides, I don't even have a video to digital converter.
Q: Well I know you do not have one however since I am very nice too you and I am very warm-hearted I'd thought I would find you a video digital convert as a souvenir in honour of Aaron and of your Robotica voyage let me try and find one for your souvenir
A: That's very kind of you, Erskine -- but please do not bother. I'm not interested in digitizing a copyrighted video tape and uploading it. I realize that mine is an unpopular position, but I respect the rights of copyright holders.
Comment: Oh right you only have the box for the tape right you can always lend to me so i can privately convert to digi-allright where are those rats allright you 4 get back into the labyrinth these pesky vermins
1) You said before that I was in contention for an award early this year, and while I obviously want to know if I won, I'm more interested in what the award could be.
A: Mark J. I am pleased to announce that you have been recognized as theAsk Aaron 2023 Contributor of the Year! Your posts have convinced me that you have read every word of every combat robot page on the site, and your questions have been so diverse and far reaching that you are one of only two contributors in the history of Ask Aaron to earn their own sub-page. You had no serious competition, but I wanted to wait to the end of the year to make the announcement. The award itself has two parts:
A: I do track total visitors to RunAmok.tech, but I only track views of individual pages within a moving horizon of about three days. I consider that information to be proprietary, but I suppose that if you wanted to use your wish I would be compelled to tell you.
And for suggestions...
Lastly, I want to say thank you for your help with my videos. I'm planning to have my YouTube channel up by the end of the month (it'll be the one with the purple bird on a green background), and I finally finished my short video about the history of drones in robot combat! I'm also working on a BattleBots parody series in Robot Arena 2 called 'IceyBots' and also a video reviewing every episode of 'The Ghost and Molly McGee' (I'm not just a robot nerd, but an animation nerd as well)!
-sincerely, Icey
I'm very pleased to hear that you found reading thru the thousands of questions and answers here at Ask Aaron to be therapeutic, Icey. I will admit that researching and answering questions submitted to Ask Aaron provides me with a bit of therapy as well. I hope your 2024 continues to go as well as it has started.
Now, I just had a thought. I was thinking of creating some files for paper models of Team Run Amok's other robots to go along with Run Amok! I just need to know whether you prefer raster or vector files. If raster files are better, what resolution would be best?
-sincerely, Iceywave
A: Mark J. I haven't seen a new paper combat robot model in years, Iceywave. I've found raster graphics to be better accepted by my readers. For our purposes 150 DPI is fine for a model to be printed in an 8.5" by 11" format.
P.S. Could you provide a Wikipedia link to 'The Ghost and Molly McGee' as well?
A: Yes I could. Just win the 2024 contributor of the year award and use that free wish for another link.
Q: P.S.S. I sent this message yesterday at around 8:30pm central time, but it appears you haven't received it. It's probably something weird on my end. : )
A: No, the problem is on my end. For future reference, my Friday evenings are pretty full. I have dinner at the country club, practice the bassoon for two hours, and then sharpen my figure skates before going to bed. On Saturday mornings I will typically split half a cord of firewood before sitting down to my breakfast of steel-cut oatmeal with brown sugar.
Today I had to set aside an additional portion of my morning to participate in an on-line panel discussion about the impact of the shower scene in Hitchcock's "Psycho" on 20th century film making. Did you know that there are fifty-two camera cuts in that one scene? Then I responded to questions from Erskine and yourself.
Gotta go... the pinsetter on lane eight at Firebird Bowl-a-Rama has broken again and they want me to fix it before the junior league tournament starts.
March, 2023 - We celebrated our 20th anniversary by giving away a stack of complete termite-weight robot kits in our 'Secret Identity Contest'. The contest is now closed, but you can still try to solve the puzzle. Think you know your combat robots? Give our anniversary puzzle a try:
A: Mark J. Take your pick:
Cockney: Cor blimey, mate! This 'ere collectable's a bit of a geezer, innit? But Ask Aaron ain't gonna chuck up no live eBay links for it, nah-uh. That's too much like a bleedin' advert, ain't it? And why'd I wanna stir up all the fuss for something I might fancy buyin', eh? Keep it on the down-low, savvy?
Scottish: Aye, ken, this collectable's a bit o' a guid find, nae doot. But Ask Aaron's no plasterin' live eBay links for it, ken? Too much like an advert, that. An' why bother stirrin' up interest for somethin' I might fancy buyin', aye? Stick to the workin' ways, nae need for a big fuss.
Television networks will send out special For Your Consideration (FYC) copies of some of their programs to members of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences in hopes that the members will nominate it for an Emmy Award. The Learning Channel sent out a set of these "screener" copies in hopes of having "Robotica" nominated in the Picture Editing and Sound Mixing categories for non-fiction programs "...and all other eligible categories."
In 2001 these "screener" copies were on VHS tape. Erskine stumbled upon one of the rare Robotica FYC tapes on eBay. There is nothing special about the recording of 'Season 1 Episode 1' itself, but the packaging is unique and collectable. The seller was a VHS dealer specializing in rare tapes and he wanted a bit more than I thought the item was worth.
I needed a little time to put in a reasonable offer before word got out and a ton of viewers and watchers showed up to give the seller the idea that he was going to get his full price. Time passed, I offered, he accepted, deal done.
A: Mark J. I've added the RA2 .bot files to the others on our Robot Arena: Design and Destroy page. Your screen grab has been added to the Iceywave Gallery. Thanks!
And in terms of questions, I have three...
A: I'm a 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' fan. The source is: Angel & Faith #11. Dark Horse Comics, 2012. View Here
A: #10 happened to hundreds of BattleBots competitors, and I learned about #21 when I loaned out a spare radio...
Life in the pits during the 'Comedy Central' years of BattleBots was very different than life at the other televised robot shows. Hot catered food was served at Robotica and Robot Wars, but the lunch included with your entry fee at BattleBots was a white cardboard box containing a lunchmeat sandwich, a bag of off-brand chips, and a bottle of water. Some people claimed they got a cookie -- they must have been favored locals.
Back about 2003, Team Plumb Crazy ('Stinger', 'Sewer Snake'...) signed on to compete in one of the independent combat events that sprang up in England after the original run of Robot Wars was over. The 75 MHz R/C radios used in the US weren't legal in England, so they asked to borrow one of our UK-legal 50 MHz Futaba R/C systems left over from our Robot Wars trips. When their trip was cancelled I got an email from them that became Battbotica #21.
A: The crushed dreams of our opponents, same as any other day.
Now unlike other robots in this game except for Diesector here is the configuration on Tazbot the weapon the horizontal axe pick on a lifting arm mounted on a 360 degree turret
A: Mark J. I don't think anyone's going to hack into a twenty-year-old Gamecube prototype to patch in a Tazbot replica any time soon -- but you don't have to wait. Will you settle for playing Tazbot in Robot Arena 2 DSL 2.2?
A: Mark J. The BotsFC.com archives indicate that updates post only two or three times a year -- and generally in the winter months. For example, there were no updates between March '21 and January '22. At one point Adam's original Total Insanity Combat Robotics site went nine years without an update, so I wouldn't worry much about BotsFC being neglected for 9 months.
I make it a point to avoid badgering webmasters about why their site hasn't been updated recently. When I do they usually write back with a list of my pages that I haven't touched in a few years and a reminder that my site design is stuck in the 90's. Serves me right for complaining. If you'd like to poke a sleeping bear you can send an email to BotsFC.
Q: In hindsight, I think I got a little paranoid over nothing. I would never want to poke a sleeping bear!
But I am wondering, were did you meet Roger the Web Gerbil? I hope he's still doing well (gerbils only live for 1-2 years, so...)
And here's my latest RA2 build, Run Away! I used the Run Amok chassis and gave it a new paint job and some modifications (ignore the size difference, it's just the camera angle)
P.S. Did you receive my recreation of Propeller-Head vs The Gap? I can resend the image if needed.
- sincerely, Iceywave
A: Rodger is no ordinary gerbil. I needed a little website help and found his resume on LinkedIn. He had a degree from Cal Tech and very reasonable salary demands: food, a water bottle, a little wheel to run in, and gig-speed internet. He's been living on the bottom shelf of my bookshelf for better than five years and he looks as healthy today as he did when I first picked him up at the bus station.
I did receive your Robot Arena 2 depiction of The Gap and Propeller-Head, thank you. I restrict the number of 'fan art' posts to the Ask Aaron main page, so I've made a special Iceywave gallery at the bottom of your RunAmok Iceywave page that has all three of your screen grabs.
I have two more questions for today:
1. With Conquering Clown having fought at proving grounds (and winning apparently!) wouldn't that be the record for longest gap between two fights for a bot? (19 years, correct me if I'm wrong.)
A: Mark J. I think you'd have a rough time gaining consensus on what counts as "a bot" and what qualifies as "between fights".
2. Are there any serious contenders for the 'weirdest question of the year' so far?
A: For a while I was giving out a 'weird question' award for each month, but it has been quite some time since I've received a truely odd question that wasn't a deliberate troll. I'll have to take a look back at the end of the year to see if there is anything worth mentioning.
P.S. I'm an avid Robot Arena 2 player, and I thought you would like this image. (Credit to 'goose' on gametechmods for making the Fight to the Finish arena!) -Sincerely, Iceywave
A: Whoa! Is that the tail of 'Killer Bee' disappearing over the edge of the platform? Hard for me to tell. We could actually feel the heat from the flames up in the driver balcony, and looking at that image makes me a little warm again. Thanks.
For any Robot Arena 2 fans out there, I have that RA2 model of Run Amok available for you to download and drop into the game -- just as Iceywave has done.
...and you do know about the Robotica mini video game in Metalmania, right?
A: Mark J. You're likely thinking of the Big Bang Robotics team shirts for their middleweight 'Heavy Metal Noise'. You have the list title just a bit off:
A: Mark J. Well youngster, just set back and let this old-timer tell you what it was like out on the frontier of the early Internet...
In the late 90's I subscribed to home a Dial-up Internet access and email service thru my local library for a reasonable monthly fee. While reading the service documentation I discovered that my account included "five megabytes of internet accessible file storage." I wasn't entirely sure what that was, but I was paying for it and I was determined to use it.
The service start-up disk included simple file transfer software and I experimented with uploading and downloading .txt and .gif files. After some head scratching I figured out the URL of my file storage and I was able to access the uploaded files with a web browser. I taught myself how to code simple pages in HTML and joined a Webring so that search engines could find my pages. I went thru a few Internet Service Providers with increasing web storage until 2017 when I leased space on a private server and bought the RunAmok.tech URL.
The first Ask Aaron page was primitive, but it was fairly typical of hobby web pages at the time. Once in a while someone will try to troll me by saying that my current web pages "look like the 1990's." They obviously don't know what the 90's looked like.
I have a webpage dedicated to the history of Ask Aaron that has samples of the page from different eras, links to our anniversary contest pages, and a chart of questions answered over time.
Q: P.S. do you still own the chicken hat? Just curious.
A: The post says "I used to have a cowboy hat with a cartoonish foam plastic chicken...", but I do still have it and I wear it every year on International Respect for Chickens Day. I am not ashamed.
A: Mark J. Probably
A: Mark J. It is a rare honor, Iceywave. The only other builder with their own page here is a fella from Beverly, Texas who had a whole lot of questions about a Tombstone-style bar spinner.
Here are my serious questions for today...
1. I found an image on google of a BuggleBots annihilator, but I can't find the actual fight anywhere online.
A: Mark J. Five beetles and heavyweight 'Two Headed Death Flamingo'? The poster was an April Fool's joke uploaded to Facebook by BuggleBots in 2020. I'll tell them they got you.
When I saw that poster I thought, "Wow, I didn't know they built a 3lb version of Two Headed Death Flamingo." [face palm]
2. Could you share some more information about that antweight you made out of duct tape? I'm sure others are interested as well.
A: The origin was an Ask Aaron post from 2015:
A: Mark J. If it was designed by an 'average' robot combat builder:
3. Do you upload answers to questions when you first finish typing them out, or do you have them set to publish at a specific time?
A: Usually one, sometimes the other.
P.S. Thanks for the info about torsion springs and music wire. My HexBug model of P1 will be able to work perfectly (when I 3D print the parts, that is)!
Anyways, I thought I would ask you to grade my ideas for other antwieght robots. Please know that I'm just brainstorming and I'm not going to build them anytime soon, but I just wanted to know if any of these ideas are good. Some of these I thought of when I was very sleep deprived, BE WARNED.
A: Mark J. There's a lot of mini Run Amok activity at the moment.
Your wheel sizes are very good . The rears are spot on, and the fronts are as close as you can get with Lego parts. The wheelbase looks just a bit long -- in correct scale Run Amok's tires do not extend rearward beyond the end of the top armor. Overall, very nice!
Q: Here is a workprint on Run Amok R/C however I have managed to pick up a Hexbug Fireant (the Red particularly) and will find the same Lego wheels that I used for the rear wheels for the freewheeling Run Amok and just for a modernization as much for its automotive steering the Run Amok I'll create using the Hexbug Fireant will have tank steering and/or 4 wheel drive and 4 wheel steering but other than that my Fireant should come either Monday or Tuesday even if coming during rainy days which I have just now in which you currently do not have and once I've create my first actual Hexbug Run Amok and Flexy Flyer using the Hexbug Whiplash which other Robotica competitor would you like to see me make a Hexbug model of next?
A: You've got a good start there, Erskine!
You're correct that the autumn rains have not really started here in Oregon's Willamette Valley, but they will soon. I have a few late summer projects still to get done, and I'm running short on time.
Next Hexbug Robotica model? I think you could make a good 'Ram Force' model from the Hexbug 'Duck!', don't you?
And if I am right the speed controller was from England and the motor from Germany. My R/C car you told me about for creating an R/C Run Amok will be with me tomorrow. I saw the Hexbug Run Amok image created using a Fire Ant, but even though my R/C Run Amok won't be a hexbug Run Amok It might be a Hexbug SCALE Run Amok (I wish Hexbug would create R/C Robots with 'Automotive Steering') so hopefully I can do well and wish me the best of luck.
A: Mark J. As it happens, I still have the can of paint (pictured) used for the red arrow on Run Amok's top armor. The paint is oil-based Rust-Oleum Sunrise Red gloss enamel.between them.
A: Mark J. I'm honored, Iceywave. That's as nice a micro 'Run Amok' as I've seen. Thanks for the photo!
You're looking for a "torsion spring". Using that name you can find a bewildering selection of sizes, lengths, and number of coils on Amazon, like these 0.5mm wire 6-coil springs.
If you can't find the exact spring you need, you can start with some steel music wire in the diameter you need and wrap it tightly around a small diameter rod to make your own custom spring. The first few you make will be... a learning experience, but you'll get the knack pretty quickly. Your local hobby shop almost certainly has music wire in stock. A 24 gauge wire is 0.022" in diameter, and 0.020" music wire is a standard size.
A: I can neither confirm or deny the rumor, Iceywave. Others interested in the source of this rumor mashup may wish to read this post and this post in "Aaron's Greatest Hits".
Q: P.S. I noticed that you put a space in between my eyes and mouth on my smiley faces, have I been typing emoticons incorrectly this whole time?
- Sincerely, Iceywave
A: Just my personal preference. I think a text emoji with a space displays better on a web page. ; ^ )
A: Mark J. I've seen worse -- but yes, it's bad. I give it four pickles on the bad hamburger scale.
A: Mark J. Mike Morrow lives four blocks from Run Amok corporate headquarters. When he gives you the digitized videos I'll meet him at the corner pub and buy him a beer with your regards.
A: Mark J. BotRank maintains a database of names of all the robots from all the event results that are sent to them. Not all events report their tournament results to BotRank, but it's the best single source of names available.
NOTE: BotRank's ranking and tournament records databases have been scrambled for about nine months now -- ignore them. The names data appears to be intact.
A: Mark J. No apology required, Iceywave. Things went a little sideways with the 2023 Combat Robot Hall of Fame balloting, and more than a few people submitted very large numbers of robots on their ballots. No harm was done. I'm already able to look back at the matter and have a good laugh.
Your ballot did set a record, and that record will stand. Future balloting will have a limit on the number of robots listed.
A: Mark J. Have you tried looking on The Combat Robot Hall of Fame?
A: Mark J. The Combat Robot Hall of Fame opens balloting for new members in August of odd-numbered years. During the open balloting period you may vote for any robots that you please, but the Hall has specific rules and guidelines that define what robots are actually eligible for membership -- and there is a special section in the rules devoted to BotKits and Kitbots:
I would consider a creating a special
A: Mark J. The Robot Combat Hall of Fame opens balloting for new members in August of odd-numbered years. This year, balloting will be open from August 7th thru August 20th. Given that Team Run Amok hosts 'The Hall' and counts the ballots, I don't think it's appropriate for me to share my list or campaign for specific robots.
If you'd like to hear some pros and cons for potential new members to the RCHoF, the July 28th Robot Combat Tonight video podcast from The Combot Collective has an extended section on the topic. I don't agree with all of their conclusions, but the discussion itself may give you some ideas and candidates.
A: Mark J. Our Robot Wars robot 'The Gap' can do a good dance. A full-force flipper activation while in special 'fast spin' transmitter mode can rock it back off the drive wheels and into a brief spin on the tail of the chassis. But... we don't do victory dances.
Although it's entertaining, a victory dance is a little too 'in your face' for Team Run Amok. We're more grateful for the competition than for the outcome. At the end of a match we shut down our 'bot and shake the hands of our opponents. If we win our smiles are just a little bigger than if we lose.
A: Mark J. You're very welcome, Madison. Now I'm sorry it took me so long to get around to uploading the Oregon Clandestine Street Fight matches. If I'd known the videos had an audience waiting I would have done it sooner!
If an official Team Run Amok cap could complete your childhood dream send me your address and I'll mail one to you -- for the sake of forever ago.
A: Mark J. Whoa... Team Dark Forces built a whole lot of robots in the last 20+ years. I came up with twenty fairly quickly but I knew I was missing some. I dropped an IM to builder Russ Barrow to see if he had a complete list of his own creations. He replied:
Back in the day, there were the heavier 'bots like 'Dark Shredder', 'Dark Steel', 'Dark Track/Lightening Tracks', 'Dark 44', 'Dark Ripper', and 'Dark Stryker'. Some old small bots included 'Dark Micro 44', 'Dark Micro Shredder', 'Dark Micro Steel', and many others I have actually forgotten. I do love building.
A: Mark J. 'Nasty Glass of Water' was a hobbyweight robot we built for the September 2001 NERC Hobby Expo event in Chicago. It was a 'bottomless' dust pan controlbot design driven by a huge pair of automotive windshield wiper motors running at 24 volts. Think of it as a very early experiment in anti-wedge forks.
At the moment it's impossible to find much of anything on SPARC BotRank -- the database is badly corrupted and a great many records are missing.
It's been busted for about 6 months and you are the 1st to notice. No one uses it anymore. It is going to be semi-retired from regular use. Everyone has switched over the the results/tracking and ranking system on the RobotCombatEvents site which has >90% of events submitting their results as opposed to the height of botrank which had ~50% of events.
[Name Redacted] wants to take it over and do some stuff with it, so it isn't going away but it may take some time to get it transferred.
You can drop a note to Rob to thank him for keeping BotRank going thru the years and let him know that you found it to be a valuable asset to combat robotics.
A: Mark J. You can't just hang a sheet of metal off the front of your robot and call it a wedge -- a wedge requires structural support. With the wedge itself removed the tubular steel 'bumper' and support members are exposed. The top supports angle upward and are welded to the strong front chassis beam that also carries the steering bushings. The lower supports extend all the way back to the steel battery box. The widely separated anchorage locations spread impact forces across the chassis.
Early testing revealed too much flexing along the sides of the wedge. Before shipping out to Robotica we welded 1/4" thick aluminum angle stock along both edges to reinforce this potential weakness.
I originally had short video clips of the fights in the journal, but one day I was stepping thru the full video frame-by-frame and realized how much more detail and drama that type of replay gave. I grabbed four critical frames from each of the videos, individually enhanced them for sharpness and color, and spliced the results together into a pair of slow-motion gifs.
In the gif above you can see Killer Bee's rising wedge clip Run Amok's top armor and lift her front wheels off the arena surface as the Bee tips over the edge of the platform -- a detail that went unnoticed in the video.
A: Mark J. The iconic American pop artist Andy Warhol was frequently asked about his favorite movie. He seldom gave the same answer twice, and most of the films he mentioned were obscure.
A: Mark J. 'Run Amok' is 44 inches in length, so a correct 1/10th scale finished model should be 4.4 inches long (11.2 cm). If you copy the image below and print it 7.33 inches wide (18.63 cm) it should cut out and fold up to scale correctly -- but feel free to print it any size you like.
A: Mark J. Sorry Erskine, I'm not comfortable endorsing or publicizing a commercial streaming service. It's too close to an advertisement.
I pay all the bills for runamok.tech and have never accepted advertising, product perks, or sponsorship of any sort. Builders submitting questions need to know that any recommendations I might make are my own and not tied to income.
Got any more?
A: Mark J. Yes, I did ask and am now answering my own existential question. AI chatbots are getting a lot of press coverage with speculation that they may replace a lot of human authorship. Maybe it's time to let a chatbot take over my duties here at Ask Aaron. Here's a recent simple question to Ask Aaron with my response:
A: Mark J. Wire the BEC in between the battery power buss and the receiver -- just like the ESCs. You may plug it into any available port on the receiver.
Let's give ChatGTP an audition:
I fed the same question - adding the context that it was about an R/C robot - into ChatGPT to see how well the chatbot might do in answering a combat robotics question. The result is too long to post here -- you can read all about it here: Why Not Ask ChatGPT?
March, 2023 - We celebrated our 20th anniversary by giving away a stack of complete termite-weight robot kits in our 'Secret Identity Contest'. The contest is now closed, but you can still try to solve the puzzle. Think you know your combat robots? Give our anniversary puzzle a try:
Reply: Mark J. Just yesterday I had Rodger the Web Gerbil paste an upgraded version of the javascript 'Brushless Motor Torque Estimator' into the Ask Aaron Spinner Weapon FAQ. I'll bet the sloppy little rodent re-used a variable from the javascript 'Bite Calculator' on the same page and munged the code. I'd fire him, but he has a family to support and he literally works for peanuts.
I'll get in there and bang on the iron myself...
Update: The little furry guy assigned the same name to both script functions. I renamed one rodger_is_a_talentless_hack and everything is fine. We'll see how long it takes him to notice the new name.
A: Mark J. You have a good memory. The official TLC/Discovery Robotica Fansite (archived) took questions from viewers as the seasons unfolded. Jeff Cesnik (Kritical Mass) Took the first shift for Season 1. I took over at the end of the first season to fill the gap 'til the start of Season 2 when Dan Danknick took over as technical advisor and host.
I've got a complete set of the questions and answers from all three volumes. Give me a sec and I'll wrap a webpage around them...
Four Hours Later...
There -- all done. It took a bit of squeezing to get all the links to work; I think I got most of them. Viewer Q & A from the TLC/Discovery Robotica Fansite
A: Mark J. Robots change. At the official Robotica weigh-in Run Amok did weigh 161 pounds with the front wedge attached -- but without the ten-pound iron weight we bolted into her nose after discovering the steering problem she had on the polished concrete surface of 'The Speedway'. Add in a pound of hardware to secure the iron weight and you get Weight (ready for combat): 172 lbs. -- which is still well under the 210-pound Robotica limit. The show announcements were just being read from the official spec sheet.
A: Mark J. The Micro Run Amok model is a 1/10th scale version of Run Amok, but Run Amok is about 1/4th the length of a small sedan. That makes a suitable R/C car chassis someplace around 1/40th scale. Small R/C cars have a lot of speed and little pushing ability, but something like the WOWRC 1/32 Scale Mini R/C Car could be a start for something just to drive around. You can enlarge the paper model a bit in printing if required.
A: Mark J. Thank you for the nice note. I think I should do something in return: here is a link to a scan of the trading cards that four Robotica competitors published for their fans: Run Amok, JuggerBot, Silverback, and Death By Monkeys. Each card has a robot photo on the front and robot/team info on the back. I hope you like them.
A: Mark J. I'm mulling over several options to celebrate Ask Aaron's 20th anniversary, possibly including a contest like we had five and ten years ago. While I make up my mind, here's a fictional post based on one of the entries in 2018's Mad Lib Contest:
A: Do what all the 'cool' builders do...
I've been working on the idea of a full body drum spinner for a while now on and off and I keep getting stumped. No matter how I design this thing I can't seem to have enough weight to spare. I always seem to have about 250g left in weight whether I go short and large OD drum or wide and small OD, and I can't for the life of me figure out how to make a drum that keeps this darn thing under 1lb. Do you have any advice on building a massive drum that's still lightweight and easy to assemble/disassemble? Any advice on where I may be able to lose weight?
Thanks in advance! [Davenport, Iowa]
A: Mark J. A prosperous and fulfilling New Year to you, Davenport.
Given that your chassis design leaves more than half the weight allowance available, I don't quite understand what problem you're trying to solve. You didn't include dimensions, materials, or possible drum designs; are you fishing for a compliment on your clever spring-loaded friction drum drive cradle (it is very nice) or trying for the first "Bad Hamburger" of the year?
If you're really having trouble getting a full cylinder wrapped around the full chassis, how about a short cylinder just to pick up the friction drive? Attach that to a pair of long beater bars anchored to bearing carriers at each end? It's a little sketchy on torsional rigidity, but it's certainly easy to assemble.
One Note: Your 'massive drum' is going to produce a whole lot of gyroscopic lift in turning maneuvers. You may want to run some numbers thru the Total Insanity Gyro Force Calculator before you settle on a design. A full-body drum standing on end lacks intimidation.
A: I'm surprised it took so long for someone to ask about this.
Every document that travels the internet receives an IP address signature from each computer server it passes thru. These signatures are stored in a message 'header' that is usually not shown by the reader software. I dig out the first IP address signature in the chain and look up its registered location. The problem is that IP addresses are occasionally re-assigned and it takes the look-up services a while to catch up. Some sources told me your message came from Chicago and some said Amarillo.
A: Mark J. Sure, be Will Bales' rake.
By the way i like the Red Arrow Design on Run Amok, Red suits him. [Inchinnan, Scotland]
A: Mark J. I've carefully read your message and the only question I can find appears to be rhetorical. I'll just go ahead and make up a couple of questions and answer them:
A: Yes. BattleBots Update has recently released an early prototype of the 2002 BattleBots game for the Nintendo Gamecube -- with the official approval of BattleBots creators Trey Roski and Greg Munson. A link to a Gamecube emulator for Windows is included in the article. Enjoy.
Q: Is it in any way possible to play a virtual version of 'Run Amok' in Robot Arena 2?
A: Yes. Runamok.tech has a zipped Run Amok.bot file that can be extracted and imported directly into Robot Arena 2 as a user-created 'bot. Enjoy.
A: Mark J. One of several from Aaron's Greatest Hits:
A: Take away its bus pass.
A: Mark J. I've had pizza in Wales. Don't bother. Go out for crempogau.
A: Mark J. We designed 'Run Amok' to meet the frequently changing specs for the Season 1 challenges. Those specs did not "finalize" until 3-weeks prior to the shipping date for our 'bot, and a few unexpected changes were waiting for us when we arrived on set. We believed that many of the competitors would have too narrow a design focus and encounter trouble in whatever the final versions of 'The Maze' and 'The Gauntlet' turned out to be, so our design mandate was to make 'Run Amok' capable of completing variations on each of those challenges. Our belief turned out to be correct.
Although I think 'Run Amok' would be capable of scrambling thru the Season 2-3 version of The Gauntlet obstacle walls (with our wedge removed), the added challenge of the 'glass forest' at the end would have put us at a serious disadvantage to more conventional tank-steered robots. We would have designed a very different robot to compete in the later Robotica seasons.
On a 'just for fun' basis I would have liked to have had a shot at the Season 2-3 challenges, but 'Run Amok' was designed for Season 1 and that worked out just fine.
A: Mark J. The Robot Report keeps a list of botcasts that represent a wide range of styles and focus. Some are labeled "Family Friendly" and some "Mature". You should be able to find something there that suits your interests.
I'm personally quite fond of Rise of the Robots -- a good-natured look back at televised combat robot shows from all eras and networks. More than 170 episodes available and a new cast each week. Their Facebook page says they're releasing a "super special" episode on Friday, September 2nd... I wonder what that might be?
Also, I had never seen the robot Beauty on the list and then one day it just appeared out of nowhere saying it was inducted in 2009! What's up with that?
I'd really appreciate if you could answer these questions.
A: Mark J. Someone has been paying attention! I did a reformat of the Combat Robot Hall of Fame a few months ago to make the page look more 'modern' and two unrelated things happened:
A: Mark J. How high is your risk tolerance?
A: Mark J. Yes, kinda...
"Cut and Fold" paper models of combat robots were a thing at the time. I know of three printable paper models from the Robotica series:
For those unfamiliar with the game, "Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts" was the progenitor to games like "Besiege" and "Robocraft". Released for the Xbox 360 in 2008 in celebration for 10 years of the release from the original Banjo-Kazooie game. The objective is to build various vehicles that solve puzzles and perform tasks in various environments. (Carry 'X' to 'Y', knock down this object, win this race, etc.)
I know Run Amok has four wheels, and this one technically does, but I intentionally put large wheels in the back and smaller ones up front so that the entire vehicle tilts forward and has near zero ground clearance. My biggest gripe with Nuts & Bolts is that nothing truly has a "wedge" unless you do something fancy with the wheels like this, so that was a trade off to have a wedge that literally scrapes the floor in the game. It was purpose-built to do a sumo challenge in the game against an AI opponent that doesn't know the HOT TIPS like I do.
Under the hood there's actually a row of three of those big wheels in a row, that's why there's wheel covers on the vehicle so you can't see the "creative liberties" I had to make under the hood. I filled in the sides of the robot too just for aesthetics because otherwise you'll see how it all works and in Nuts & Bolts that sometimes looks pretty ugly. Anyways I was building bots and I did this one and 'Bite Force' because they're two of my favorites that I was able to build.
The arrow should be just on top of the robot and not on the wedge, but since the robot isn't long enough to put the arrow on top the wedge is still a good secondary location. It is distinctly still "Run Amok".
Reply: Mark J. Yes, it is distinctly 'Run Amok'! Thank you for remembering the old girl. I will assume she won the sumo challenge -- she's good at that.
I have several things planned to observe our anniversary year. For a start I've restored a few of our first-year web pages that have suffered from obsolete formats and outdated code. Check the Team Run Amok webpage for a full list, and check back for updates!
A: Mark J. Entirely not true. I'm here 'live' and answering as many questions as ever. I don't generally time stamp posts but I'll make an exception here:
If I do re-post from the Ask Aaron Archives I will label the post to make that clear -- like this:
A: Mark J. The Tentacle Drivetrain Calculator is a tremendously useful combat robot design tool, but you need to understand what it's actually telling you about the drive train design. Among other things, the calculator estimates the amount of torque needed to 'break traction' and spin the drive wheels of the robot based upon the weight pressing down on the wheels. If the drive train cannot provide at least that much torque the drive motors may 'stall' under heavy pushing loads, which will both reduce pushing power and risk damage to the motors. The calculator will warn you of this condition.
For calculation of pushing force and stall conditions you do not need to worry about your opponent weighing you down.
A: Mark J. Assuming that you're talking about recently active teams, the most complete information is maintained by The Builders Database.
If you're trying to contact teams in your area, I would suggest looking thru the well maintained list of upcoming robot combat events at RobotCombatEvents.com. Clicking on one of the events will open a page with information about the event, and from there you can click on one of the 'Bot Weightclasses' to get pictures of the registered robots and links to the teams.
A: Given my position as administrator of the Combat Robot Hall of Fame I'm careful to avoid 'playing favorites'. I keep my ballot to myself and I avoid promoting specific robots for membership. That said:
A: Mark J. Oddly enough, I make omelettes for my co-workers.
We had a day off between our preliminary round victory and the Robotica finals. When I woke up that morning I turned on the hotel room TV and 'The Big Cheese' episode of 'Dexter's Laboratory' was on. All thru that day and the next I had "omelette du fromage" running thru my head, so now I make about a dozen cheese omelettes on anniversary morning to banish that phrase from my mind for another year.
A: Mark J. RBI Productions filmed 'Robotica' at the historic Prospect Studios just east of Hollywood. The studios are owned and operated by the Walt Disney Company, and were formerly the west coast headquarters for ABC television.
I kept a journal of the filming that you may find interesting: Robotica Journal.
Q: If Robotica ever gets rebooted, would you create a new version of Run Amok and compete in honor of Aaron?
A: Mark J. Much though Aaron enjoyed competing, he had a greater love of helping people and sharing his knowledge. I believe that Team Run Amok has had a beneficial impact on combat robotics through our efforts to support combat robot builders, and I believe that continuing with those efforts is the best public way for us to honor Aaron.
I would be pleased to support the production of a Robotica reboot, but our team lost its competitive heart. We will not return to competition.
A: Mark J. We didn't waterproof 'Run Amok' -- it wasn't necessary. The top armor was a single, solid sheet that shed water to the edges like a roof. The only vulnerable components (steering servo, receiver, and speed controller) were all tucked up against the top armor and had their own cases that would resist any random splash. None of the 'bots at 'Robotica' had any trouble with the water.
A: Mark J. Jason Dante Bardis was building a 'bot from scratch to compete at Robotica, but he ran out of time and decided to substitute a very light 'bot that was essentially the chassis for 'Dr. Inferno Jr.' with a carbon fiber wedge added. Although the drivetrain was very powerful (four DeWalt 18v gearmotors running at 24 volts), the robot weighed weighed only 37 pounds. At the weigh-in, Jason walked onto the scale carrying 'Mini Inferno' and was still under-weight! Powerful though it was, Mini just didn't have enough pushing power to be a threat against any of the robotica finalists in a sumo match.
Jason did finish his original Robotica entry and fought with it at BattleBots seasons 3.0 thru 5.0 with limited success. He remarked on a forum post that after he finished 'Towering Inferno' he realized that it would not have been a successful Robotica competitor.
'Killer B', on the other hand, was a very dangerous sumo competitor. Had they put the blunt end of the robot into use instead of the wedge end, they could have used their powerful drivetrain to simply shove 'Run Amok' off the platform. Lucky for me, they didn't choose that option.
Never had my own video tribute, and an Ahmet/Dweezil Zappa soundtrack is a big plus! Thanks Alexander...
A: Mark J. The page you linked shows a change in the Wikia article categorization for 'TriDent' from Danish Robots to Armenian Robots on 4 June, 2018. I generally stay out of Wikia editing disputes, but I know something about TriDent that might clear this up.
A: Mark J. My robots don't care. My robots don't spread, suffer from, or die from Covid-19 -- but you can. Don't be selfish. Follow the science. Stay safe.
A: Mark J. You came to the right place.
'Ask Aaron' has a long history of receiving requests for very specific recommendations on materials or components that provide far too little information for us to give a useful answer. We needed a name for this type of question and a way to explain our problem in answering. In 2010 we published a webpage titled "The Hamburger is Bad" that uses a fictional exchange of questions and answers about whether a 1/4 pound hamburger is good to depict the problem. The name caught on in the combat robot community.
So, "the hamburger is bad" is not so much a rule as a shorthand request to provide adequate information when asking a question.
A: Mark J. Your question comes from a web server associated with web proxy services that mask user location. Please remove your VPN service and resubmit. If you have nothing to hide, don't try to hide it.
I'm very serious about safety in combat robotics. I no longer answer 'Ask Aaron' questions from geographic regions that ask only about building more powerful robot combat weapons with little to no regard for building safer robot combat arenas. Builders from these regions often attempt to sneak questions thru by disguising their true locations with VPN and proxy services. Questions that arrive via known proxy servers are generally ignored because of the time it takes for me to determine the true origin of the question.
A: Mark J. Not a robot question, but it's a slow morning and I do have a minor in math...
Z = (x - μ) ÷ σ = (73 - 52) ÷ 35 = 0.6
Consult a Z-score table:
P(x ≤ 73) = P(z = 0.6) = 0.7257
P(x ≥ 73) = P(z = -0.6) = 0.2743
A: Mark J. Who wants dibs on the name "Antisocial Distancing"?
What notes must you play while performing a concerto?
A: Mark J. Cinch up your Mae Wests and read Frequently Asked Questions #3. Read the rest of the FAQ while you're there.
If you're still up for it, start with a small 'bot -- learning from your beginner's mistakes will cost a whole lot less in a lighter weight class.
A: Mark J. I'd chrome it and add some pin stripes.
मैं भारत के लड़ाकू रोबोटों के बारे में पूछे गए सवालों के जवाब नहीं देता.
A: Mark J. I'm pretty sure it was the same guy who discovered that anything beats out a flaming hammerbot.
A: Mark J. None -- snakes don't have armpits.
A: Mark J. Let's say that you're going to jump out of an airplane at 20,000 feet. Which of the following features do you want your parachute to have?
A robot like [insert robot name here] is built and maintained by a team with the talent, experience, dedication, and funding needed to cover all the bases. And no, they don't cheat.
A: Mark J. I do not take such liberties with ballots for the Hall. I simply count and report on all the verified ballots as submitted.
I've learned that forum chatter is a very poor predictor of Hall balloting. The 'D2 Kit' in question is 'Captain Doom', a 'bot popular in both UK and US balloting because of its success in the UK Bugglebots web-based mini-series and multiple US competitions. Several Bugglebots competitors showed up in the 2019 balloting.
As I dutifully reported, 'Captain Doom' appeared by name on more than 10% of the ballots received for 2019.
Q: Maybe Im just overlooking it, but Im not seeing the link to submit my Hall of Fame ballot anywhere?
A: Mark J. The link is deliberately not posted on 'Ask Aaron'. As noted at The Combat Robot Hall of Fame:
A: Mark J. The voting site will open at 12:01 AM (PDT) on Thursday, August 1st and will remain open for a full 16 minutes. Please be ready with your ballot and keep the line moving.
A: Did I say 16 minutes? Sorry... meant to say 16 days. Voting will close on Friday, August 16th at 11:59 PM (PDT). I plan to announce the voting results on Sunday, August 18th, 2019.
A: Mark J. To quote the Grateful Dead, "Lately it occurs to me what a long, strange trip it's been."
I could write a book on this topic, and anything less would not do the topic justice. Until my book comes out you should find and read a copy of "Gearheads -- The Tubulent Rise of Robotic Sports". Here's what I say about it in my book review page:
It's all here -- the early Robot Wars competitions in San Francisco, the clash between the creative and business aspects of robot combat, the legal turmoil, the personalities, the excitement... I locked myself in a quiet room and read the book cover-to-cover. Food crumbs on the pages mark where I grabbed a quick snack while continuing to read!
Anyone with an interest in the story behind combat robots needs to read this book. It is a fascinating read, and does a fine job of keeping all the parties involved very human. Highly recommended!
A: Mark J. Botrank is a service to the robotics community that tracks the competition records of combat robots and attempts to rank them within their weight class. BotRank simply tracks robots by the name they register for at a tournament. Given the number of robots and fights that they have to track this is a reasonable approach for them to take; a new name starts a new combat tracking record.
The Combat Robot Hall of Fame has a greater interest in the true heritage of a robot nominated for recognition. An increase or decrease in the weight of a robot or a name change (on a whim or to meet television production requirements) does not by itself create a new robotic entity. The Hall believes that the identity of a robot lies in its design concept. That can be a challenge to sort out.
I've put together a fairly lengthy explanation of how The Hall sorts this out - with examples: When two robots are really one, and when one robot is really two.
"Brand Name" robots like the ones in the HoF would be nice, but knock offs can be done for free. Use a similar set up to a need for speed game: start with a small budget and build something from preset configurations, win matches to get better materials, decals, etc. Do you think fear of lawsuits is the issue? I imagine there's enough interest but am wondering if it is a difficulty issue, a monetary issue, a legal issue or something else in the community. At least I think it would be a good way to draw in new fans.
Look forward to hearing your insights. Thanks again for all you do for the community. [Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania]
A: Mark J. You mean something like this: Robot Rumble 2?
A: Mark J. I feel your pain. The BotRank scoring is a modified version of a system developed to rank chess players where a typical player has a history of hundreds of games. A typical combat robot might only fight a handfull of matches in its career and the ranking system is very poor at comparing competitors with low numbers of 'games'. It works like this:
The robot gains points for each match win and loses points for each match loss.
My BotRank Scoring Spreadsheet will calculate correct score changes. It also lists the differences between the BotRank and standard 'Elo' systems. Details of the math behind the Elo system are available at Metin's Media & Math.
It doesn't make sense to me that a ranking is even given to a robot before it has won any matches, but builders like to see their robots ranked. A reasonable compromise might be to drop all robots with zero wins down below all robots with any wins and let them fight for ranking amongst themselves down there in the basement.
Now that I've aired my grievances, let me say that I greatly appreciate the efforts of BotRank in tracking and evaluating combat robotics in North America. Their work is important to the health of the sport and we all owe them our gratitude.
A: Mark J. Yes, I do. No, there isn't.
A: Mark J. I make it a point to keep my ballot for the The Combat Robot Hall of Fame to myself. I don't want the appearance that I'm trying to influence the voting result. Several years ago I made a slightly negative comment about a specific robot on a robot forum and I'm still getting mail about how unfair it is that I'm actively blocking HOF membership for that 'bot. I'm doing no such thing -- I cast one ballot, I count all the votes, and I make sure there's no hanky-panky. If you'd like to hear arguments for and against various potential members for The Hall, there is usually a roaring discussion over at the BattleBots subReddit as soon as balloting opens.
I will give you some general insight into my ballot for 2019. Robots from the lighter weight classes are severely under-represented in the Hall of Fame; only 5% of the members of The Hall weigh less than 60 pounds. There are many sub-light combat robots worthy of membership and I hope the combat robot community shows the smaller 'bots some respect on their ballots.
The Hall re-opens for balloting in early August of odd-numbered years -- stay tuned for details.
A: Mark J. I feel your pain, but I don't pick the 'bots that get into the Combat Robot Hall of Fame. I get one ballot just like everybody else and I can assure you that my ballot is packed full of sub-lightweight and insect class 'bots. I suspect that the international television exposure of heavyweight 'bots simply makes them better known and better appreciated than the lighter robots.
I'm considering action for the upcoming 2019 ballot to focus voter attention on lighter robots, but I don't want to tip my hand just yet.
The Combat Robot Hall of Fame opens for balloting in August of odd-numbered years. At that time the voting details are released to combat robot forums in the US, Europe, and Australia.
Keep your eye on the forums -- your next chance to vote will come in August of 2019.
Mid-February thru mid-March of 2019 was 'Clickbait Month' at 'Ask Aaron'. I'd fallen a little behind the curve on social media promotion, so I decided to roll out some hot 'clickbait' titles for questions. Was it pointless? Yes. Was it fun? I enjoyed it. Was it permanent? Absolutely not. Click a link to see how it went...
A: Mark J. Oddly enough, I make omelettes for my co-workers.
We had a day off between our preliminary round victory and the Robotica finals. When I woke up that morning I turned on the hotel room TV and 'The Big Cheese' episode of 'Dexter's Laboratory' was on. All thru that day and the next I had "omelette du fromage" running thru my head, so now I make about a dozen cheese omelettes on anniversary morning to banish that phrase from my mind for another year.
A: Mark J. Thank you, Altoona -- you as well.
Most of the runamok.tech pages have now been re-structured. You may notice some format differences in specific pages -- particularly on phones and tablets -- but the page contents have not been modified. I can only hope that my efforts will please the Google deity.
A: Mark J. 'Run Amok' enjoys painting abstract road art (see photo). Her favorite beverage is a 'Northern Thwackbot' -- a shot of WD-40 with a squirt of blue Loctite.
A: Mark J. Aaron and I both jumped directly into the deep end of the heavyweight robot fighting pool -- something much easier to do in the early 2000's than now.
Aaron's first fight was at 'Nickelodeon Robot Wars', a special kids version of Robot Wars filmed for the Nickelodeon network. The event was filmed in Shepperton, England in January of 2002 after completion of filming for the second season of Robot Wars Extreme Warriors. Aaron drove a patched-together 'Run Amok', severely damaged from the earlier tournament. The differential had been destroyed and one rear wheel was badly mangled, but I had promised to get Aaron on the Nickelodeon show and worked long hours to beat the wheel back round and construct a solid axle replacement for the differential to get the poor old robot ready for the fight. It was Aaron's first fight, Run Amok's last, and although it wasn't Team Run Amok's best fight we were proud to have answered the bell. Aaron at Nick Robot Wars video.
My first fight was also on international television at the first season of 'Robotica' on the TLC/Discovery network. Filming of 'Robotica' took place in March of 2001 at the ABC/Disney Prospect Studios in Hollywood. I'd had ample driving practice with 'Run Amok', but the robot handled much differently on a polished concrete studio floor than it had on an asphalt parking lot. You can watch the series of our fights and see me struggle to adapt to the new environments of the Robotica challenges. Run Amok at Robotica video.
A: Mark J. By Grabthar's Hammer! Everybody knows who the best and most effective robot is. Now please, never mention 'Moist Pony' again.
A: Mark J. I don't know '@the_guy_who_has_a_robot' and he apparently does not know what we do here. From the Ask Aaron mission statement:
Q: I am '@the_guy_who_has_a_robot' and I would like to apologize. I told the guy who had a question about the mono tooth spinner to go to you if with his question. I didn't know how to awnser it and I told him about you. I told him to give him lots of details. Not to ask you to make it. I apologize. Please accept my apology [Omaha, Nebraska]
A: Thanks for the explanation, Omaha. Getting caught in the middle requires no apology.
A: Mark J. I'm reluctant to discuss my travels. I don't even tell Google.
A: Mark J. Thank you for the mention of Run Amok -- several fans from our team's early days have contacted me recently with kind comments, stories, and memories. I'm also glad to hear from a fan of 'Chomp'. The robot and team get a lot of flack on the forums and they deserve more respect.
Due to elevated acceptance standards and heightened expectations associated with the ABC BattleBots reboot, many of the current teams are 'super groups' whose members each bring expertise from earlier independent robot projects. Although 'The Machine Corps' was formed for Battlebots and had no previous combat experience as a team, their members bring serious credentials:
A: Mark J. Yes, kinda. Team Force made their TV appearance on Robotica a few weeks before Team Whyachi appeared on BattleBots, but neither team had seen the other when the shirts were selected.
When you order embroidered hats and shirts you typically pick from a selection of 'stock' clothing on which to put your logo. The red/white/black 'Pit Crew' shirts were common stock items at the time, and both teams independently picked them out of the catalog. The Team Whyachi and Team Force hats, however, were quite different -- I have one of the 'Team Force' hats in my collection.
A: Mark J. Builder Ray Billings doesn't much believe in armor. I'm not sure you should even call the thin panels that stretch over Tombstone's old-school tubular chassis 'armor'.
Non-BattleBots versions of his big spinners use thin aluminum or Lexan panels, but out of concern for arena hammers and saws the 250-pound version has titanium panels top and bottom. The black side panels are painted -- not carbon.
A: Mark J....
Translator On
A: Mark J. Thanks, Josh! It's been a while since we received a fan letter. I'm very happy to hear that you're enjoying 'Ask Aaron'. It's really nice of you to offer a donation, but we cover our own expenses to avoid any conflict of interest. We want to be able to express our honest opinions and give fair advice without consideration for products or individuals that support the site.
If you'd like to do something to thank us for our efforts, Aaron's favorite charity was the Humane Society -- perhaps you could make a donation to your local chapter.
A: Mark J. I don't recall either 'Death Ray' or its post-BattleBots incarnation 'Orca' ever receiving so much as a single vote for inclusion in the Combat Robot Hall of Fame. Further, teams aren't offered the chance to decline membership in the Hall.
I've corrected the entry in the BattleBots Wiki and asked the responsible editor to stop living a fantasy. Thanks for the tip.
Reply:
A: Mark J. If you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does. See also this archived post about knowing when to eat lunch.
A: Mark J. I have too many friends (and enemies) in the sport to start an international flame war with a direct answer to your question. I'm going to side-step.
A: Mark J. I'd recommend that you work on keeping the head on your flaming hammer, Astronaut.
A: Mark J. You may ask as many questions as you like, and I will answer as many as I please.
There are a few off-limits topics, identified on the page you see after submitting a question. There is more guidance in our mission statement:
A: Yes, see this post farther down in this archive.
A: Mark J. There are some options:
Team Run Amok: Robotica Season 1 Champions. Lots of good insight into the sport, though admittedly Mark Joerger can be a little cold and unfriendly at times - usually when he's frustrated with someone.
A: Mark J. A little cold and unfriendly? I prefer to think of myself as quite warm... and unfriendly.
A: Mark J. Maybe their parents didn't love them.
- Henry David Thoreau
...but I'm not going to tell you to follow them.
Comment:
mode is funny. [Wilmington, Delaware]
Reply: Mark J. Thanks. There's a team in England that isn't amused.
A: Mark J. There are multiple EV Warrior bike parts suppliers on-line, but none of them list the drive shaft. Try asking in the Motorized Bicycle Forum.
A: My workshop. Ya oughta see it.
A: Mark J. I've got a life, but I almost always 'answer stuff' in less than a day. If that's not fast enough for you, just attach a $20 bill to your question.
A: Mark J. It's not so much 'where' as 'when'. The Combat Robot Hall of Fame opens for balloting in August of odd-numbered years. At that time the voting details are released to combat robot forums in the US, Europe, and Australia.
The hall has re-opened for membership in August of each odd-numbered year since. Members of the robot building community in North and South America, Europe, India, and Australia voted to induct a net total of fifteen new full members and add twenty-one robots to the honorable mention rolls in these years.
Q: Can you vote for 2 bots in the combat robot hall of fame? [Fairfax, Virginia]
A: You may list as many robots as you like on your ballot. When the Combat Robot Hall of Fame is open for nominations in August of odd-numbered years, the voting rules are listed on the balloting webpage. The current rules are as follows:
Membership is open to any robot that ever fought in a combat tournament -- which leaves out 'HellaChopper' so don't even ask..
A: Mark J. So many links to change since I moved to my new URL. I thought Rodger the Web Gerbil had them all sorted, but I just now found him asleep in a pile of shredded Apache Web Server manual. I didn't have the heart to wake him, so I took care of it myself: 68 links in a dozen archive collections now corrected. Flush your cache.
Note Rodger has been busy tweaking the RunAmok.tech site pages to make them more 'mobile friendly'. If you find a page that's a visual abomination on your phone or tablet, be so kind as to drop me a note.
I don't need to control it's speed, I just need to switch it on and off so that it can turn at Max speed in least time and come to rest in least possible time. So please help me with a way just to turn it on and off by a rc mode. Also I have a flysky i6x remote and rx as well so I just need to know about the component which can help me making it on/off with a wireless remote. [Odisha, India]
A: Mark J. I do not offer specific advice about robot weapon systems to builders in India due to my concerns about arena safety in the region.
Q: Yes, thanks Mark. And actually i got something to contol it with simple on-off state. I will be using a suitable SPDT or DPDT to control it. But now its again on braking it. If i do dynamic braking by shorting the terminals , th kinetic energy will dissipate in terms of heat by the motor. So can it burn up the motor by appling brakes in this way? Any other simple way to apply brakes for the weapon so that it can stop within 60sec??
A: Perhaps you missed my earlier statement, or simply chose to ignore it. Let me restate:
I'm quite serious about this. It is only recently that I have returned to answering ANY questions from Indian builders. Do not make me rethink that decision.
A: Mark J. Ask Aaron welcomes questions about Combat Robots -- not ribbon climbers, not obstacle jumpers, not maze runners, not soccerbots, and most certainly not line followers. Ask the event organizer.
A: Mark J. By the numbers...
There are MANY posts in the Ask Aaron archives related to hardening and optimum hardening levels. I am unwilling to search thru the archives for you, and it is a poor student who will ask another to read the book for him.
A: Mark J. You're asking about powering a weapon system -- how is that not a weapon system question?
One of several reasons I stopped answering questions from Indian robot builders was that the great majority of the questions asked were already answered in the Ask Aaron archives and guides. The only help I was offering was to direct them to answers that already existed but for which they were unwilling to search.
If you had searched 'Ask Aaron' before the first time you asked for help you would have found a quick answer to your question in the 'Ask Aaron: Solenoid Control FAQ' -- to which I sent you when I found time to answer. Now you ask me again for help, and the answer (with a diagram) is the first entry in that very same source.
I'd say that went poorly. I suppose it was worth a try, but I won't be trying it again anytime soon.
A: Mark J. Whatever may happen, 'Ask Aaron' will not vanish from the web. You can follow the history of the site from almost day one at 'The Wayback Machine':
A: Mark J. Thank you! I appreciate 'broken link' and bug notices. I've had a hectic week and forgot that my new web server at runamok.tech is more sensitive to link capitalization than was the old server at toast.net. All better now.
A: Mark J. RBI Productions filmed 'Robotica' at the historic Prospect Studios just east of Hollywood. The studios are owned and operated by the Walt Disney Company, and were formerly the west coast headquarters for ABC television.
I kept a journal of the filming that you may find interesting: Robotica Journal.
Q: If Robotica ever gets rebooted, would you create a new version of Run Amok and compete in honor of Aaron?
A: Mark J. Much though Aaron enjoyed competing, he had a greater love of helping people and sharing his knowledge. I believe that Team Run Amok has had a beneficial impact on combat robotics through our efforts to support combat robot builders, and I believe that continuing with those efforts is the best public way for us to honor Aaron.
I would be pleased to support the production of a Robotica reboot, but our team lost its competitive heart. We will not return to competition.
A: Mark J. I suppose. Does it have a bun?
Q: I told you, it's a 1/4 pound hamburger. It has a bun.
A: That makes it easier. You can use my JavaScript Burger Goodness Calculator.
Fill in the blue boxes and click on 'Calculate':
Q: The burger calculator was bad. You should have told me it was bad. You suck.
A: Have a nice day.
See also: The Hamburger is Bad
A: Mark J. You should know - San Diego Chicken.
Q: You know, someone should make a "San Diego Chicken" themed robot. [Asheville, North Carolina]
A: Go right ahead -- but I'd rather see you support your local team mascot.
A: Mark J. Slow down there, Buckaroo. I read on the back of a soup can that Axel is just another of those androids from the future who travel back in time to buy jelly donuts for their depleted energy cells. Perfectly normal. Go back to your room now and take the nice pills the nurse brings you.
A: Mark J. You might have included a link to the diagram. It took me a couple minutes to find it.
The section heading is "simple covalent bonding" and a covalent bond is defined as "a chemical bond that involves the sharing of electron pairs between atoms". It's not a great leap to infer that the crosses are electrons. I don't think you have a future in chemistry -- why don't you go build a robot?
A: Mark J. There is no single time-ordered archive of all 5793 questions at 'Ask Aaron'. When posts 'roll off' the bottom of the main page they are moved to the top of one of the topic archives.
There are search boxes both at the bottom of the main 'Ask Aaron' page and at the top of the Ask Aaron FAQ that allow you to search the archives. A search there for 'Bristol' shows recent archive entries by you in the Robot Design and Construction, Ants, Beetles, and Fairies, and
Robot Weapons archives.
Once in one of the archives you can use your browser to search the page for 'Bristol' or any other phrase you like.
A: Mark J. Why would you be? At its most recent outing [name of furry antweight redacted] marched thru the field and made it to the semi-finals. If you lost because you showed up with an unprepared robot then that's about you, not your opponent.
Judge on performance, not on paradigms. Stop the hate.
A: Mark J. Unlike the many robots that fought once, lost, and were never heard from again - 'Run Amok' had a celebrated career and is now retired.
Q: I don't see how you interpreted my comment about [name of furry antweight redacted] as "hate", though I can definitely say that text doesn't really convey emotion much.
A: Mark J. Wondering if you should be embarrassed by losing to the specific robot mentioned implied that [name of furry antweight redacted] is itself an embarrassingly poor robot. Granted, the robot in question is a 'novelty' entrant, but I don't like picking on someone who may not be here to defend themself. I might normally have let it go, but your question suffered from arriving at the same time as the others in today's group -- which I do think are 'hateish'.
A: Mark J. The Ask Aaron question form does not support attachments. If you want to send me pictures or files you need to put them someplace on the web and send me the link. Dropbox works nicely.
Update I've since added attachment support to the Ask Aaron question form. Feel free to attach photos, drawings, or other files that might clarify your questions.
8 minutes later
Q: Just ignore the question,we ran into some 'problems' and cant make the page.
A: Mark J. According to Wikipedia, 'SFK' can refer to:
A: No.
A: Mark J. I don't get to decide which 'bots get into The Combat Robot Hall of Fame -- I just count up the votes.
Votes are based on:
Q: And last question: What happened to Team Insanity's website? How did it got dark?
The resource-packed website provided by Total insanity Combat Robotics shut down in October of 2015. Most of the content is still accessable from the Internet Archive: Archived T.i. Combat Robotics. However, the Archive does not have a copy of the popular T.i. Four Bar Lifter Simulator.
With the permission of the simulator's author Adam Wrigley, Team Run Amok has created a 'mirror' of the Four Bar page where you can download the simulator software.
A: Mark J. 'Run Amok' has earned a graceful retirement. She won't be back.
A: Mark J. No problems on this end, no other reports of problems from outside, and this post got thru. I don't have an explanation for your difficulty.
Q: Would you consider [name redacted] to be an obscure robot that only entered one event and disappeared, or is it too soon for that since its first event was less than a month ago? [Illinois]
A: Mark J. The rule [see FAQ #32] applies to an "obscure old robot that fought only once and lost". The robot in question is a FingerTech 'Viper' kit with the spinner weapon add-on. Combat record: 1 win, 1 loss. So far pretty 'obscure' and mostly 'uninteresting', but not 'old'. Certainly failing to fight in the last couple weeks doesn't qualify as 'disappeared'.
A:
A: Mark J. The 'early access' version of 'Robot Arena 3: Create.Destruction' rushed out two weeks ago (May 26, 2016) is clearly a beta release: incomplete and bug-riddled. There have been two updates already. I suspect the developers were under pressure to get something out prior to the start of BattleBots season two on ABC.
Releasing the clearly unfinished game has led to really awful reviews and public doubts that the game will ever be playable. I can't recommend purchasing at this time, but I'll reserve judgement and wait for a 'final' version of the game before I comment further.
A: Mark J. I used to have a cowboy hat with a cartoonish foam plastic chicken head, wings, and tail sticking out from the crown. A man once took out a camera and motioned to me to turn a bit so he could get his shot.
He replied, "If he didn't want his picture taken, he wouldn't be wearing a chicken on his head."
The correct method to support a shaft bearing a heavy load is to support the shaft on each side of the load with a bearing. You've already seen the result of inadequate support -- a bent shaft.
It's effectively impossible to machine an adapter with sufficient precision to support the far end of a shaft without creating a binding issue. Knowing as little as I do about your drive, I can only recommend that you source a motor with a long enough shaft to use a bearing block for support on the far side of the pulley.
A: Mark J. Aaron's musical tastes were from an earlier time. He enjoyed Ray Charles, The Blues Brothers, Jimmy Hendrix, and Roy Orbison.
A: Mark J. Aaron wrote a haiku that covers this:
Robot haiku:
The least you could do is re-word your assignment before you send it to me. Start your research here: Optimum Robot Drivetrain Gearing.
A: Mark J. So you want to play to the crowd, do you?
P.S not a "fanboy", just a person who enjoys discussing robots.
A: Mark J. You're gonna get me in trouble. The topics in robot combat that I believe are worth a good arguement are topics that the robot community doesn't like to discuss. Here are a few:
Because of your website and teachings and watching many competitions and participating i have a fair amount of knowledge at my disposal. I could complete any of the designs the teams come up with within 4 months start to finish and feel bad because there is so much the underclassmen do not know. Their lack of understanding and ability to focus on the important parts of the robot (proper belt tension, actually driving before the competition, etc) and inability to complete a design in a reasonable time saddens me as many good robots have never been built simply because of time management. You and google and myself, and my tech teacher can always offer knowledge but ability to properly budget time for the design process is needed. I don't know how to convey this.
First designs actually begin in October and competition is in April. Many groups get lost in the virtual engineering and never get around to ordering parts and actually building the robot. Do you have a suggestion how to fix this problem or can you offer a suggested time table given the club is strictly afterschool from 2 until 4? Your help is appreciated as I am just trying to help others. [Pennsylvania]
A: Mark J. It's relatively simple to tell someone how to do something, but infusing someone with lasting enthusiasm is a more difficult challenge. Although the best teachers can do this it seems to be more a talent than a skill. While I don't claim expertise in this area there are some well-known general guidelines for keeping groups moving forward:
Q: Hi Mark. Thanks for all the advice. You have some really good ideas that I hadn't even thought about and I consider myself to be an out of the box thinker. I totally agree, competition is helpful but I would also include overall teamwork as a club so groups help each other. This was absent in my freshman year and I have been striving to get that specific point across.
There is just one more specific question I have. The groups as previously mentioned always get caught up in the virtual design, not on ordering parts and problem solving in 3D. We utilize the software Inventor. The advice everyone gives the groups is to finalize their design then order parts. This is done in minute detail and then parts never get ordered and the got ultimately just becomes a box.
I am the only one that suggests to only make rough dimensions of your parts, do a rough layout in person, and readjust size and material accordingly. Not to shape the weapon at all, only as a square or circle maybe with a few holes, definitely not to make an assembly file, and to just utilize the software to give a rough weight estimate. Am I wrong in doing so?
Thanks again. I know your website is more directed to robot engineering and building not teaching others but I appreciate your feedback.
A: It sounds to me like your CAD software is more of a hindrance than a help. It isn't 'AutoCAD Club', so if the software is getting in the way of project completion you need to clamp down on it. You genuinely do not need software to build a successful beetleweight combat robot, and you certainly don't need a refined engineering drawing before you order parts. Give 'em ten days to come up with their plans anyway they want (pencil sketch, cardboard cutouts, CAD) and pull the plug on the design phase.
A: Mark J. See Frequently Asked Questions #30. Here's a link to the archived inertia-labs site: Inertia Labs.
How come that I so much like your machine
you have super [Prague, Czech Republic]
A: Mark J. Ummm... thanks. I'll pass on your comments to Paul Ventimiglia.
Q: Can you explain the gyroscopic effect on a bot??? [Pasadena, California]
A: Not if you put three question marks on it -- that makes it three times as hard. Let me try editing...
Q: Can you explain the gyroscopic effect on a bot?? [Pasadena, California]
A: Nope, still too hard...
Q: Can you explain the gyroscopic effect on a bot? [Pasadena, California]
A: Ahhh, that's got it! Much better.
Mark J. Now, are you asking for an explanation of:
Technically it's the same effect, but the explanations and diagrams are different. I kinda hope it's the first choice because I had that diagram drawn and the answer largely complete before I considered the alternative question. I'll put that diagram in here just because it's kinda pretty and I'd hate to see it go to waste.
Write back and let me know which question you're asking.
['Pasadena' never wrote back -- anyone else curious about this?]
A: Mark J. It's August and it's an odd-numbered year [2015]. Yes, nominations for membership in The Combat Robot Hall of Fame are open. Notifications and instructions on voting have been posted to robot builder forums in the US, the UK, Australia, and India. Balloting will close on August 15th and the results will be announced on August 17th.
The Hall traditionally seeks votes from robot builders rather than robot fans, and I choose not to post voting information on Ask Aaron.
A: Mark J. Well, I can't recommend that you mention your 'ability to use the internet effectively' or 'independent work ethic'. Maybe a few words on your 'talent in involving other people' would be appropriate?
A: Mark J. You mean this K'nex Spider?
That really doesn't qualify as a combat robot question, but the link above may help. Good luck!
...and that sort of stuff. In his reply, Aaron said they would've been funnier had he not received at least one serious version of every question except the pleo one. This, I absolutely have to see. Could you give an example of the "serious versions" of those questions Aaron got asked? It seems too funny to be true.
P.S. Whatever its flaws, I'm super happy that Battlebots is back on air and did well in the ratings on its first show. [Oakland, California]
A: Mark J. Almost any question can be re-phrased to sound ridiculous. For example, your request can be reworded as:
That would qualify it as a prime example of the type of question you're asking about. It's much funnier when it's not your own question. I don't know which specific posts Aaron was referencing, and if I did I'd prefer to not further embarrass the original question submitters.
If you'd like to search for yourself, I suspect that many of the questions that inspired the satire might be found in this archive. You'll also want to read the entirety of Aaron's Greatest Hits.
P.S. -- Aaron was a much nicer human being than I am. I'm trying to follow his kind example, but I do better some days than others. I'm sorry if you find my response 'cheeky'.
A: Mark J. Googlw?? I think you just invented it.
A: Mark J. If you have to ask me, no.
A: Mark J. No - not without Aaron.
Anyways, I just wanted to let you know Mark, that your website is one of the most valuable resources available to Indian Combat Roboteers. I highly respect and admire your decision to continue this website even though you were devastated because of Aaron's demise. I'm sure that's what Aaron wanted, and he's smiling from the Heavens to see "Ask Aaron" growing bigger and popular day by day. Regards, Las Vegas. [Niedersachsen, Germany]
Mark J. Thank you, Las Vegas. There were people kind enough to answer some of our questions when we got our start in combat robotics, and we put 'Ask Aaron' together to pay that favor forward. I'm very pleased that you and others have found our information and advice to be helpful.
Note: 'Las Vegas' earned his nickname here because even though he was in India his internet service went thru a server in Nevada. For quite a while we labeled his location as 'Las Vegas' until he cleared up the situation for us. Now his emails are being routed thru Germany. He claims to actually be in Niedersachsen, but I've given up on trying to figure out where he really is.
A: Mark J. 'Original Sin' has proven itself to be a very durable competitor. I don't have a record of reason for loss in each individual match, but I wrote to Original Sin's builder Gary Gin to ask if the Combots Cup loss to 'Electric Boogaloo' was the first due to internal failure:
A: Mark J. Just long enough - if you're lucky.
- Mark Joerger
A: Mark J. We were looking forward to it! We had two heavyweight robots, twin European frequency R/C radios, a pair of shipping crates, and plans for upgrades. All we were waiting for was the word.
There were many rumors about a third televised season of Robot Wars: Extreme Warriors. Robot combat icon Dan Danknick was told by the Robot Wars production crew to get ready to organize the American competitors for a new series. There were also reports of a robot arena being built at Universal Studios for filming the future series. We thought it was a sure thing, but it didn't come to pass.
Our heavyweight lifter 'The Gap' still sits on a raised platform in a corner of the workshop, right next to our retired champion 'Run Amok'. 'The Gap' only needs a new set of batteries and a full tank of CO2 and it's ready to go -- but it wouldn't be any fun without Aaron.
A: Mark J. ...build combat robots? Not any, that I know of.
Q: 5. In what sense did the "Sixties" begin before 1960 and continue beyond 1970? What events might one choose to define the beginning and the end of a "long Sixties," and why? [San Francisco, California]
A: Mark J. I've got an uncle who took a bad fall on an icy sidewalk. He believes to this day that Nixon is still the President. It'll be 1969 for him until our robot overlords arrive to set us free. Does that help?
A: Mark J. Aaron listed his favored driving exercises in this archived post.
Equally important to getting your driving practice is to tweak the transmitter settings to make the radio interface comfortable for the driver. In combat your nerves will be on edge and a too-responsive robot will become impossible to control. See our transmitter set-up tips in the Run Amok R/C Transmitter Programming Guide.
I would first like to thank you for this wonderful website that you and Aaron were able to create. It has been an invaluable resource to builders all across the world. I am sorry to hear about Aaron's passing and I will keep your family in thoughts and prayers. [Maryland]
Mark J. Thank you for your kind compliments and compassion. Aaron would be pleased to hear that our work here is appreciated.
A: Mark J. If it was designed by an 'average' robot combat builder:
A: Mark J. Algebra homework? No robots? Sigh... just for fun:
If the two points are on the line described by the equation, they must both satisfy that equation. We'll substitute the given x and y and solve the equation to get a and b:
...so, a = 11.
...add 7 to each side of the equation to get
...and divide each side of the equation by 3 to get
...so, b = 5.
A: Mark J. Lightweight 'GLaDOS' is the most recent robot from the very successful Team Adrenaline -- a group of students from Olathe Northwest High School in Olathe, Kansas. They have no connection to VALVe.
A: Mark J. Many opinions, but no question.
A: Mark J. The level of sportsmanship at combat robot events is generally quite high, but I don't believe that any competitive activity is completely free of poor sportsmanship. I wasn't present at the Battlerat vs. Nightmare match and so cannot comment on any editing of the post-match comments, but I have personally seen much worse behavior at combat events. On one noteworthy occasion police had to be called in to calm things down.
One event actually encouraged a bit of poor sportsmanship. Competitors at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors were asked to 'talk trash' and be openly confrontational with their opponents during interviews. The network (TNN) was trying for a tie-in with professional wrestling and had a well-known wrestler as the host. Some teams played along, some didn't, and a few actually got kinda nasty. It really didn't work, and the trash talk was toned down for the second season.
A: Mark J. We didn't waterproof 'Run Amok' -- it wasn't necessary. The top armor was a single, solid sheet that shed water to the edges like a roof. The only vulnerable components (steering servo, receiver, and speed controller) were all tucked up against the top armor and had their own cases that would resist any random splash. None of the 'bots at 'Robotica' had any trouble with the water.
A: Mark J. You couldn't put in a clip of one of my 'bots, Nate?
I'm always happy to see outreach that may generate some interest from the public. I like your selection of combat clips, and the editing is quite professional. I also like the breakout of the video into sections on history, people, and robots. The only thing I might have wished was that your interview subjects had been a bit more animated -- you needed to interview Stephen Felk!
Never had my own video tribute, and an Ahmet/Dweezil Zappa soundtrack is a big plus! Thanks Alexander...
A: Mark J. Jason Dante Bardis was building a 'bot from scratch to compete at Robotica, but he ran out of time and decided to substitute a very light 'bot that was essentially the chassis for 'Dr. Inferno Jr.' with a carbon fiber wedge added. Although the drivetrain was very powerful (four DeWalt 18v gearmotors running at 24 volts), the robot weighed weighed only 37 pounds. At the weigh-in, Jason walked onto the scale carrying 'Mini Inferno' and was still under-weight! Powerful though it was, Mini just didn't have enough pushing power to be a threat against any of the robotica finalists in a sumo match.
Jason did finish his original Robotica entry and fought with it at BattleBots seasons 3.0 thru 5.0 with limited success. He remarked on a forum post that after he finished 'Towering Inferno' he realized that it would not have been a successful Robotica competitor.
'Killer B', on the other hand, was a very dangerous sumo competitor. Had they put the blunt end of the robot into use instead of the wedge end, they could have used their powerful drivetrain to simply shove 'Run Amok' off the platform. Lucky for me, they didn't choose that option.
A: 'Robotica' called on competitors to answer several differing performance challenges, making it difficult to put together a single optimal design. Rob chose a short wheelbase and a responsive, torquey drivetrain to overcome the 'Gauntlet' and 'Labyrinth' challenges. Although those design choices made the 'bot difficult to control, its maneuverability and power made it a strong competitor in the non-sumo parts of the competition.
I didn't have the opportunity to drive the courses for Robotica 2.0 and 3.0, but given the success of competitors returning from Season 1.0 I'd have to guess that the level of challenge was similar.
The only other Munson/Roski robot worth mention is 'Ginsu'. There were several quite different versions of Ginsu with the sole unifying design element being the use of circular saw blades for wheels. Although none of the Ginsu versions ever won a match in open competition, they are well remembered for their exhibition matches against Jay Leno's 'Chin-Killa'.
Q: And about Overkill -- I always think one of the main reasons why it could beat a lot of powerful spinning blades is that its structure could absorb the high energy of spinning weapons well and being able to survive those deadly blows. Am I right? [Chinese Forum]
A: Mark J. If you watch the fights 'Overkill' had against powerful spinners (Mechavore, Warhead, M.O.E.) you'll see that Overkill never actually takes a big hit from a spinner weapon. Christian Carlberg was a good strategic driver, and he new how to stay away from a dangerous weapon and wait for the right time to attack. Often, he was able to stay away from a spinner long enough for a battle-weakened weapon to fail and then move in for a victory.
'Overkill' was well built and very maneuverable, but I think Christian's driving was the the strength.
Q: A question about the famous moment when 'Mechavore' tore BioHazard's lifting arm completely off in the BattleBots 5.0 quarter final. Some say the reason was that BioHazard's lifting mechanism wasn't strong enough, but I think it was just an unlucky hit. Mechavore's blade hit the exposed arm of BioHazard at the worst time and in the worst spot. No lifting mechanism can survive that kind of blow. What's your opinion, Mark? [Chinese Forum]
A: Mark J. I'll agree with you on this question. It simply isn't possible to make every component of your robot strong enough to survive every possible attack and still make the weight limit. The more vulnerable pieces of the lifting arm are usually tucked safely away under protective armor, but they must be exposed in operation. Mechavore got in a 'lucky punch', but BioHazard went on to win the match and the championship.
Q: can i eat [Los Angeles, California]
A: Mark J. You typed 'Robot That Answers Your Questions' into Bing and blindly accepted the link that popped up, ignoring all the signs on this site that this is where I answer your questions about combat robots, and that I am not a robot that answers your questions.
Does no one in California know how to conduct a proper web search?
[San Francisco, California]
A: Mark J. I guess that answers my question about Californians and web searches. Pro bono publico:
Since y = x - 5, we can substitute x - 5 for the y in the first equation:
Add 5 to each side of the equation:
And divide both sides by 3:
Now substitute 5 for x in the second equation:
y = 0
Which gives the simultaneous solution to both equations, expressed as an ordered pair:
Now, go build a robot.
A: Mark J. Many robots have computer processors that control at least some of their actions, but modern automobiles also have on-board computers that control many of their systems. Like an automobile, a robot not a computer - it is a machine that may be controlled by computers.
A: Mark J. Tough question.
UPDATE: Gary Gin wrote back with some info on 'Original Sin 2'. OS2 was based on a Heavyweight BattleKit chassis. Although the BattleKits were based on the chassis used by BioHazard, they are a bit taller and use 4" diameter wheels. That places the height of OS2 about 1" taller than BioHazard.
The height order - tallest to shortest: Panic Attack Gold, Original Sin 2, Brutality, BioHazard.
Mark J. I think it's very clear that 'Ask Aaron' answers questions about combat robots, but I get a steady flow of questions from web-stumblers who miss all the clues and ask an off-base question that any search engine could handle nicely. I kinda enjoy them, but usually don't post answers. I'm gonna pick one from time to time to feature.
A: Mostly Cajun Crabgrass, Bayou Begonias, and Zydeco Weeds. See also: Louisiana Wetland Plantlife.
A: Mark J. I don't give out compliments lightly. Membership in the Combat Robot Hall of Fame is based on four judging factors:
I'd call 38 wins, 0 losses, and 11 consecutive tournament victories 'dominating'.
2) Pioneering or perfecting influential designs
Most of the questions I get from India are either asking how to build a drumbot or how to defeat a drumbot. I'd say that's major influence.
3) Having great fan or entertainment appeal
Tell me that Indian robot fans don't run for a good view of the arena when one of your matches is announced.
4) Otherwise making a lasting impact on the sport
India is the hottest growth market in combat robotics, and your success is driving that expansion. Your team is also a driving member of the effort to improve spectator and competitor safety at events in your country.
Voting doesn't open for another 18 months, and I get only one vote -- but if 'Rust in Peace' isn't a strong contender for the Hall I don't know who is.
A: Mark J. Apparently not old enough to be trusted out on the internet by yourself.
The 'Ask Aaron' project was important to Aaron, and I have decided to continue the site in his memory. Thank you for the many kind messages of sympathy and support that have found their way to me.
- Mark Joerger, Team Run Amok
When I was in the fifth grade, my family went to a robotics competition called Robogames. There I saw bots ranging from miniscule 5-ounce fairyweights to 340- pound super heavyweight behemoths– custom built radio-controlled machines designed to battle each other in a bulletproof arena. Each robot could have weapons ranging from flippers to spinning blades. I was fascinated by the creativity of the builders and of course the action and sparks, so the next day I ordered parts for a small one -pound robot. One problem though: I had no idea where to start!
It was at that time I found Ask Aaron. Emails were sent to experienced builders on the subject of what parts to buy with no avail. So I submitted a pressing question of mine on Aaron's site and the next day– Voilà, an answer! Over the next couple of weeks, Aaron unknowingly received almost 20 questions from me, all answered with an insightful and very helpful response or tip such as “cheap and combat robotics don't mix.” After school every day, I went straight to Aaron's website to check if he responded to any new questions. Each of his replies increased my knowledge about building and helped develop my thought process and researching skills. Reading questions from others and the responses Aaron gave even helped me to write more concise and easy to understand questions.
With all that I have learned, I've been able to advise other battlebot enthusiasts with their questions ranging from naïve to unconventional. On the Robot Fighting League online forum, a fellow builder needed help choosing brushless motors for his bot. With the understanding of these motors Aaron helped me to comprehend, I recommended the Turnigy 1900kv Outrunner, a combat proven and inexpensive motor, as well as tips on products to avoid.
My battlebot fleet has become a force to be reckoned with, thanks in part to Aaron. He is an inspiration, taking precious time out of his busy life to respond to the countless questions people have submitted from all over the world. It almost makes me guilty; I've probably asked nearly 100 questions. But I have also been able to take the knowledge I have received and share it with others. I enjoy helping people and having my opinions respected by others, especially since all my robot colleagues are much older than me! I am passing on the information and even getting my friends and teachers interested with all that Aaron has taught me -- my ally in the digital age.
A: Mark J. Thank you. It's very good to hear that Aaron's efforts were appreciated and that they had a positive effect on others. I've got something to send to you -- watch your mailbox.
A: Congratulations, you've made magnesium oxide.
A: I've read thru your question several times and can't find anything in it that relates to combat robots. Maybe you can find a website called 'Ask Some Guy About Sand'?
Robot haiku:
A: I don't know of any Team Velocity robot named simply 'Velocity'.
Robot haiku:
Q: Dear Aaron, I know that Team Velocity has a robot called Trilocity. Do you have any information about it? Are there any videos? [China]
A:This time you got it right! We know 'Trilocity' -- we fought it at one of the DaVinci Days events (we won!). 'Trilocity' is a beetleweight thwackbot with an overall record of 9 wins / 5 losses. It's very difficult to get a twackbot to work in a small insect arena, but 'Trilocity' was quite successful due to a well thought-out design and a great deal of drive power.
I don't know of any available videos.
Robot haiku:
A: Chris still drives for Team Raptor. He drove 'Preda Raptor' for its recent TV appearance on 'Lab Rats', and I believe he is tagged to drive at the 2013 Robogames.
Robot haiku:
A: Not that I know of -- but there is a featherweght from Team Toon named 'TinyHurtz' that is an almost perfect miniature version of 'TerrorHurtz' from Team Hurtz.
Robot haiku:
A: No. We don't have rights to sell or distribute copyrighted television material. See #13.
Robot haiku:
A: Impatient? The contest just closed 12 hours ago!
Well, the judges have spoken and results are now up on the haiku contest page, where you can also read the entries.
Robot haiku:
A: Sorry, but I can't accept your verse in the [March, 2013] Combat Robot Haiku contest -- you got the syllable count way wrong, so it isn't haiku. You're welcome to try again.
A: Much better. Next time remember to include your contact info and I'll add it to the entries.
A: Even granting poetic license, that makes zero sense.
Many robot builders use cheap parts from HK. Feel free to use them if you like. I think they're probably fine for a little R/C project you're going to play with in the local park, but not for combat competition. Quality control is awful, shafts aren't hardened, weak magnets aren't glued in securely, specifications are questionable, documentation is unintelligible, and customer support doesn't exist. I'll pass.
Robot haiku:
A: Previously answered. We consider ourselves 'active' even though there has not been an official Team Run Amok entry in a competition for some time. For reasons of confidentiality we will not confirm or deny our involvement with any specific robots fielded by any specific teams, but we will admit to still being 'out there'.
Robot haiku:
A: If you're asking about combat robots, I'd estimate somewhere close to 200 currently active robots of all weight classes combined based on recent event reports.
The International Federation of Robotics estimates that there were more than 14,000 multipurpose industrial robots in the UK in 2012.
I can't even guess at how many household and hobby robots there might be.
Robot haiku:
A: Mark J. here: Team Inferno did not complete the robot they were building for Robotica in time an had to 'punt'. Jason showed up with 'Mini Inferno', which was essentially the base from their lightweight champion 'Dr. Inferno Jr.'. Mini had plenty of horsepower, supplied by four overvolted DeWalt drill motors, but it weighed only 37 pounds and was therefore incapable of generating a whole lot of pushing power.
It would have been an elephant vs. mouse battle. With 'Run Amok's wedge off, I wouldn't have been able to touch Mini with anything but my tires -- so the wedge would have had to stay on. I would have needed to scrounge a strip of scrap metal to add to the front of the wedge to lower it enough to be effective against Mini. It certainly wouldn't have been an easy fight, since Mini was much more maneuverable than 'Run Amok'.
Robot haiku:
A: Taz is good, but consider Hazard, Blendo, Mauler, Panzer, Ziggo, or Mechadon.
A: Green, no -- yellow, yes: AMOK vending robot video.
COMBAT robot questions, please.
A: More than I have time or inclination to write here. Would you care to narrow your question?
A: 'The Finalizer' was built by BattleBots veteran Zack Bieber ('El Diablo', 'El Diablo Grande') of The Machine Lab for a Florida software consulting company called APSOFT that implemented their own custom control system. Microsoft kicked in some of the funding.
In spite of what the article says about competing in robot combat (it never did), the robot was not intended to be 'combat worthy'. It was a show 'bot, built purely as a demonstration platform for the mechanical control applications of the Microsoft .NET Compact Framework software. I think it served that function rather well, getting a good deal of press coverage.
A: Replace the passengers with robots. Robots are very patient and will not complain about a slow trip, and robots are also able to resist high acceleration. Lift gearing is no longer critical, which is fortunate since you gave me no motor data.
ROBOT questions, please!
A: I can tell you that 'NST' is a two-wheeled horizontal bar spinner built by Sam Smith, formerly of Team Tiberius. Construction details can be found at the NST topic section of the FRA Forum. There are also many videos of 'NST' at the 2010, 2011, and 2012 Featherweight Championships available on YouTube.
A: The best I can do is a photo of Andrew Lindsey's 'Spike' as it appeared at the 1996 Robot Wars as a non-autonomous featherweight. Although autonomous classes were planned for the 1995 Robot Wars event, the number and quality of entries were insufficient and no autonomous classes competed.
You can see 'Spike' being pummeled by 'KMM' in this video of the 1996 Robot Wars Featherweight Melee. It appears to have a wedge on one end and a lifter on the other.
Andrew didn't share much info about his 'bots, so I don't have any construction details for either the autonomous or conventional versions of 'Spike'.
A: All the 'Panzer' series robots shared the same six-wheel chassis and overvolted 'Black Max' drive motors. The major differences appeared to be in weapon configuration, with versions Mk 2 thru Mk 4 having variations of a positionable front plow. You can see the differences in this slideshow of the Mk 1 thru Mk 4 versions of 'Panzer'.
Note: 'Panzer' also fought as 'Wrath' at Season 5.0 of BattleBots (May 2002 - 3 wins, 1 loss), and as 'Panzer Mk 4.5' at RoboJoust IV (November 2002 - heavyweight champion) - no photos available.
A: Keep plenty of snack food and energy drinks on hand and watch this video:
A: Why ask us? Try Doc Fizzix Mousetrap Car Basics.
A: Our strategy was never really a secret, but 'classified' sounded better than 'wait for the other guy to make a mistake' so we wrote that down.
A: Bodies are over-rated -- just go with the arms and legs.
Q: Where do I go to fight my combat robot?
A: Try one of those tough robot bars on the wrong side of the tracks. Make a remark about the batteries on the waitress.
A: Zpatula would need more than a few updates, but the design is sound.
A: Hard to say. Batteries and motors were surplus, custom hubs made by a friend, some aluminum we already had in the shop, radio gear borrowed from 'Run Amok', Colson wheels, and a few bucks for wire and connectors. It may have been the least expensive 'bot we ever built.
A: We've played Bot Hockey against Adam Conus and 'Mission Control'. My advice: do not play Bot Hockey against 'Mission Control' -- MC just grabs the puck and leaves.
Q: Could you tell me a bit more about MC? They competed recently right by me so I think I will be faceing them in an upcoming tournament.
A: Most of what I can tell you about MC can be better seen in a video. The lifting clamp is servo-powered and is most effective when it can get in 'deep'. It can't lift effectively if it just gets a grip near the edge of your 'bot.
A: No, and no.
A: Mark J. here: sometimes people include their location with their questions. Other times something about the question interests me and I take a minute to look up the source location. If I think that location is relevant I may tag the question. It's kinda random.
A: I'll put that on my résumé. You're welcome.
A: All except #10 (BattleBots competitors) and #21 (Team Plumb Crazy) happened to us. There is very little exaggeration.
Q: So then what was that expensive and hard to locate part you didn't need anymore for your bot in Battbotica Wars?
A: It was a pressure relief valve for the pneumatic system on our heavyweight 'The Gap' that would blow off pressure above 800 PSI; supposedly required for UK industrial safety regulations. Very nice machine work. It's still on a shelf in our shop.
A: 'Electric Boogaloo' (video) is a new heavyweight vertical spinner from Offbeat Robotics. EB did very well at Robogames 2012, finishing second.
A: I'm told that the best way to screw up a perfectly nice hobby is to try to turn it into a career. My future lies elsewhere.
A: 'Rat Amok' - champion of the 2002 Da Vinci Games - was almost all wood. All of our robots have a small bit of wood somewhere, as a salute to 'Run Amok'.
A: No need to flatter us -- we give our best advice to anyone who asks.
I use all of those practice exercises, and if I'm having trouble with a specific maneuver I'll stop and tweak the transmitter settings to make the control feel more natural. This process takes time, and every robot has different driving challenges.
Practice until you don't even have to think about what you're doing.
A: Ummm... 'cause a banana would look stupid on my hat?
A: I can think of a few.
There are a few posts about multibots in the archive.
A: The last time we tried this poll (search this archive for 'prettiest') we learned that there is no agreement on this topic. I don't see any reason to try it again.
Q: I think the 'prettiest bot' poll might work because it could be held differently, use ten robots on a ballot, give it a week, give it two weeks, first robot to have 10 votes win. That might work, a little trial and error in designing this poll might be helpful.
A: Mark J. here: given the results of the previous poll, we wouldn't even get agreement on the ten robots to go on the ballot. Instead of votes we'd get:
Figuring out who has the prettiest 'bot doesn't appear on our Mission Statement and it doesn't help builders make more successful combat machines. We've spent enough time on it already.
A: No relation -- except that neither of their claw weapons worked.
David Hall's 'De Claw' (photo at right) was a complex and very expensive heavyweight entry for Robotica series 3. The exotic claw weapon never worked at the event, but the powerful 'shufflebot' drive train still made it a formidable competitor.
Team Run Amok's 'The Robot That Never Was' was built for a design concept photo as part of the team's application to Robotica series 1. Its claw weapon was never wired into the robot control system, and it never competed anywhere. To the best of my knowledge, David Hall ever saw our design concept.
A: Mark J. here: that would be Aaron Maxwell Joerger, who at the time preferred to be called 'Max'.
A: A combat robot is a tool for defeating other robots. The best tools are simple, reliable, and easy to use.
A: I'll give you four classic fights I really like and save you the trouble of looking them up:
A: Previously answered -- search this archive for "Why don't you guys".
A: Team Run Amok built its first combat robot in 2001. Our history with non-combat robotics goes back several more years, and our experience with electric motors and control systems goes back much farther.
A: Sorry, we don't run fantasy matches here at Ask Aaron: see #33.
A: The multiple references to hobbyweight robot 'Fiasco' in the Builders Database are confusing, but I think I can clear it up:
A: Hard? If you're asking about our Team Run Amok hats -- a few dozen. We ordered five dozen and there's one box of 12 still on the shelf.
A: Team Run Amok's retired hobbyweight 'Nasty Glass of Water' [picture at right] measured in at 17 inches long by 17 inches wide by 5 inches tall.
A: The Razer / Tornado debate came about from a combination of a gimmicky arena and an unforeseen event allowed by the rules. Rabid fans tossed about accusations of 'cheating' without bothering to read the rules and the whole thing got out of control. I don't see that happening under current conditions.
A: Well, New York, you've put in a good share in the recent past. More generally, our readers and questions come from around the globe -- see the map at the bottom of the Ask Aaron homepage.
I don't generally track question sources unless I'm particularly curious. A quick look at our recent questions shows a lot of activity from Indonesia and west coast USA, but that varies wildly.
A: See #30. Note that the list is no longer updated and is useful only for 'classic' teams. For current teams, just use your favorite search engine.
A: Sorry, I don't share personal details here at Ask Aaron.
A: 'Phoenix' is a sportsman pneumatic flipper. I can only comment on what I've seen in the videos. It appears to be difficult to drive [poor radio mixing set-up] and the flipping power is only just adequate. I'd rate it average.
Q: I saw Phoenix as well at the Franklin, and it seemed good, but what would consitute as an amazing 30lb flipper bot?
A: A top-flight flipper has:
Q: Do you have a picture of Phoenix?
A: How about videos? Here's 'Phoenix' looking pretty good and wining, and here's 'Phoenix' looking poor in a loss.
A: I'm not doing your homework assignment for you, but I'll get you started. Aluminum has a density of 2.7 g/cm3, so you've got 2 cubic centimeters of metal spread out over 1000 square centimeters of area. The remaining math is trivial.
A: Commas, periods, and question marks are not HTML characters. You're probably trying to cut-and-paste from a document created by a word processor. Just type your question directly into the entry box and you'll have no trouble.
A: Do you have any siblings that show normal social development, or is your entire family a waste of air?
A: The coolrobots site is down and gone for good. You can still access an archive of the old site. Christian Carlberg has a new site, but without any combat robot content.
Q: Dear Aaron, why did they shut cool robots down? Thanks
A: Christian Carlberg has always been focused on making money from his robot skills. He gathered some serious sponsorships when robots were big with the media and worked hard to keep his image marketable. His new website is focused on commercial robotics applications, and I assume that he does not want the old website around to distract from his new 'corporate' image.
Q: A) Does Christian Calberg still do any combat robots? B) What does he do with the other robots that he has now? C) Is he no longer accepting any questions about combat robots?
A: A) Not since 2003, unless you count this. B) He builds them to order and sells them. C) Try asking him - contact email is on his current website.
A: Mark J. here: I don't know what motivates people to support a specific robot -- I just count the votes. I can tell you that 'The Master' received good support from US voters and a big chunk of votes from the UK to push it over the top.
I can also tell you that a lot of forum 'chatter' does not translate into votes. It does no good to talk about it if you don't get around to actually voting, and a lot of the forum posters simply don't vote.
Finally, a lot of votes come in from people who do not actively post on the forums. The lurkers have power!
A: Mark J. here: they may have just grown restless waiting for the new season of 'Beavis and Butt-head', but I suspect that somebody changed their medication.
A: Mark J. here: don't waste your time trying to troll me, wanker.
Q: I am building a robot similar to your bot, 'Runaway'. What can I do to keep it from failing like 'Runaway' did?
A: Mark J. here: a hearty traditional New Jersey greeting to you as well!
'Run Away' was built on short notice to get us to England and put on a good show. It earned $4000 in appearance money, and got us free transport to England with hotel, meals, and pocket money -- twice. It appeared on international television, fought in the 'Tag Team' finals, and lived to tell the tale. I consider 'Run Away' to be a complete success, but I would not recommend that it be used as a model for a 'real' combat robot.
Our combat record speaks for itself: We have finished on the podium at more than half the events we have entered. Few teams can make that statement. We answer questions about combat robots to the best of our ability -- you my take our advice or not, as you like.
A: Hey, Saxon -- good to hear from you! How's life in Tacoma?
I'm sorry to say that organized robot competitions in the Pacific Northwest are few and far between -- particularly for the big robots I like to fight. But stop by my place and we can have a robot sumo match on the dining room table.
A: The Combat Robot Hall of Fame opens for nominations in August of odd-numbered years. Announcements of open nomination with instructions for sending in a ballot for 2011 can be found in the Robot Fighting League and Fighting Robot Association forums.
We don't give voting information here on 'Ask Aaron' because this site gets a lot of general-public exposure and we're looking for input from the robot builder community. If you're interested in voting, I suggest you hurry to the forums -- time is very short.
[Voting is now closed for 2011]
A: Use a loud voice and hold a big hammer in one hand. If you don't get an answer, strike the robot with the hammer and ask again.
What are the differences and similarities of Bad Attitude and Double Agent?
A: Mark J. here: we don't answer 'tell me all about my favorite old BattleBot' questions. We aren't fanboys.
A: It's been a while since Jim updated the robot descriptions on his site. 'Breaker Box' did start out as a middleweight, but it has obviously beefed up to take on the heavyweight division. Given that it finished 3rd at RoboGames (the TV show lied), it's doing a very good job!
I was reading up on the flipper section and I came across the robot by the name of 'Matadore.' Do you have any videos of this bot? I thought it looked so cool.
Thank you
A: Heavyweight flipper 'The Matador' from Inertia Labs was pretty cool. The builders claimed 20,000 pounds of force from the twin pneumatic rams. Record: 4 wins, 2 losses. A quick search on YouTube for 'Matador robot' turned up a couple videos.
A: The last combat event we entered was a 1200 mile road trip that soaked up six days. The competitors were treated poorly by the event organizers, the atmosphere was chaotic, and the whole vibe was off. There are a lot of other things we would rather have done with the time and money involved.
We would be pleased to support a local event, but those have all dried up. We have battle-ready robots just waiting for the right circumstances to blow the dust off and kick some butt, but we aren't going to drag ourselves cross-country for a couple of robot matches in some shabby warehouse.
A: 'Nasty Glass of Water' was a hobbyweight robot we built for the September 2001 NERC Hobby Expo event in Chicago. A photo and short description is in this archive -- search for "hobby expo".
A: It's a very long drive to Pennsylvania from Oregon - we have no plans to attend the next NERC Motorama Robot Conflict.
We did compete at the September 2001 NERC Hobby Expo event in Chicago with our hobbyweight 'Nasty Glass of Water'. We had flown a lot that year and had a couple of free 'flight miles' tickets to use up. Fun event! Search this archive for "hobby expo" for a short write-up.
A: No. 'Run Amok' is too fragile to face the current mega-weapons. She was built for a very different style of combat.
Q: Will The Gap ever compete at Robogames?
A: That's a long drive for a robot fight. We have no current plans to compete at RoboGames.
A: 'Run Amok' retired in 2002 after Robot Wars Extreme Warriors season 2 -- see the Run Amok retirement webpage. Our current heavyweight 'The Gap' did not compete at Combots or RoboGames.
A: Hidden away down at the very bottom of the this archive page is the secret 'Robot Arena 2' Q&A section. Links to RA2 resources can be found there. We are no longer current on RA2 extensions; it would be best to visit the RA2 forum.
A: Mark J. here: it has been quite some time since we've put on an Antbotica. We always staged Antbotica in conjunction with a traditional combat event, and the lack of nearby combat events has forced Antbotica into hiatus. We still have the arenas and props, and would welcome a chance to put on another Antbotica event.
-little dude.
A: Brandon! Good to hear from you. Drop me your email and we can catch up.
A: Krylon gives a nice, shiny result. Don't eat them, and don't try to feed them to your robot.
A: Mark J. here: quite a few attempts have been made to commercialize robot combat: The Lazy Toad Robot Club and Grill, SlamBot, and 'Battle Ratz' come to mind. None have been particularly successful. If it was still 2001 this could be 'hot', but I'm pretty sure that there isn't enough interest in 'fighting robot birthday parties' for 7 to 11 year-old boys to make any money these days. There's a lot of time, work, and overhead for the price they charge - but I'm glad they're doing it.
A: Sure. Afganistan is a french speaking country in South America, just north of Botswana. Everyone there is left-handed and walks with a limp. Their economy is based on the production of roller skates, whipped cream, and bandages. The great national holiday is 'Platypus Day' (November 4th) when everything orange is set on fire and thrown into the closest river, of which there are none. November 5th is 'Rebuild the Country Day'. If you move there, do not paint your house orange.
A: Servo is a well-written 'personal robotics' magazine that has some coverage of combat robot events and construction in their 'Combat Zone' section. Robot magazine also has some articles on combat design and events.
Scott McCarty published a few issues of 'Combat Robot' magazine back around 2003, but there just wasn't enough content, advertiser support, or reader interest to keep a combat monthly publication afloat. I'd say there's even less interest now.
A: Yes, but they don't think you are.
A: I don't know what Ramiro Mallari is doing these days.
A: You've got part of the story right. Mike Konshak donated Robotica 2 champion 'Flexy Flyer' and MechWars IV HW champion 'Kumite' (Coo-mitt-tay) to the University of Colorado school of computer science. To the best of my knowledge, superheavyweight 'Pro-Am' was dismantled. Most of Robot Dojo's other 'bots were sold to fight another day.
A: Voting for the Combat Robot Hall of Fame opens in August of odd-numbered years. An announcement of voting with details of how to vote will be published in the Robot Fighting League and Fighting Robot Association forums early in that month.
Q: I think a robot to be put in the [combat robot] hall of fame would be Surgical Strike. Do you agree? Why not have Run Amok in the hall of fame?
A: Team Run Amok doesn't get to pick the robots in the Combat Robot Hall of Fame. The votes come in from the robot builder community -- all we do is count them. I'm not going to campaign for (or against) the inclusion of any robot this close to balloting.
A: Click here.
A: Yes, on national television - Robotica finals, The Learning Channel, 2001.
A: Team Rolling Thunder has had time to develop 'Surgical Strike' into a potent hobbyweight since it first fought in 2006. The design is based heavily on featherweight 'Totally Offensive' from Team Mad Overlord, but assorted refinements and add-on bits have given the hobbyweight its own style -- it looks like a toy train that ran into a covered wagon.
With a footprint much larger than most hobbyweights, the robot appears to be easy to control and effective in operation. The attack strategy is simple: point the big weapon at your opponent and move toward them.
Pieces to build your own version of the 'bot are available thru Team Rolling Thunder.
Q: What is your opinion on Near Chaos Robotics' Apollyon and Moros?
A: No, we're not going to play "What's Your Opinion" for every 'bot at Motorama.
A: If a competition comes along that catches our interest, we'll be there. If it requires a new robot, we'll build one.
Q: To expand on your latest question, what would it take to interest you? Another Robotica style event? Something which doesn't revolve around damage?
A: Pretty much anything that doesn't involve locking two robots in a flat bottomed plastic box and having them beat on each other would be a good start. Damage is an integral part of combat robotics, but it doesn't need to be the sole focus.
A: Mark J. here: when we started this website nine years ago robot combat was very different than it is today. The robots have evolved, the event organizers have come and gone, and the types of people building robots are different than they were 'back in the day'. All that makes for a new mix of questions and a new slant on our answers. I don't think our basic views have changed, but robot combat certainly has.
A: 'Upheaval' has proven to be a dominating competitor with a reliable flipper weapon and a sturdy drive train. The extreme forward location of the drive wheels makes it difficult to control -- a gyro might help.
A: All I know about PennBots comes from a video I saw on YouTube. It looked like they were having a good time. Their website needs a lot of work.
A: Try asking your mother.
A: The Combat Robot Hall of Fame voting opens in August of odd-numbered years. Watch the popular builders' forums for the announcement.
A: Sorry, 'Thor' never had a website and the Team Sinister website has no info on 'The Master'. See #30 for tips on finding combat robot websites.
A: You're talking about the Tag Team event in the Nickelodeon Robot Wars? I know exactly what happened to our robot -- but we no longer answer questions about UK Robot Wars.
A: Liverpool.
A: That's easy. It was when she asked, "Would you like to come back to my place?"
A: Run Amok.
A: We consider ourselves 'active' even though there has not been an official Team Run Amok entry in a competition for some time. For reasons of confidentiality we will not confirm or deny our involvement with any specific robots fielded by any specific teams, but we will admit to still being 'out there'.
What's your opinion about middleweight 'HAZARD'?
Is it during that period no one was able to out-think/counter a spinner like by attaching a scoop etc.. or was the design and preparation of HAZARD was (& perhaps is) still the best?
A: There is no question that Tony Buchignani designed, built, prepared, and drove the finest middleweight of its era -- nothing can take that away. Speculating on how 'Hazard' might perform against the current competition and if it is still 'the best' is a game I don't care to play.
A: Decide to build a robot. It's stupid, but it's fun.
A: No. Ken Benner's 'Ill Tempered Mutt' was an approximate middleweight built for Robotica season 2. Jimmy Myers built the much larger superheavyweight 'Bucky the Beaverbot' and fought in BattleBots 4.0 and 5.0. Some similarity in design, but no relationship.
A: I know a robot named 'Malvolio', after the character in 'Twelfth Night' written by some guy named Shakespeare. I would have liked Shakespeare better if he had written about robots. Ray Ebert's 'Malvolio' fought at Robotica season 1 and went on to a fairly long career as a combat middleweight.
A: Team Raptor built a whole series of various 'Raptor' robots: 'Alpha' (BB 1.0), 'Beta' (BB 2.0), 'Carnage' (BB 3.0, 4.0), 'Gamma' (BB 3.0, 4.0, 5.0), 'Pack' (BB 3.0, 4.0, 5.0), 'Rippa' (RWEW 1), 'Tripulta' (BB 3.0, 4.0), and the recent 'Preda' (RoboGames 2010). I don't know of an 'Omega Raptor' built by the team, and I'm not prepared to discuss the differences between each of the versions.
A: Not annoyed, but some of your questions drift dangerously close to being 'fanboy' material. This isn't a fanboy site -- we exist to support builders, to discuss topics important to the future of the sport, and to preserve the history of robot combat. Other robot topics hold much less interest for us. See our mission statement at the bottom of the .
A: Sure, but when I'm done it won't give up the eggplant without a fight.
A: We no longer answer questions about Robot Wars competitors. There is an earlier post about our opinion of 'Drillzilla' further down in this archive.
To make it easy, add another form below for Asker to fill up their e-mail address (optional) if they want to be notified & got their reply in the mail as well.
Thanks! [email address removed]
A: Mark J. here: a reasonable suggestion, but given that we generally answer submitted questions within 24 hours and that we provide our service without charge, I don't think it's too much to ask that people check the website to find their answer. Adding an additional step to our process is only going to slow down our reply.
We have always offered a 'confidential' email reply option for answers you don't want published on our website -- see #11. If you have special circumstances that require an email response, we will do our best to accommodate you.
A: Maybe you should hope for a few Mad Libs books for the holidays. Drop some hints.
A: I believe that robot combat will recover from its current low ebb, but I don't think it will ever return to the high interest and exposure it had in the early years.
Q: ...and is it true that super chiabot had little minibots? and if yes what was there weight and weapons?
A: Yes, the Robot Action League's middleweight 'Super Chiabot' did release two minibots in combat. You can see them in a YouTube video of Super Chiabot vs. Complete Control. The minibots were essentially wedges -- they had some lifting capability but it wasn't enough to influence a middleweight match. As a guess I'd say they each weighed a couple of pounds.
The Robot Action League made several multibots. You can read about their robots and design philosophy at the Will Wright Fansite.
Q: Oh sorry Aaron I have possibly 1 last question did panzer mk 4 ever used it lifter?
A: Sorry, but we no longer answer questions about UK Robot Wars competitors -- even competitors from American teams.
A: All the old questions are stored in the archives by category -- newest questions at the top. Click on the green buttons near the top of this page to jump to the various archives.
A: See our comments on 'Last Rites' in the archive.
A: Mark J. here: for the record, the quote you reference was in response to a post suggesting that smaller robots be destroyed by larger ones at the end of a tournament to 'spice up' robot combat. I mean no offense to the great majority of the robot combat audience, but I have a low opinion of the small sector of the audience that is entertained only by senseless destruction. We certainly should not cater to them. My quote:
The full post appears in the archive.
A: The last I heard of Team Cool Robots was at Steel Conflict 4 in 2003 - just about the same time their website was last updated. Team leader Christian Carlberg has now founded C2 robotics and still works on an occasional combat robot.
A: There is no chatter on the Fighting Robot Association forum, and I can't imagine why Team Hurtz would rebuild their unsuccessful BattleBots competitor 'Beta'. I think we can call the updated fly-through just a design study.
Both versions of the fly-through are available on their site: the old fly-through and the updated version.
A: Enthusiasm.
A: No - I haven't been browsing the Gametechmods site for a while. A little searching turned up a photo in the Gametechmods forum.
A: You're kidding me, right? You don't need my 'opinion' about the success of 'Wedge of Doom': 43 wins, 5 losses, and 5 tournament victories gives WoD the best record of any lightweight combat robot.
Q: what was the last match of wedge of doom? Is there any photo of the last version of it? What is the purpose of the extension on top of its wedge?
A: You can research the combat record for any robot, match-by-match, at BotRank.com. Look up the name in their Unique Name DataBase and click on it.
'Wedge of Doom' last fought at RoboGames 2005 under the name 'Smashbox'. It had several different wedge configurations available at that event. One of those configurations had wedge-top extensions to prevent an opponent from driving over the top of the robot - keeping it in location for the lifter to be effective.
I can't find any good still photos of the RoboGames 'Smashbox' version, but there are videos. Start with: Hexy Jr. vs. Smashbox - RG05.
A: The current 'Ziggy' has an awesome flipper, but the name is recycled. I wish the team had found an un-used name.
A: See the introductory paragraph - top of the main page.
A: You're welcome. I don't know which question was yours, but I'm happy to have been of some help!
A: Too much weapon, not enough 'bot.
A: 'BioHazard' last fought at the 2005 ComBots Cup event and has not competed since. I don't know BioHazard's current status - you can always ask Carlo.
A: Mark J here: it's an analogy. We substituted 'hamburger' for all the robot components builders write to ask about in order to make our situation more understandable. People might appreciate the difficulty in trying to answer a question about a hamburger when they are given too little information. We hope to get people to provide enough detail with their question for us to have some reasonable chance of providing a decent answer.
Don't feel bad -- I've never met an engineer that could understand an analogy.
A: Mark J. I cannot think of == ANYTHING == that is "universally accepted" in the combat robotics community. If you ask a substantial question in the forums you will get half-a-dozen different answers from as many people.
If you want a cloud of un-vetted answers, ask your question in one of the forums. If you want our answer, ask us.
A: Tom Sweeney's 'Rambot' bears a distinct resemblance to Robotica season 1 winner 'Run Amok'. It certainly isn't a bad idea to emulate designs that have proven their worth! 'Rambot' was entirely capable in all of the Robotica challenges and Tom was the only non-returning competitor to make the finals at season 3. A fine robot, and well driven.
A: I'd think this was a lot funnier if I hadn't received at least one serious version of each of these questions (except the Pleo avenger, that's new). Sometimes the hamburger is very bad. The answers I'd like to give, in order:
A: Thank you! Simplicity is a major design consideration at Team Run Amok. Our motto: 'Complicated design is easy - simple takes work.'
A: See Wikipedia: Robot and #1.
A: BEEP - I am a robot that will answer any question - BEEP - Type your question and I will answer it - BEEP
I get a lot of these questions. It seems there's a rumor about an omniscient robot out on the internet that can answer any question. A lot of the phrases people Google to search for this fictitious robot land them here at 'Ask Aaron'. Excited, they stumble blindly into the first text box they see and start typing. Do they ask for a way to end human suffering? Do they attempt to unravel the philosophical mysteries of the ages? Do they seek the holy grail? No. The popular questions are:
A: I'll make an exception - I miss frenZy as well.
First appearing at the 1997 US Robot Wars, 'FrenZy' was one of only five robots to compete at all of the BattleBots tournaments. FrenZy made an appearance in the UK for their Robot Wars, and earned an 'Honorable Mention' in the Combat Robot Hall of Fame. The final fight was a loss against 'Bull It' at Steel Conflict 3 in 2003. The Team Minus Zero website still lists frenZy's status as 'battle ready'.
A: Mark J here: we could start a big argument here! More important than your minor is the program at the school you choose. Discuss your interests with counselors at several schools before you make a choice. See if you can find a mentor who shares your interests on faculty. As for myself, I have two degrees in the biological sciences with minors in math and chemistry; there's more than one way to skin a robot.
A: What if I do?
Q: Can yu show picle bot?
A: No, you'll have to find your own picklebot.
Q: Do you has burger bot? [Fort Wayne, Indiana]
A: Don't mess with me, Fort Wayne. See photo.
A: Both were built from toy tricycles, but years apart and by completely different teams. 'Andy Roid' was built for the 1994 US Robot Wars by Bob Cooper and Scott McNamara from California, and 'The Toy' was built for BattleBots 5.0 (2002) by team 'Sunami' from Illinois.
Q: Did'nt team tsuanami build another bot? and what happened to the old bot AGSMA?
A: I know of a 'Team Tsumani' from California, a 'Team Tsunami' from Nevada, and a 'Sunami' from Illinois. 'Sunami' built both lightweight 'The Toy' and heavyweight 'Dredge' for BattleBots 5.0. Neither of their robots won a match. I believe the robots jumped off the Golden Gate bridge together.
There is a previous post about the long history of 'AGSMA' in the archive. 'AGSMA' competed as recently as 2009, although the current version has little in common with the original. You can research the combat record for any North American robot at BotRank.com - see #31.
A: See marcthorpe.com.
See also FAQ #32
Q: I mean is there any CURREnt info on mark?
A: I have no more current info than his own website. His email is on the splash page -- you could write and ask him what he had for breakfast if you like.
A: Inertia Labs (website) last competed in 2005, AFAIK.
'Herr Gepounden' still competes -- see its current record at BotRank.com.
A: Yes, I do great robot.
A: If you're having trouble finding a website for a recent competitor, try looking up the team or robot at Builders DB -- there's often a link. For archives of 'classic' robot websites, see #30. In this particular case, I don't know of a website for the 'Late Night Racing' team, builders of 'The Big B' and 'Original Sin'.
Q: IS THERE A WEBSITE TO ZION??
A: I just gave you my tips for finding websites. Follow them, and you can find any website I can.
A: I have video, but there really isn't much to see. There's a 'snap' noise when the trap is triggered and the other robot goes flying. Use the search box to find previous posts about 'Rat Amok'.
A: Mark J here: the only robot I would consider selling would be our heavyweight 'The Gap' and only because it takes up so much space in the workshop. I once offered to sell it to an interested party for the replacement cost of the motors, ESCs, and pneumatics -- batteries and radio not included. I don't recall what that added up to. Convince me you're a serious buyer and I'll look up the prices for you.
A: The standard method of reporting speed for combat robots has always been to simply calculate the theoretical speed based on no-load motor RPM:
This is nothing more than a 'brag number' and has no relationship to actual attainable speed, let alone the speed possible within the confines of a small arena. I have no information on actual speeds for any combat robots -- not even my own.
Lightweight 'The Great Pumpkin' entered the 2009 RoboGames representing Ray Billings' Hardcore Robotics team -- the same team that entered heavyweight 'Last Rites', middleweight 'Mortician', and featherweight 'Mitch'.
I have no photos of either 'Kill-O-Amp>' or 'Center Punch' -- try Team Nightmare's event report gallery
A: We've said many times that we have little interest in robots that fought once, lost, and were never heard of again -- like 'Robot Redford Junior'. If you have some interest, #30 has instructions for researching archives of old team websites and sources for robot fight histories.
A quick check of the BotRank.com Name Database shows eight different 'Scrap Daddy' robots in four weight classes. All were built by Mark Bradford and friends. None had a winning record, and half never won a single match. If you'd like more information you'll have to go dig it up for yourself.
A: 'SJ' (formerly 'Slam Job') is still under the control of Team Blackroot -- no change in ownership.
Q: ...and can I pweese have some info on Thumper?
A: Which 'Thumper'?
A: 'Topbot' was a UK Robot Wars competitor that never won a match. As stated in the box into which you typed your question, we are not currently answering questions about UK Robot Wars competitors -- that goes double for those that never won a match.
Q: ...and what happened to Clephrechon?
A: 'Cleprechaun' lost two out of three matches it fought at RoboGames 2006. Depressed, 'Cleprechaun' made its way to the center of the San Mateo Bridge and leapt off - only to land on the deck of a freighter bound for Alaska. After hitching a ride into Anchorage, 'Cleprechaun' worked as a fish gutter in a cannery for several years and saved every penny until it had enough money to open a small Ski-Doo repair shop. It married a lovely girl named Taliriktug and had four children: a girl, two boys, and a stapler. The family is doing well.
Q: clephrocon faught in 08 two
A: Not according to Cleprechaun's record at BotRank.com or Builders DataBase. Must have been some bar fight in Alaska.
A: Teams rarely give notice, either in person or on their websites, of their reasons for departure from the sport. They just stop showing up at events. Both of the teams you mention were strongly associated with BattleBots. When those competitions ended, it is safe to assume that they just lost interest and moved on. A lot of teams did.
A: Check #30 for information on how to locate and access both current and archived team websites. It's best to get general information straight from the source.
A: Andrew Lindsey was very... 'protective' of the contents of his 'Team Spike' site. I'm told he made specific requests that it not be archived and had it withdrawn from the Wayback Machine. He took the site itself down about a decade ago and I know of no existing copy.
A: Not seriously. I play video games for fun, but I don't want to get competitive.
A: I don't have much. Ken Swenson's middleweight 'Satan's Revenge' fought only at the 1997 U.S. Robot Wars. It lost both of its fights, versus 'Hyena' and eventual champion 'Vicious 1'. There is a short video of the fight against 'Vicious 1' on YouTube.
Q: can I have info on hyena?
A: There is very little information available on most of the robots that competed in the early US Robot Wars. You can find their combat records by looking them up at the BotRank Unique Name Database. We have builder names (and some photo links) at the Combat Robotics Tournament Tree site. With luck, you may find a video at YouTube.
A: See post on 'Test Toaster One' (with photo) farther down in this archive.
A: Yes and no. Carlo is still involved in many areas of robotics, but has not competed in full combat events for quite a few years. He operates Robotbooks.com, produces BattleKits, markets "Roboxers" (photo at right), and makes regular appearances at robot themed events.
Q: Then what about Carlo's involvement in sumo? Is he still active in that?
A: We don't follow sumo. I can tell you that there is no mention of current sumo activity on any of Carlo Bertocchini's web pages and I can not find his name listed in event reports from recent sumo tournaments.
A: No comment.
A: Superheavyweight 'Ziggy' has a well designed 4-bar flipper powered by a big high-pressure pneumatic system. There is a lot of design and fabrication work needed to get such a weapon to be effective and reliable. However, as we are quick to point out, the weapon is perhaps the least important system on a combat robot. All the other systems have to work well or the robot cannot be successful. Ziggy's weapon is well integrated into an efficient and durable chassis/drivetrain and is driven well. Get the basics down pat, then play with a big weapon.
How do you beat 'Ziggy'? In the immortal words of our friends at Team Jawbreaker: "Hit 'em 'til they break." Good luck with that.
A: I could only estimate. Try asking builder Christian Carlberg: christian@coolrobots.com.
A: For general inquiries: info@teamwhyachi.com
A: Physics homework? Weight and mass are different things. A spring scale cannot directly measure mass -- it measures the weight (force) an object exerts on the scale platform. Properly, force is measured in newtons (metric) or pounds (english) and that is what a spring scale measures. On the surface of the Earth a mass of 1 kg exerts a downward force of about 9.8 newtons, so a simple conversion approximation is usually applied by scales.
A: 'La Machine' was a two wheeled robot. See YouTube video.
Q: Then what about the second version of la machine? Is it 2-wheel or 4-wheel drive?
A: The video link above is from 1997 and shows the second (heavyweight) version of 'La Machine'. Both the middleweight and heavyweight versions were two-wheeled.
A: We don't predict fantasy matches not involving our own team. In fantasy matches that do involve our team, we always win.
A: This exact question, word-for-word, has been previously answered: search this archive.
Always happy to hear we were of some help.
A: 'Potter's Wheel' was one of a great many robots that fought once, lost, and were never seen again. In this case it lost its only fight to 'Son of Bob' in the middleweight division at BattleBots 4.0. Its spinning weapon appears too small to be an actual potters wheel. I have no other information. If there was anything interesting or educational about 'Potter's Wheel' you would not have trouble finding it.
Q: are you sure the disk on Potter's wheel, is not actually a mounting disk? 'cause if you get the DSL mod for Robot Arena 2, there is a replica and it is spinning a potters wheel, and you can use the wheel, to :S and do you know what happed to the LW flame thrower bot, Bob?
A: No, I'm not sure. Like I said, it looks small for a pottery disk - but I don't have a good enough picture to tell for sure. Either way, it was not successful.
With 30 wins, 10 losses, and five class championships in the MechWars and WBX series', 'Bob' was a very successful robot! 'Bob' was from a Minnesota-based team and has not competed since the Minnesota MechWars series folded in 2007.
A: 'Thor' had a hydraulic overhead club weapon powered by an on-board internal combustion engine.
A: Voting for the Combat Robot Hall of Fame is open to all members of the combat robot community. The 2011 vote will be announced in prominent combat robot forums in the US and UK sometime in August of that year.
A: I think not - perhaps your memory is in error? We broke 1000 questions in late spring of 2008 and it seems unlikely that we pushed to 2200 by January 2009. You're welcome to go thru the archives and do your own count if you like
A: Browsing our site will uncover a few of those reasons we are not currently competing, but most importantly we just didn't have any fun at the last few competitions we attended. San Francisco is a long way to travel to fight a beetle and not have any fun.
A: Mark J. here: you'll have to go find your own pictures.
A: Yes, both 'W.L.O.W.' and the 'Raptor' series of robots were built by Team Raptor lead by Bob Pitzer. I have no idea what W.L.O.W. stands for.
A: I'm not leaking, confirming, or denying any info on the 2009 BattleBots competitors.
A: Team Whyachi is still active and they maintain a very complete website that will answer your questions about their robots. Additionally, there are multiple posts about 'Son of Whyachi' and other Whyachi robots in our archives.
There were several versions of SoW -- the controversial shufflebot version that won the heavyweight division at BattleBots 3.0 was sold to the Lazy Toad Robot Club to hang on the wall as a decoration.
A: At BattleBots 1.0 'Gray Matter' had only a large spike. I recall an active spinner weapon added for season 5.0.
A: The last record I have of one of their combat robots fighting was 2002.
Q: Would you consider gray matter a sucsesfull bot?
A: With 3 wins and 4 losses, 'Gray Matter's record is not great -- but it did get good air time on the BattleBots broadcasts. I guess it depends on how you measure success.
Q: Was Gyrax a full body drum or a thwackbot?
A: Hard to describe - see for yourself: 'Gyrax' at The Builders Database (click on the small photo).
Q: was Vladiator sold or Vlad The Impaler 2?
A: Both were sold. You can track them at The Builders Database.
Q: Was MK02 the old mauler 2000 with bigger weapons?
A: I have no information on 'MK02'.
A: Previously answered - search for 'Karcas' in the archive.
A: You can use the BotRank Unique Name DataBase to find the complete combat records of the more than 4000 robots who fought in north and south America. There is no listing for 'Marauder Mirah', but there are listings for middleweight 'Miriah' and superheavyweight 'Marauder' - both from BattleBots.
A: I don't think so either.
A: Heavyweight 'Gammatron' and superheavy 'Gammacide' are from the same team, but were very different robots.
A: You start asking inappropriate questions at a robot Q&A site.
Q: What caused Blunt Force Trauma to do bad?
A: Ineffective slow spinner. Fought twice, lost twice - no interest in discussing.
Q: what was malichious mischifs weapon?
A: 'Malicious Mischief' had a spring-loaded sledgehammer/spike. Your version attacked with atrocious spelling.
Q: were ricon and odin the same bots?
A: Same team - I believe 'Odin' was a rebuild on the 'Ricon' chassis.
Q: wy did the builders of serial box killer or the owners of battlebots not get in trouble for him looking like a frostead flakes box?
A: Fair use for artistic purposes. It's not like Kelloggs didn't want the free publicity.
Q: they made a toy of sooooo, what?
A: Care to ask that again?
A: Hey! A little respect is due anyone who built a robot and got out there to compete. That said, I'm implementing a new rule:
Q: Please can you give me a reason why you're not allowing me to talk about one-time losers? Lightening Tracks was.
A: Mark J. here: you can talk about them all you want - just don't expect us to join in. There have been an inordinately large number of questions in recent weeks on two topics:
This isn't a fanboy site. Our main focus is to support builders of combat robots with information, design tools, and opinions based on our competition experience. As a secondary service we are pleased to share our knowledge about what goes on 'behind the scenes' and 'in the pits' at competitions, our views on issues important to the sport, and topics of broad interest we have uncovered while researching the history of robot combat.
Those 'one-time loser' robots have very limited use within our focus. There is usually little or no information available about the builders, construction details of the robot, or why the robot failed. Once in a while the cause of the failure is both obvious and sufficiently unique to be used as an example of why certain construction techniques or design principles should not be used -- but that example would be used in answering a design or construction question rather than in a question targeted at a specific obscure robot.
Regarding 'Lightning Tracks': the robot competed at both Robot Wars and at Robotica (as 'Dark Track'). Builder Russ Barrow built more than half a dozen robots, competed at all three major televised events, maintained a robot webpage, and earned an honorable mention in the Combat Robot Hall of Fame. We'll discuss Russ' robots any day.
A: I have no idea. I'd suggest asking Ed Hoppitt.
A: No information. Suggest you ask Patrick.
Q: You told me to ask Patrick [Campbell] about Frenzy, but how can I do that, especially if your rules are not to answer that sort of thing?
A: Mark J. here: what rule would that be? The information in #30 may help you to contact Patrick.
A: Ed Robinson is a circus performer. His list of talents includes sword swallowing and juggling.
A: Sorry, I don't keep this type of information - I don't think it's of general interest. I do happen to know where 'Diskotec' was from: see next question.
A: Not exactly. The two builders were friends, but 'Propeller-Head' was from Colorado and 'Diskotec' was from Minnesota. 'Run Away' and 'The Gap' were built in the same shop by a single group that split into two competition teams at Robot Wars.
Q: When they met Rosie the Riveter in Nickelodeon Robot Wars, was it true that Tut Tut was facing it's own team-mate?
A: Again, not exactly. The operation of loanerbot 'Tut Tut' in the Nickelodeon Challenge Belt was overseen by Mike Morrow of Team JuggerBot. 'Rosie the Riveter' was fighting under the supervision of Chris Gattman who was formerly a member of Team JuggerBot before leaving to start Team LogosEye.
A: Our team motto is "Complicated design is easy. Simple takes work." The concept is similar to the KISS principle. We've seen a great many robots fail in combat because of complex, crowded, difficult to service designs, so we work to keep our robots simple, open, and serviceable. This has worked well for us.
A: I find it difficult to keep current with UK robot happenings. I read the Roaming Robots newsletter and browse the forums, but there is no site like BotRank.com that follows the UK tournaments and I can't find a source of full tournament trees. I just don't have the time to pull enough information together to get a good understanding of the UK teams.
Given the above, I can't really offer an opinion on how Team Hydra might do with 'Dantomkia'.
A: I don't believe 'Thor' was rebuilt into anything, and I don't know of any robot named 'Dark Night'.
A: Solid construction and a reliable drive train will get you farther than a good weapon. 'Bunny Attack' did very well for a 'novelty' entrant, but none of its wins came against high-level opponents.
A: 'Odin II' picture and info here (slow loading).
A: Static.
A: No - 'Hworf' clearly had four wheels.
A: Mark J. here: I did dislike 'Drillzilla' (AKA 'The Ugly Vibrating Brick'), but not because they beat us. I was convinced - correctly, I think - that their shufflebot design was not good for the sport. The rulemakers agreed.
Their design was not legal for Robot Wars Extreme Warriors 2, but I do not have specific information on why they did not return with another robot.
A: We had very little time to modify 'Run Amok' with an active weapon for Robot Wars. We were a bit concerned about the lack of side armor and decided on the unique 'sidewheeler' blades to add a little defense as well as a bit of offense.
Q: Is it true that Tornado was inspired by the less sucsessful King B?
A: I've never heard any mention of 'King B' inspiring 'Tornado'.
Q: It says on an anti-plaigarism statement on the Tornado website that King B inspired the series 6 champions. You know now, don't you?
A: No points for wasting time with a question to which you already knew the answer. This isn't 'Quiz the Robot Geek'.
A: There was no 'Robot Wars studio'. The first series of Robot Wars Extreme Warriors was filmed on-site at a technology fair in the huge Earls Court Exhibition Centre. The second series was filmed at Shepperton Studios. We were very busy in the pits tending to our robots and did not get to see many matches. There was also very limited access to the arena seating for roboteers. I remember enjoying the final of the Second World Championships.
A: Yes. Horizontal spinner 'Spin Doctor' and full body spinner 'The Revolutionist' were both from Team Logicom. Both were in the main tournament at RWEW2 --
Q: Spin Doctor lost in round 2, actually, after driving into the pit against Panzer mk. [4]. Cyclone immobilized itself in round 1. Did you Know that?
A: Yes, you're correct. There were many horizontal disk spinners at RWEW2 and I had 'Spin Doctor' confused with the similar 'Diskotec' that did lose in round 1.
A: Mark J. here: Steve died after a long battle with respiratory disease. The robot community will sorely miss him.
A: I don't think I have a single favorite. Too many good ones.
A: I heard something about them jumping off a bridge together and ending up in Borneo, but that's just a rumor. I'd suggest asking around at the FRA forum.
A: Mark J. here: Aaron reports that he had a great time all the time at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors, so I'll give you the stories of my own best and worst times -- and I'll throw in a thank-you to one of the other teams.
When we arrived at RWEW2, 'Run Away' was 'seeded' and assigned a spot in Heat G of the main tournament, but 'The Gap' was not given pit space in the main arena and was scheduled only to compete in some un-named secondary event. I flagged down Dan Danknick and asked what was up. He told us that the producers didn't want two robots from a single team in the main tournament. I asked if the producers had actually seen 'The Gap'? I was certain they would want it in as it was a beautiful machine. Dan went off to inquire, and 30 minutes later 'The Gap' was assigned a spot in Heat D, where it went on to score the quickest knockout in the tournament. I was very pleased to have two robots fighting in the main robot wars tournament, and to have both of them progress past their first matches.
My worst moment came when I got a good look at the damage done to 'Run Away' by 'Destructive Criticism' in the opening round of Heat G. Randy Eubanks had only finished piecing his robot together a few hours before the match. The robot had a very fierce horizontal blade powered by one of the then brand new Etec mega motors. When 'Run Away' became stuck on top of the incapacitated 'Dark Tracks', Randy saw an opportunity to test out his new weapon on the rear axle of my 'bot. He destroyed my tire and wheel, and the shock loading shattered the differential assembly and the bearing supports. We were thru to the next round, but it didn't look good for 'Run Away' to ever run again.
I dragged the assorted pieces of 'Run Away' back to the pits and called over team-mate Max Chapin from his driving duties with 'The Gap'. Max Chapin is the best metal worker I've ever known, and he just smiled and said "no problem". We scavenged scrap bits from the rubbish bins in the pits and came up with enough metal to weld-up a solid rear axle and mount the main drive sprocket more-or-less straight. I had a spare rear tire but no spare rear wheel, so I set to work trying to hammer the jagged remains of the original back into something that looked round. Hours later, Max Chapin's fingers ware burned and mine were bloody. He left to drive 'The Gap' against 'Propeller-Head' and I went to work assembling the bodged pieces. We made the call for our next match against our friends and 'General Chompsalot'. We lost, but the important thing is that we fought.
'General Chompsalot' grabbed onto 'Run Away' at the end of the match and fought to keep the House Bots from taking her off to destruction. Their kindness let me keep my promise to Aaron that he could drive in the Nickelodeon Robot Wars event. Thanks Tim and Dave!
A: Ask them.
A: Mark J. here: our opening round match had 'Run Away' facing 'Destructive Criticism' (built by BattleBots veteran Randy Eubanks) and 'Lightning Tracks' (Russ Barrow's re-named 'Dark Track' from Robotica 3). A description of both this match and our next round match against 'General Chompsalot' is in this archive - search for 'Lightning'. I don't recall the House Robots in each match.
A: Blue's armament was a horizontal spinning disk. Blue's armor appeared to be expanded polyurethane foam applied over some very thin and poorly mounted base material. According to team member Karl Jones:
A: The lifter gearmotor used in 'Zpatula' is a heavilly modified lifter assembly from the 'BioHazard' Pro-series R/C toy. The slip clutch was locked out, the RS-130 motor was replaced with an RS-180 (bought on eBay), and limit switches were installed to cut off the lifter controller at maximum and minimum lift levels.
A: I don't recall. It may have been in the Robot Rebellion event at RWEW2.
Q: Was 'Zanzara' (driven by your team in Nickelodeon RW), origionally 'Silver Box'?
A: I suspect it was, with some fur added. I didn't get a good look at 'Silver Box' at RWEW1.
Q: Was 'Zanzara's blade similar to the one on 'Pussycat'?
A: No. Zanzara's blade was just a piece of sheet metal with a slit cut into it. It was not capable of doing any damage. The 'loanerbots' were not intended to be competitive.
Q: How were 'Mad cow' and 'Mad cow bot' related?
A: See the 'Mad Cow' post below in this archive.
A: I tell people to 'ask the builder' if they want to know what happened to a robot. Somebody has been listening! 'Zpatula' is sitting on the end of our workbench, a few paces away from 'Run Amok' and 'The Gap'.
A: Vlad was 'entropically retired' by 'Mechavore' at BattleBots 3.0 -- effectively cut in half. Vlad was not rebuilt [until much later].
Q: I thought he was turned into 'Vlad the Impaler 2' or was Vlad 2 a complete rebeld?
A: Vlad 2 was a new robot from the ground up.
A: The superheavyweight robot fought two matches at BattleBots and lost them both. Depressed, 'G.O.R.T.' made its way to the center of the Golden Gate Bridge and leapt off - only to land on the deck of a freighter bound for Costa Rica. After hitching a ride into San José, 'G.O.R.T' worked as a bouncer in a tavern for several years and saved every penny until it had enough money to open a small juice bar. It married a lovely girl named Linda and had four children: a girl, two boys, and a blender. The family is doing well.
A: 'Son of Whyachi' has evolved thru several different rotor power configurations. The most recent version used two 15 hp Yamaha gasoline kart engines. The previous version used three Eteks. The BattleBots champion 'shufflebot' version used two Eteks.
A: Sorry, you'll have to find your own videos.
A: Do you have PayPal? I could buy a copy and send it to you. I don't know how much shipping would be, but I'd ship for my cost.
A: You can find the combat history of US robots at the BotRank.com Name Database. Search for the robot by name, then click on 'history'.
A: You know, if people are interested in robots at all they are interested in robots that had some success instead of robots that fought once, lost, and disappeared. Knowing what happened to 'Stewbot' is not going to be a great conversation starter at parties -- not even at robot parties. If there was anything important about these robots or if the team went on to do anything interesting you would not be having trouble finding that information.
A: The featherweight robot won it's first fight at the 1996 Robot Wars against 'Rampage', but lost its second fight to 'Spike'. Depressed, 'Yo Mama' made its way to the center of the Oakland Bay Bridge and leapt off - only to land on the deck of a freighter bound for Hong Kong. After hitching a ride into the city, 'Yo Mama' worked in a meat locker for several years and saved every penny until it had enough money to open a small cell phone repair shop. It married a lovely girl named Suen and had four children: a girl, a boy, and two flip phones. The family is doing well.
A: I don't think 'Professor Chaos' has ever been inverted in combat. It doesn't have a dedicated SRiMech, so it would have to rely on the weapon to kick it back upright. Other vertical spinners can do that, but not with 100% reliability. I'd give it a risky 'maybe'.
A: Yes, that's most likely lightweight 'Rocket'.
A: Pat Boon competed at Robot Wars 1996 with middleweight 'The General', sponsored by the University of California at Santa Barbara.
The robot lost its first and only fight, to 'Traxx'. Depressed, 'The General' made its way to the center of the Golden Gate Bridge and leapt off - only to land on the deck of a freighter bound for the Philippines. After hitching a ride into Manila, 'The General' worked in a laundry for several years and saved every penny until it had enough money to open a small appliance repair shop. It married a lovely girl named Rosalinda and had four children: two girls, a boy, and a microwave. The family is doing well.
Pat Boon never, to the best of my knowledge, built another robot. 'The General' had a design that looked like Robert Masek's lightweight 'Scrap Metal' at BattleBots 2.0, but I can find no other relationship between the two.
A: Not much call for heavyweights here in the Pacific Northwest. It last fought at a parking lot match in 2004.
A: Pretty, but couldn't fight. Lost its only match to the weak 'Sir Chromalot' and 'The Alien' in the opening round of The Sixth Wars. Wish I knew what G.B.H. stood for, but it was never disclosed.
Q: What did you think of 'Texas Tornado'? What is your opinion on 'Spiny Norman' and 'Yo Mama'?
A: 'G.B.H. 2' was unusual enough to be interesting, but we don't give opinions on every mundane robot.
Q: Do you know of any sites where I can search the builders names to get info? Is there a site where I can search any robot and get information on it besides its records?
A: Mark J. here: no such luck. It takes considerable detective work to trace combat robot history. I spent six months running down the information needed to put together the tournament trees and early rule sets for our Who Won web page.
You can start with the Event Reports by Team Nightmare and the Links Page at RobotCombat.com. You'll get very familiar with The Wayback Machine to locate older versions of websites. You may also get some useful information from the Builders Database.
If you're really this interested in stories from early robot combat, drop whatever you're doing and go find a copy of 'Gearheads: the turbulent rise of robotic sports' by Brad Stone. You'll thank me.
As previously mentioned, BotRank has combat records for more than 4000 robots. A great many of these robots simply have no story. They were built, they fought, they won or lost, and their builders moved on. Even if you find the builder, they may have no specific memories of their career in robot combat.
A: 'La Machine' was a team effort from Gage Caushois, Greg Munson, and Trey Roski. Caushois was the 'gearhead' and proposed the design, Munson organized the team and arranged funding, and helicopter pilot Roski did the driving. You can read the whole story in 'Gearheads: the turbulent rise of robotic sports' by Brad Stone.
A: Chris Harriman went on to build many, many robots and to compete pretty much everywhere -- including Robot Wars, but not with the old 'Nemesis'. The 1996 'Nemesis' was never heard from again. The middleweight 'Nemesis' that competed at BattleBots was not related.
It's standard practice to scavenge retired robots for parts that live on in new robots. BotRank has tracked the competition records for more than 4000 combat robots, almost all of them now retired. If you really want to find out precisely what happened to any specific one of them you're going to have to track down the builder and ask.
Q: Ok, thanks. What robots did he build?
A: Following the US Robot Wars, Chris Harriman became associated with Team Raptor. He built and fought the thwackbot 'Carnage' at Botbash and BattleBots, and the fierce vertical spinner 'Cyclone' at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors. He also contributed to the construction of the 'Raptor' line of robots: 'Alpha Raptor', 'Beta Raptor', 'Tripulta Raptor', 'Gamma Raptor', 'Rippa Raptor' and 'Pack Raptors'.
Q: HE DID!!! NO WAY!! ok, one more bot, did the builder(s) of pokey from the 1996 robot wars build anything else? what happened to pokey?
A: That would be Curt Meyers from Team Boilerbots - builder of 'Pokey', 'Kill-O-Amp', and 'Jaws of Death'. As mentioned previously, if you want to know what happened to a specific robot - ASK THE BUILDER.
Q: sorry, I just can not find any of the builders for some reason. Also, one more bot then I promise I'm done, what happened to los gringos locos from 1995 and did the team build anything else? I'm done now :)
A: The Los Gringos Locos team competed at Robot Wars 1995 with a lightweight robot officially named 'Pain Mower'. The robot is better known as 'Los Gringos Locos' because the team name was lettered prominently on top.
The robot lost its first and only fight, to 'Kitty Puff Puff'. Depressed, 'Pain Mower' made its way to the center of the Golden Gate Bridge and leapt off - only to land on the deck of a freighter bound for the Philippines. After hitching a ride into Manila, 'Pain Mower' worked in a laundry for several years and saved every penny until it had enough money to open a small auto parts store. It married a lovely girl named Maria and had four children: two boys, a girl, and a toaster. The family is doing well.
Tommy Van Gelder and the rest of Los Gringos Locos never, to the best of my knowledge, built another robot.
A: Willis Wong's 'The Landshark' fought a single fight at the 1997 US Robot Wars. It lost to 'Z'. Willis had previously entered heavyweight 'Marvin' in the 1996 Robot Wars. It lost its first and only fight to 'The Merrimac'. My files have no other information on Willis or his robots.
You might be interested in Team Run Amok's Who Won page. It has complete tournament trees for the major robot combat tournaments.
A: There have been multiple unrelated robots named 'Mad Cow'. There was a lightweight spinner from Team Mad Cow (archived) that fought at BattleBots, a middleweight from Team Rabid Robotics that fought in the MechWars series, and a heavyweight from Team Boltz that fought at RWEW1. Team Boltz returned to RWEW2 with a minor upgrade 'Mad Cow Bot' and the new 'Psycho Chicken'.
A: Mark J. here: no.
'Hercules 2' was built by Jim Smentowski in 1997/1998 and was never put into competition. Jim sold the unused Hercules 2 in February, 2001 to an undisclosed buyer.
'Kill-O-Amp' from Team Boilerbots (Curt Meyers and Amy Sun) first fought at Robot Wars 1997. The name changed to 'Kill-O-Amp 2' for BattleBots Long Beach 1999 and BattleBots Las Vegas 1999, but it was essentially the same robot. The name changed back to 'Kill-O-Amp' for BattleBots 1.0 (June 2000). A pointed front prow was added for BattleBots 2.0 (November 2000) which created a vague resemblance to the pointed front of 'Hercules 2'. 'Kill-O-Amp' fought once more at BattleBots 3.0 (May 2001) but this was the same old robot - no relation to 'Hercules 2'.
I don't know who bought 'Hercules 2' from Jim, but it wasn't Team Boilerbots.
A: I'm not sure how you figure 'Monster' did well at the 1997 U.S. Robot Wars. He had two fights and lost them both. Overall record: 2 wins, 5 losses.
I'm not going to take more 'what happened to' questions because the answer is almost always the same: they built, they fought, they got tired of it, and they quit.
A: Lots of robots disappeared following the end of Robot Wars. 'Panic Attack' had been on a long downhill slide:
A: I have very little information on the Robot Wars featherweight competitors. Nothing related to 'Bernard' pops up in my files.
A: If there is a relationship, I can't find it.
A: Sorry, no. I also don't know Philippa Forrester's phone number, Craig Charles' shoe size, or how many bolts held the Robot Wars arena together.
Q: Do you know of a picture of British featherweight 'Eddie Evolution'?
A: 'Eddie Evolution' fought only once, in Robot Wars Extreme Series 2: Robot Rampage. It drove into The Pit and was never seen again. No photo available.
Q: Was 'Eddie Evolution' related to 'A-Kill'/'Saw Point 2'?
A: They looked a bit alike, but I don't know of any relation.
A: It's difficult to comment on a robot that only fought two matches and lost them both. Both 'Original Sin' and 'Original Sin 2' fought at RoboGames '07 - perhaps the team resources were stretched too thin to properly support both robots?
A: Ask them.
A: No, not true. Featherweight 'Pain in the Asp' is the product of Team Torque in the UK. I'm assuming that they are admirers of Team Plumb Crazy and 'Sewer Snake', so they built a featherweight version.
A: Yes, Team Attitude and Thomas Petruccelli fought with lightweight 'Crusher' at BB 2.0 and BB 4.0.
Q: And, whats your opinion on bad attidude? I thought that he was pretty cool.
A: Nice robot. Well designed, well built, and well driven.
Q: Since Bad Attitude is now "Nasty Attitude" would that raise the value of a "Bad Attitude" toy?
A: No.
A: No, but I know how this rumor started. Run Amok used the main chassis elements from an old riding lawnmower that we salvaged from a junkyard. Some photos on the Run Amok Origins web page show the lawn mower with the original mowing blade still in place. The blade assembly was removed in stripping down the chassis, but the photo seems to have caused some confusion.
A: See Frequently Asked Questions #30. I don't believe James Underwood ever had a website for 'Defiant'.
A: Yes - 'The Gap' could (and still can) self-right.
A: I recommend Mitchum Power Gel, Unscented.
A: If hobbyweights were the biggest class supported by our local arena we'd fight hobbyweights, but we like bigger 'bots.
A: Nope - still my favorite. It had all the traits I admire: simplicity, careful materials selection, fine workmanship, and great driving.
A: Sure. My favorite is Robot Arena 2: Design and Destroy, but I've pretty much played them all - PC, Playstation, GameBoy. See previous posts on games in this archive.
A: Team Firestorm had an awesome website, but it's no longer available. See Frequently Asked Questions #30 for tips on finding websites for old combat robot teams.
A: The imaginary kind.
A: Same robot, different paint, new name.
A: In my book a loss is a loss -- knockout or judged, either one sends you home. Given that, I don't recall any of Vlad's six losses being by knockout. Even his final destructive loss to '[Name Deleted]' went to the judges.
A: Every builder and fan has their list of robots they think should be in the Hall who aren't there. I can only say that the voters haven't shown much respect for lightweights since the BattleBots days.
A: It's more complicated than that. Robot names often carry over to entirely new robots, and old robots are sometimes re-named.
George Roach built a lightweight called 'Patriot' that competed at BattleBots 3.0 and posted a 1-1 record. George decided to build a new lightweight rather than modify. He sold the original 'Patriot' on EBay and built an entirely new 'Patriot' that did well, recording a 4-1 record at BattleBots 5.0.
The original 'Patriot' was upgraded with new electronics, new armor, a rear-mounted spike, a new fixed wedge, and a new name: 'Slap Em Silly'. It did well at BattleBots 4.0, making it to the quarter-finals. An entirely new 'Slap Em' Silly' was built for BattleBots 5.0, and the last traces of the original 'Patriot' went into a middleweight multi-bot called 'Slap Em' Sillier'.
Following BattleBots, the 'Slap Em' Silly' name was retired and replaced with 'West Side Glory'. Several generations of lightweight have competed under that name.
A: Team Evil Squirrel's Dylan Feral-McWhirter is a member of Western Allied Robotics and has competed in our Antbotica tournaments. I was going to suggest that you leave a message for Dylan on the Western Allied Robotics forum, but I see that you've already done that and that Dylan has responded. I guess you don't need my help on this one.
A: Superheavyweight 'Ziggy' has seventeen wins and eight losses, pwned by 'Shovelhead' for three of those losses. I have no specific details on the losses.
A: I've asked around and nobody will admit to being your BF. Maybe you should build a robot friend?
A: BioHazard's record is 35 wins and 5 losses - the best win percentage for any heavyweight with more than 7 fights. You can track the record for any North American robot at BotRank.com.
A: A very kind comment - thank you. I'm choosing to not share personal information on the web at this time.
A: In the intelligence line, I'd say 'nobody'.
A: Yes, Team Killerbotics was at RoboGames 2009 with 'Pyromancer'.
A: I don't understand your question.
A: Mark J. here: I think we've discussed 'MechaVore' sufficiently. Ask Aaron is now a 'MechaVore-Free' zone.
A: 'Defiant' was the class of the lightweight field during the period in which it competed. It was the only truely successful 'BioHazard' clone, and the decision to go to a pneumatic lifter was a good one. James Underwood moved on to other interests and left robot combat. I don't believe that 'Ziggo' had anything to do with his decision.
A: No. At the time we built Run Amok we had never seen a single episode of Robot Wars. Our inspiration came from the 1/10th and 1/12th scale R/C road racers we had been driving for a few years before we started in on 'bots. We knew how to drive those and wanted a robot with similar driving characteristics to make an easy transition.
A: 'Killer B' was a fast and powerful competitor. Their twin pancake motors delivered about five times the horsepower of 'Run Amok' at Robotica and we were quite concerned about the fight. However, Killer B was not designed as a pushing robot for a Sumo-style event: their front wedge was had a very shallow angle and the small arena platform would not let them build much speed. We were worried that they would turn their 'bot around and use their blunt tail and brute force to push us straight off the platform, but they apparently didn't think of that option.
A: I like the question! Let's open it up to a vote. Send your ballot in to 'Ask Aaron' for up to five of the 'prettiest' combat robots you've seen. I'll count them up and give my own choices.
RESULTS: Seems like nobody can agree on this. I got half a dozen responses, and the only robot that appeared on more than one ballot was 'Razer' with two votes. 'Razer' wasn't on my list, but given the total lack of agreement I think I'll just leave this question unanswered.
A: Nice guy. I talked with him a bit about his father's music. He isn't at all 'loud' in person.
A: Like the Baseball Hall of Fame, the exact balloting is kept confidential. If a robot appears on at least 50% of the ballots in a given year, it is granted admission to the Hall. A robot appearing on at least 25% of the ballots gets an honorable mention. No quibbling about who got an extra percent or two over whom, or who 'barely made it'.
I will point out that some few robots have a tag under their photo. These robots appeared on every ballot submitted when the Hall opened in 2003. 'Razer' has one of these rare tags.
A: Mark J. here: Team Maggot is based here in the Pacific Northwest. Gary Warren attended a couple of local Oregon events and I had a chance to see his 'bots up close. Gary does a great job of packing components into a tight space, so his 'bots are small for their weight. Smaller size means you can use thicker armor!
Gary learned a lot from 'Maggot' and put all that learning into his next generation robot. 'Botfly' had a tremendous 19 win 9 loss record and was never in a tournament where it lost more matches than it won. Very few 'bots can make that claim.
A: Sorry for the confusion. I thought all the questions were from a single Chinese source. I've checked and all of a sudden the site is getting hits from Anhui, Guangxi, Jilin, and Beijing. Eight years and never a single question from China, now I'm flooded! Why the sudden interest?
Q: I'm the fan of Behemoth from Beijing. One of our little forum's members discovered your FAQ and then we wanna send some questions that've been in our mind for a long time. That's the cause!
A: I'm never gonna be able to go back and straighten this out. If it's OK with you, I'll just label all the recent Chinese questions as 'China Forum'.
A: Team Whoopass lists ten robots in their stable. I believe that all of them can either self-right (with at least some reliability) or run inverted.
A: Carlo is still involved with robotbooks.com and
A: Coolest flipper? Can't beat 'Chaos 2'.
A: I got to meet Stephen Felk at the RFL national championships a few years ago. He is very dedicated to the sport and really seems to enjoy himself at tournaments. He gave us a good tip on a nearby restaurant. He is a fine builder and driver who accomplishes a lot with limited workspace and budget.
A: Behemoth was a very solid competitor with great resilience and staying power. It's design has been compared to the House Robot 'Shunt' -- see a recent post in the archive.
I think it would be an overstatement to say it was one of the greatest amongst so many great UK robots, but it did have great fan support.
A: All of the Panzer series were world-class combat robots -- rugged, powerful, and well driven. We fought against 'Panzer Mk. III' in the first round melee at the first Robot Wars Extreme Warriors. I'm very glad we didn't have to face 'Panzer Mk. I' at Robotica.
A: It certainly borrowed from Chaos 2's design. The full-pressure CO2 flipper gives it greater power, but Chaos 2's success is unlikely to be equaled.
A: Mark J. here: I don't get to decide who is admitted to the Combat Robot Hall of Fame, but I do run the site and organize the balloting. 'M.O.E.' has received a few votes over the years, but never enough to make the Hall. The robot community is asked to consider new members based on four criteria:
Just being a good example of a specific design does not count for much. MOE's record of 5 wins and 3 losses is good, but certainly not dominating -- it lost in the first round of both BattleBots 3.0 and 5.0. MOE never won a title and just does not have a huge fan base.
This reminds me: the Combat Robot Hall of Fame opens balloting for new members in August of odd-numbered years. That's approaching quickly. I'll place notices and ballot instructions on the FRA and RFL forums, so watch there if you'd like to vote for your favorite robots.
A: Your English is much better than my Chinese
Mortis was perhaps the most successful 'multi-weapon' robot in Robot Wars. The combination of a lifting arm and an overhead axe gave it a versitile attack that was very popular with the audience. Mortis has an 'Honorable Mention' on the Combat Robot Hall of Fame.
Overhead axe weapons were useful in the early days of The Wars, but better armor has outdated them. You can only get so much power out of an overhead weapon without flipping your own robot over!
A: As mentioned on the Zpatula web page, our beetle runs a 700 mAH NiMH pack. We made the pack from six AAA cells bought off the rack at a local electronics store -- nothing fancy.
A: Derek Young built some of the most innovative combat robots to ever compete. Derek did not have a large budget and did a tremendous job with the resources he had available. His middleweight 'Complete Control' is a well-deserved member of the Combat Robot Hall of Fame.
A: I never met Team Vladmeisters. They kept kind of a low profile and never even put up a website. Their robots were always well thought out, flawlessly constructed, and professionally prepared. You pretty much had to tear one of their robots in half to stop it.
A: Team Razer built these two robots for very different purposes; it's kinda like asking "which is better, a boat or an airplane?"
Razer was refined over a period of years for combat in the Robot Wars arena where robots can win by tossing an opponent over the railing, shoving them into 'The Pit', or by immobilizing them. Robot Wars was about tactics and strategy.
Warhead was built for BattleBots where there is no Pit and no possibility of throwing an opponent out of the competition area. BattleBots was about destruction.
Head-to-head I'm certain that Warhead would tear Razor apart, but that's not the whole story. In a Robot Wars tournament, I think Razor would advance farther against the mixed designs that enter such tournaments. At a BattleBots tournament my money would be on Warhead to push further into the final rounds because it has fewer weaknesses that could be exploited by the usual entries at those events.
Q: Could you tell me which is better between 'Nasty Attitude' and 'Max Wedge' in your opinion?
A: As pointed out above, it's very difficult to determine the 'better' of two robots. Nasty Attitude has a narrow lead in head-to-head matches against Max Wedge, but Max Wedge has a better overall win/loss record and has won more championships.
I was willing to discuss the heavyweights from Team Razor because they were an interesting contrast in styles, but I'm not going to go thru random pairs of robots and render opinions.
A: Sorry, I didn't have a tape measure in my hand the last time I was standing next to Sewer Snake. From memory, it's about 48" long, 30" wide and maybe 8" tall. If you need to know exactly, contact info for Team Plumb Crazy is on their web site.
A: David Gribble, driver for Robot Wars' Team Pussycat, died in a motorcycle crash in October of 2002 shortly after the filming of the Fifth Wars. Recognized as one of the best drivers in the series, David was 17 years old.
A: I don't really have any time off. I'm jumping into college classes in just a couple of weeks. The problem hasn't been my time, it's been the lack of events here in the Pacific Northwest. Western Allied Robotics have been doing a good job with small 'bots in the Seattle area, but I'm just not that into sublights right now. I like big 'bots!
A: None of them left an impression on me.
A: Combat robots are judged by their ability to win matches. Robots who never won are either unlucky or lacking. Either way, I find it difficult to rank them.
At any rate, 'Bender' does not qualify. Bender's record is 2 wins, 6 losses, with first round wins at BattleBots 4.0 against 'Space Ape' and BattleBots 5.0 against a no-show 'Beta'.
A: I like to listen to it with my fingers in my ears -- not my kind of music. You can listen to it in this You Tube clip. Best I can tell, Plunderbird never had a website.
A: Hey, a shout-out to the Saxons! Mr. Morales teaches CAD and Robotics so he's the obvious faculty choice for a combat robot team. From the students, I'd pick linebacker and wide receiver Thomas 'Pit Bull' Roberts for his great skill at intimidation.
A: Mythbusters is great! Any show with hosts who built combat robots is good for me.
A: Sorry, the order of the individual questions gets scrambled when the 'Recent Questions' are broken up into the categories for the archives. I can't really backtrack to a specific question number...
...but the Internet Archive has a copy of the 'Ask Aaron' page from back when it was only seven questions and a haiku.
A: Well, your computer won't go berserk, tear a big hole in the garage door, and put a gash in your leg that requires 23 stitches.
Robots are designed to interact with the physical world guided by input from their sensors, whereas computers are designed to process information. Robots often contain computers that govern their actions and assist in interpreting the input from their sensors.
A: Since you asked nicely, yes. I think that 'Run Away' realistically could have shredded 'Napalm'.
A: The Ask Aaron site takes very little of my time. I plan to continue answering combat robot questions, but I might take a little longer to get back to you with an answer.
A: I've posted about my interests and activities previously in this archive, but here's an update for May, 2009. I'm a high school senior, have four letters (2 football, 2 basketball) and I'm currently on the track team. I was elected 'King of Hearts' at this year's Valentine's Day dance, and I still play an occasional Yu-Gi-Oh game.
A: 'Lighning Tracks' was a tank-treaded robot that had a cosmetic tank turret attached to the top. 'Run Away' kept Lightning tracks between it and the high-power horizontal spinner blade on 'Destructive Criticism'. After several good hits, LT went dead and RA tried to run up their wedge to shear off the turret but got stuck directly on top. DC powered their weapon and destroyed RA's entire rear axle assembly. We moved on to the next round but we were in real trouble.
Long hours later, we had pieced together a new rear axle from scrap found in the pit trash cans and had hammered the shredded wheel more-or-less round. The differential assembly was not salvageable, so we had a solid rear axle that made for very poor maneuverability.
In the second round match against 'General Chompsalot' we were able to make a single run at them with weapon spinning. The impact did some small damage to them, but our scrap axle flexed and we lost our chain drive. We were dead, and the General fought the Housebots for the carcass.
A: I'm assuming you mean the heavyweight Crockbot at Robot Wars and not the lightweight Crockbot from Team Gator? They were in the pit next to us at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors 1, but I don't recall the names of the team members.
A: I'm not in the UK. Team Run Amok home base is on a hill overlooking the beautiful Willamette Valley.
A: and mudkips liek me.
A: The teams at Robotica were given blue jumpsuits to wear with a colored stripe to identify the team. In the finals, Team Run Amok's color was purple.
A: Mark J. here: it's probably best described as a traffic accident. He got out of his car at a traffic light very late one night to argue with some guys in another car. The driver of a third car didn't see him and hit him. Let's all be careful out there.
A: Some.
A: Mark J. here: I don't get to pick who is or is not in the Hall of Fame -- I just collect the votes. Every two years, voting is opened for the Hall. Announcements are made on the Delphi robot combat forums and on the Fighting Robot Association forum. I tally the votes and announce the results. The Hall first opened for voting in 2003, and I do not recall ever receiving a vote for either 'Little Drummer Boy' or 'Suicidal Tendencies'.
A: 'Panic Attack' is a member of the Combat Robot Hall of Fame and we have a picture there. A Google image search for 'Panic Attack Robot' turned up plenty more photos.
I haven't heard anything about Panic Attack since the Seventh Wars. Kim Davies (captain of Team Panic Attack thru series 6) hangs out at the Fighting Robot Association forum so I suspect any recent developments about Panic Attack are discussed there.
A: Simply retired, I believe.
A: I don't predict fantasy matches, but it would have been fun to watch.
A: More than 'Dolittle' but not as much as 'DoAll'. The main weapon was a pneumatic spike, but it could also spin. You have to remember that robot combat was still new in 1995 and nobody knew what was going to work.
A: We are not involved in posting copyrighted material on the internet and we have no knowledge of the actions of those who are.
A: Chaos 2.
A: I remember being 8 years old and playing with Legos and a box on my bedroom floor. Why anyone would want to watch videos of someone doing this puzzles me.
A: We liked all the fights we won -- hated all the fights we lost. The final platform match at Robotica had to be the best.
A: Like most complex things, robots were not 'invented' -- they delveloped over a long period of time with the help of many smaller inventions. You can't give credit (or blame) to any single person. You can read a short summary of the history of robots.
A: Sorry, I never heard the term used in robotics.
A: Our biggest mistake was probably not quitting while we were ahead. We had a tidy profit after Robotica and Robot Wars, but that's long gone now.
Q: I ment did you ever do anything dumb like what I did by drilling into my receiver. That kind of thing.
A: Well, I'm not going to admit doing anything really dumb, but my dad put a good dent in the side of his truck while he was testing out Robot Wars heavyweight 'Run Away'. He backed into his truck and the rear corner of the armor dug in just under the passenger door. The dent is still there.
A: I don't have any photos of the Robot Wars vertical spinner, but how about a video?
Q: '259' is very cool looking! Does it have a website? Thanks!
A: Check the #30 post on how to locate websites for older teams. I'll save you the trouble this time: I can't find any current or archived website for '259'.
A: Evan White's 'Shuriken' was destroyed at the US Championships at the first Robot Wars Extreme Warriors. I don't recall who did the damage. Evan White returned to RWEW2 with 'Ninjitsu'.
A: We don't generally make predictions on 'fantasy matches' here, but I'll make an exception this time. No matter what BattleBots arena hazard operator 'Pulverizer Pete' did, 'Nightmare' was no match for SOW.
A: Most attempts at funny robot names don't do much for me, but my favorites are:
A: We count questions, not posts. If a post asks two distinct questions we count them both.
A: We may be a little biased about our role in that fight. Let's just say it was a combined effort. I can say that after 'Run Away' sheared the turret off 'Lightning Tracks' we were stuck on top of them and 'Destructive Criticism' tore us a new one.
'Lightning Tracks' was a modified version of Russ Barrow's Robotica 3 robot 'Dark Track', pictured at right. For RWEW he added a tank turret to the top.
A: System requirements say: Windows 98/Me/2000/XP with a 450 MHz Pentium II or higher. No Mac.
A: That's great! I really enjoy hearing from people who dig in and make a robot out of the pieces they have available. You'll learn a lot and have good fun while you're at it.
My dad keeps a updated mention of my age up above my picture at the top of the page. I'm 17 now and a senior at my high school. This year I'm the student manager of the football team and I'll be playing basketball. I play Yu-Gi-Oh twice a week at the local card shop.
A: Thanks for the props! It's hard to list favorites from Robotica since it took all the different 'bots and personalities to make the competitions as amazing as they were. I have listed a group of particular favorites from Season 1 further down in this archive -- search for 'I really liked'.
For season 2, I thought 'Ill Tempered Mutt' and 'Flexi Flier' both paid careful attention to the Robotica challenges and designed well for them. 'Wizard of Saws' gets my vote for coolest looking, and "Mechacidal Maniac" was probably the most fun to watch.
Season 3 was filled with many of our friends from Season 1 and I can't pick favorites from among them. Of the new teams, I liked the ingenuity of 'Scrap 8.2' and the design of 'Rambot' who borrowed many design features from our 'Run Amok'.
A: Chaos 2.
A: Yes, CM Robotics from Ottawa, Ontario built and operate superheavyweight 'Ziggy', heavyweight 'CycloneBot', middleweight 'VanillaBot', and lightweight 'Texas Heat'.
A: Mark J. here: sorry, my danish isn't very good. Try again in English?
A: My favorite robot is the last robot I beat. My least favorite robot is the last robot that beat me.
A: Sorry, no.
A: Not that I recall.
A: The last I saw of them was at BattleBots 3.0 in May, 2001 where the seeded heavyweight 'Punjar' lost it's opening match to 'Shark Byte'.
A: Marc Thorpe was responsible for popularizing robot combat when he came up with the concept for Robot Wars, but credit for the first organized robot combat tournament goes to the Denver Area Mad Scientists Club. They organized the Critter Crunch as part of the MileHiCon Science Fiction convention in Colorado. The exact date of the first Critter Crunch is in question, but it pre-dated the first Robot Wars event (1994) by at least ten years. The 2008 Critter Crunch will be part of the 66th World Science Fiction Convention in Denver.
A: For an active weapon I like lifters and flippers, but they don't do terribly well under the current judging guidelines that focus on damage and aggression rather than controlling the match.
A: No -- why would you believe that? Kyle Rader's 'Evil Beaver' was a low-budget old-school design using as many 'found parts' as possible. The body of the robot was a recycled steel computer case.
A: As she appeared at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors, Chris Gattman's Rosie was invertible. The airplane-style cockpit was held in place loosely and would shear away if inverted to allow for tire contact.
A: If I have enough practice with the 'bot, the whole experience is transparent. I completely forget that I'm holding onto a transmitter or that I'm standing feet or yards away. Everything is pure reflex, just like I was in the arena.
A: The Gap as it appeared at Robot Wars was more of a pneumatic lifter than a 'flipper'. It did score the fastest knockout at RWEW2, and possibly the fastest ever at Robot Wars when it took out 'Trackzilla' in four seconds.
A: That information is classified -- although we do talk a bit about The Gap's weaknesses in a previous post in this section of the archive.
A: The best part was meeting other people who shared our interest in robots and competition. We made many good friends at Robotica.
It was also great fun to watch the production of a television show on a Hollywood sound stage. I hadn't realized how much effort went into making a television program.
A: Hmmm... how about 'Hit and Run'?
A: We do have some sumo designs drawn up, but the nearest competition is 250 miles away and runs once a year. Pretty small fun. If things pick up, we'll be there.
A: Our reasons for building combat robots are probably a little different than other teams. We like robots that are responsive to operate and that can do interesting things. We're also too empathetic to really enjoy highly destructive weapons that rip another team's robot apart. We've said before, we like to leave our opponents pretty - but beaten.
There are several robots on our drawing board that we'd really like to build:
A: In the main tournament we fought:
A: My dad and I started building combat robots in early 2001. We didn't know much about them when we started but, with the help of people who were very generous with their knowledge, we've done very well. We've built seven combat robots, won four competitions, and been in the top three at half the events we've entered. We fought at big, televised competitions (Robotica, Robot Wars) and smaller local, regional, and national events.
When we struggled to learn new things that were difficult to find information on, we wrote-up what we'd learned as guides for other robot builders (radio programming, PRO-120 speed controller set-up, combat robot gyros). We reviewed combat robot books, and compiled full tournament results from national and international combat robot competitions. We organized and maintain the Combat Robot Hall of Fame and we put on our own unique tournament -- three times. We've also researched the answers to more than 900 questions about combat robots. That all adds up to a considerable education.
A: Sorry, I can't find any connection between Team Gator's "Crockbot" and "Steel Magnolia".
A: Build reports are common features of combat robot team websites, although they vary a lot in detail and completeness. Start at Team Daisy and click on any of the 'build report' links for their robots. A web search for "build report robot" will find many, many more.
A: Mark J. here: Aaron has answered this question -- search this page for 'favorite'. I completely agree with Aaron's view.
While I'm on the topic: I think we would have better tournaments if we had fewer weight classes. Right now there are ten RFL-recognized classes:
I'd suggest a reduction to four weight classes: ant, hobby, light, and heavy. With fewer classes the existing builders would be concentrated for better competition and a cleaner tournament structure. It would also be easier for spectators to follow the progress of the tournament.
A: Robot Wars Extreme Warriors didn't get those introductions. The Gap is still combat-ready, so I'm not eager to talk weaknesses. Let's just say that the wheels could use some spinner protection -- that's what took us out of Robot Wars.
Strengths include precise maneuverability, a very long weapon reach, large CO2 and battery reserves, and bulletproof electronics.
A: Team Juggerbot is no longer competing in combat robotics, but they are busy with other robot projects.
A: Team Jawbreaker has retired from combat robotics. Here is a link to their archived site.
A: Tombstone last fought at the 2005 Robogames. Team Hardcore is still active, so I can only guess that they are having trouble finding other superheavyweights to fight. Dragging a superheavyweight around the country for just a couple of fights is just not worth the effort. You can contact the team and ask them directly.
A: Mark J. here: thank you -- I'm always pleased to receive comments and suggestions about the membership of the Combat Robot Hall of Fame. The hall opens for membership voting in August of odd-numbered years. The selection of robots isn't really 'mine' -- my vote counts no more than anyone else's -- but I did set out the original criteria for voters to consider. I suggested that membership be based on:
I can tell from your list that you value destructive force and unusual design in a robot, as do many fans. From a builder's point of view -- and most votes come from builders -- destructive ability and creative design may commonly be valued less than other aspects of a robot's performance. Noteworthy achievements in a single match make for good highlights in the membership notes but do not hold much influence in my own voting.
Here are my takes on your proposed members:
Shrederator (38 wins / 16 losses - ranked 5th historic) is certainly a contender for Hall of Fame membership and has received a few votes in past ballots. The value of having won the 2006 RFL heavyweight championship is reduced because only three robots participated in that contest. Worse, Shrederator is totally pwned by both 'Megabyte' and 'Sewer Snake' in head-to-head fights. No vote from me for now, but the tide could turn.
Cyclone (Unranked) had perhaps the most powerful vertical spinning disk weapon in the history of the sport. The weapon was, however, clearly derived from the pioneering design of hall of fame member 'Nightmare'. Aside from their well-earned victory in the RWEW Annihilator, their competition results were disappointing -- winning zero matches in open tournament competition. No vote from me.
259 (unranked) did win 'Best Design' at the 6th Wars, but it was not a design which proved to be 'influential'. Competition results were poor with an overall record of 1 win and 2 losses in head-to-head matches. I do believe the 'bot has fan and entertainment appeal, but there are several other Robot Wars 'bots ('Pussycat', 'Bigger Brother', 'Firestorm'...) I'd vote for before 259. No vote from me.
Dantomkia (seeded) is an agile and powerful competitor with a broad fan base. Performance in Robot Wars open tournament head-to-head matches was only fair: 4 wins and 3 losses. It failed to even come close to a major championship. A good robot, but no vote from me for the Hall of Fame. I'd much sooner see 'Firestorm' make full membership.
The Mortician (14 wins / 11 losses - ranked 100th) deals out damage, but is simply not a top-rank competitor. Absolutely no vote from me.
13 Black (seeded) is derivative of 'Hypno Disc' -- no points for adding on a second spinning disc to no good effect. Overall record in open tournament head-to-head is 3 wins / 3 losses. The robot had fan support, but then so did 'Plunderbird'. No vote from me.
The hall will open again for membership voting in August of 2009. You can certainly lobby on the forums for your favorite 'bots at that time and perhaps sway some votes to your favor.
A: Archived Rosie the Riveter website. Rosie was badly damaged at the Oregon Clandestine Street Fight, but was certainly repairable. That was the last I saw of her.
A: I think we'll have to call that a draw.
Juggerbot had us outweighed about 40:1, but we did get in the first hit. If their high-pressure flipper had been charged, we'd still be waiting for Mini Run Amok to come back down
Moral: don't bite off more than you can chew.
A: Tillah had a fearsome drum weapon, but its mobility was handicapped by the two-wheel drive system. It proved difficult to maneuver and was not successful in combat.
A: Yes. There were three JuggerBot platforms:
A: My last source of Robotica videos was inetvideo.com, but they seem to have run out. Keep an eye on EBay, and search YouTube.
Q: Ok, are there any videos of your robots in Robot Wars or Robotica on YouTube?
A: None that I know about.
A: Mark J. here: Team JuggerBot was one of the top technical teams in the sport and one of the finest groups of people I have ever met. Their robots were always prepared at the highest level and their pit skills were astounding.
JuggerBot 3.0 was one of the most capable combat robots of it's time. The addition of the high-pressure air 'Up Ender' weapon to the quick and agile JuggerBot platform created a (nearly) unbeatable machine. JuggerBot 2.0/Tricerabot was the first and only robot to shove the 1100 pound 'Sir Killalot' into the Robot Wars pit.
Rosie the Riveter/LogosEye was based on the original JuggerBot chassis used at Robotica. Operated by a separate team of members spun off from Team JuggerBot, Rosie continued development of armor and power from the original configuration and proved its durability by surviving a record ten fights at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors 2.
Q: How did 'LogosEye' come into existence? Why it isn't on the JuggerBot website?
A: The full story of 'LogosEye' and 'Rosie the Riveter' can be found at the archived LogosEye Website. 'LogosEye' was built for Robotica Series 3, but failed to perform to the expected standards of the associated JuggerBot teams. You can find a couple of pictures of it in the JuggerBot Robotica 3 gallery, but that's about it.
Q: What you think about RamForce? Jawbreaker? Viper? Panzer Mk. I? Kritical Mass?
A: I hope I don't have to go thru all the Robotica 'bots!
A: Tillah -- another JuggerBot spin-off -- was torn into tiny shards by Megabyte at Steel Conflict 4. There wasn't enough left to rebuild.
A: Run Amok was retired after her return from the second Robot Wars Extreme Warriors competition, but she remains fully operational in a place of honor in our workshop. You can find a listing of all of our combat 'bots down a little lower on this archive page.
A:Team Run Amok remains active in a variety of robotic projects, although it has been a while since we competed at an RFL event. Next month we will host an Antbotica competition here in Oregon, and we just got back from a trip Florida where we helped promote the new Slambot arcade game. We keep several of our 'bots in ready condition in case a opportunity pops up.
I loved the Robotica type, the robots had to be versatile and maneuverable. Driving skills played a big part of success or failure.
A: Hi, Matt. You build some great robots!
I like all styles of robot combat, but you've probably guessed that a 'Robotica' format is my favorite. It's a challenge to balance the design elements of the robot to meet all the differing tasks, and the driver has to stay cool and be ready to take advantage of any development. We like it so much that we designed our own Antbotica competition to include many of the same elements.
One thing I didn't like about Robot Wars -- we had to drive from a balcony a long way from the 'bot. I like to be close to the robot when I drive and I like to be able to hear the noise and feel the impact! That's what big 'bots are all about for me.
I also like what I've seen about autonomous sumo robot. I saw some great competition at Robothon and could really get into that if there were some local interest. Some of the guys at Western Allied Robotics have been building autonomous antweights and competing against R/C, but if anybody has a transmitter in their hands I want to have one too!
A: Mark J. here: 'Run Amok' was built for the unique demands of the original Robotica competition. It had the balance of speed, stability, power, and adaptability that was needed for that particular challenge.
We've built many robots since 'Run Amok'. For each different type of combat we build a very different type of robot. For Robot Wars, we built The Gap, which does not in any way resemble 'Run Amok'. The decision on self-righting would depend on the layout of the competition. 'The Gap' can self-right.
Television was only important to our robot combat career because it kept our expenses down. Building, transporting, and fighting heavyweight combat robots is expensive. The televised competitions would pay to transport us and the robots, put us up in a hotel, feed us, and usually pay enough prize money to cover our other expenses. Without that economic help, we've had to settle for smaller robots and 'local' competitions.
A: At Robotica, Run Amok was geared for speed and topped out at 17 m.p.h. For Robot Wars we increased the gear reduction for more pushing power and the top speed dropped to 12 m.p.h.
A: Pump the gas twice, depress the clutch, and turn the key to the right. See: #2.
A: Good to hear that you find the diagrams so useful. The Ask Aaron Archive had become a big page to load and I've just finished splitting it up into smaller sections. An 'all diagrams' section might be a good addition.
A: Mark J. here: The Combat Robot Hall Of Fame opens for new inductees in August of odd-numbered years. Votes for new members are solicited from the robot building community. As in prior years, the announcement and details of the voting process will be posted to combat robot related discussion groups at the Delphi Forums site. If you are an active member of the combat robot forums, you'll hear about it.
A: Thanks for the props. We really enjoy fielding robot questions and don't do it for recognition, but it's nice to hear that our efforts are appreciated.
A: We only answer robot questions here, so we'll have to modify your question: if a robot made of a carbonate ran into another robot made of an acid, you'd get a cloud of carbon dioxide and a puddle of water. Robot questions, please.
A: It's very tough to make a good case for a business to sponsor a combat robot right now. No TV coverage plus small audience turn-out at events means very few people would see a sticker on your 'bot or a banner in your pit area. Unless you're related to the owner of a business, you're going to find it very difficult to snag a sponsor. The only sponsor we've ever had is my dad's credit card.
Build a small 'bot with your own funds and enter a few tournaments. If you can show some skill and talent it will be easier to convince a potential sponsor to help you build a larger 'bot.
A: Robotics pioneer Joseph Engelberger once said: "I can't define a robot, but I know one when I see one."
A: Hypno-disc rocks, but my vote goes to Carlo Bertocchini's Biohazard. Twenty-seven wins and three losses is just impossible to beat. My beetleweight Zpatula is based on his electric lifter design, and Carlo was kind enough to autograph Zpatula for me at the 2004 RFL nationals.
Of the Robot Wars 'bots, I always liked Firestorm. Hypno-Disc beat Firestorm 3 in the 5th Wars, but it was a great fight!
I thought biohazard had five losses at: BBLV'99, BB1.0, BB3.0, and Combots cup 2005 (x2)?
I was counting the record at BattleBots, including melee wins. If you want to count the 2005 losses to Megabyte and Brutality, count the 2005 win over Jawbreaker and throw in the undefeated record at the early Robot Wars for an overall head-to-head record of 35 wins and 5 losses. That remains the best win percentage of any heavyweight with more than 10 fights.
A: Sure. Mini Max 2.0 uses the drivetrain from a BattleBots custom series 'DoAll' toy. I replaced the radio and speed controllers with hobby-grade equipment, and added a 700 MAH rechargeable battery pack. The treads are silicone rubber coated for added traction, and I added a removable front polyethylene scoop. The 'bot will run upside down if needed.
Mini Maxbot 2.0 placed second at the 2005 daVinci Days Antbotica event in Corvallis, Oregon.
A: You'll need more power and/or less weight and/or greater gear reduction and/or more traction. With the information you've given, my best advice is to build a combat robot and have it throw your model car over the hill. Robot questions, please.
A: There's a review of "Build your own combat robot" on the Team Run Amok book review page.
A: Try pointing it downhill. If that doesn't work, write back and tell me enough about your robot that I can make a reasonable suggestion.
A: Nobody was gonna beat 'Wallop' at the 2004 RFL National Championships. The magnet wheels gave him a huge advantage on the steel-floored arena. There is more to building a good magnet-bot than just bolting ring magnets onto your hubs, and Jim Smentowski did a great job of it.
On a non-magnetic surface, a 'Zpatula' versus rubber-tired 'Wallop' match would be interesting. I think my narrower lifter might get under his, but Jim is a very experienced driver. Call it a toss-up.
A: Zpatula is based on a BattleBots Pro-Series Biohazard R/C toy that I bought on EBay ($30). We removed the toy radio and installed a SOZBots ESC ($58), a Microbotparts FM micro receiver ($25), and a home-built 7.2 volt 700 mAH NiMHD battery pack ($10). The drive train uses the 130 size electric motors that came with the toy.
The toy gearbox for the lifter was modified to lock the slip clutch and to allow controlled up/down operation with a Team Delta R/C dual-ended switch ($39). We also upgraded the electric lifter motor from a 130 size to a more powerful 180 ($10). The lifter itself is a shortened BBQ spatula ($4).
For protection, we added 1/8" polycarbonate top armor ($3) and 3/16" UHMW polyethylene side/rear skirts ($3). Not counting the radio transmitter, that adds up to well less than $200.
Zpatula won the 2004 daVinci Days tournament and finished 3rd at the 2004 RFL nationals. It's lifetime ranking score at Botrank.com is a very respectable 1277.68.
You're Welcome. Your 'bots look great! Happy to hear our advice was helpful.
A: Yes. 'Mini Maxbot' was my first antweight. It is a converted R/C skateboard toy - four-wheel drive with dual 'forks of doom' on the front. It won the first Antbotica competition and won a few combat matches as well.
We still have all of our combat 'bots, although hobbyweight 'Nasty Glass of Water' is not operational.
A: Each of our 'bots at Robot Wars had its own driver and support team. We'd just go for it and see who had the better stuff that day. But no senseless destruction after the match was over!
A: I think I mentioned before that I had a grudge with Sir Killalot -- he attacked 'Run Away' without provocation and from behind. Cowardly! Dead Metal was my fave.
A: Yep, I own the game -- very cool! The housebots cannot be bought there, but you can play as a housebot in 'Robot Wars Advanced Destruction' for the Game Boy Advance.
A: Three reasons:
A: We don't need anything new at the moment, but we always have a couple things on the drawing board...
A: Take away its bus pass. [Sorry - couldn't resist the bad joke.]
Walking robots are for advanced robot builders and are much too complicated to talk about here. See earlier posts about walkers for some information sources.
Q: Do you have any more bad robot jokes?
A: Yes, but I don't want to drive people away from my website.
A: Didya run outta robot questions? My favorite color is green, my eyes are blue, I'm 6' 2" tall, my favorite musician is Ray Charles, my favorite class is Computer Aided Drafting, I like to eat pizza (no anchovies) and play Yu-Gi-Oh. I have two dogs, three birds, and a fish named 'Alpha'. More robot questions!
A: Tillah was very compact, but the Oregon drum spinner was a 220 pound heavyweight. The weapon was very heavy. You can see Tillah fight in the Oregon Clandestine Street Fight.
Q: How heavy is Tillah's drum?
A: Mark J. here: First, Tillah should be referred to in the past tense - Tillah is no more. As noted in an earlier post, Tillah was destroyed in a match against Megabyte at Steel Conflict 4.
I could only guess at the weight of Tillah's drum weapon. It was made from very thick steel plate. Ask Team JuggerBot for a definitive answer.
A: Mark J. here: The primary weapon of all the JuggerBots was speed and power. Juggerbot 2.0 was the 6-motor 6-wheel drive version that competed as a superheavyweight at BattleBots 3.0. It had no 'active' weapons, but did have a variety of interchangeable front-mounted spikes. This chassis also competed at Robot Wars, minus the two middle drive units, as 'Tricerabot'.
For JuggerBot 3.0, chief weapons officer Ron Ender developed the 'up-ender' weapon -- a small but mighty high-pressure air powered flipper to coordinate with the other attributes of the 'bot.
A: No. We didn't compete in any RFL qualifying events this year; we don't like their scoring system.
A: Yes, and no. Explanation:
The Gap's lifting platform has a max capacity of 1060 pounds, but you'd have to position the load very precisely on the platform to lift that much. The Gap will lift 400 pounds placed anywhere on the platform, and 616 would be very possible if we got well under the weight...
...but, Sir Killalot's true weight was almost double the advertised 616 pounds. Robot Wars didn't want to make it seem too one-sided.
A: Its shift key stuck on and it capitalized itself to death.
Actually, all of the old 'bots from the JuggerBot team are hanging on the wall of Mike Morrow's big workshop in Oregon. They're just bare chassis - all re-useable parts have been removed. The motor units from Tricerabot were used in Mike's full-scale 'Mars Rover' recreation. Cool!
Q: Why did Team JuggerBot's Mike Morrow build a giant mars rover?
A: Not giant, just full sized. The Mars Rover is much bigger than most people think! Mike built it for the 2004 daVinci Days festival in Corvallis, Oregon. He also arranged for truckloads of dirt and rocks to fill one end of a parking lot with a replica Mars crater. Visitors to the festival could drive the rover around the crater. Big fun!
A: Ask Team JuggerBot.
A: Mark J. here: The weapon and electronics changes to turn 'Run Amok' into 'Run Away' for Robot Wars Extreme Warriors cost about $1200. We also had to build a crate to ship Run Away to England.
'The Gap' was built in a big hurry for the second RWEW event, and I never added up all the receipts. I think an exact copy would cost about $4000.
A: About 208 pounds, with an empty CO2 tank.
A: Yea, it's a pun. Look up 'mettle'.
Q: I don't understand the 'mettle' pun.
A: Never try to explain a pun.
A: Chris Gattman, former member of Team JuggerBot and captain of Team Logoseye (Robot Wars: Rosie the Riveter, Robotica: Logoseye) is also the frontman for the hard rock band 'Logoseye'. I hadn't heard that they were giving out a robot trading card with CD purchase. Here's a list of all the robot cards in the series:
Q: How can I get the Team Death by Monkeys robot trading cards?
A: Write to them and ask nicely. Contact info is at their website: www.teamdeathbymonkeys.com.
A: On our first trip to Robot Wars we spent a lot of time on the London 'Underground' subway system. There were signs and a voice on the PA system reminding riders to 'mind the gap', which meant to look out for the space between the boarding platform and the train.
When we built our lifterbot for the next Robot Wars, it had a 'gap' between the raised lifter platform and the lower frame that could trap other 'bots. We thought it was only fair to point out that our opponents should mind The Gap.
A: Team Jawbreaker reports that Jawbreaker/General Chompsalot 3 has been ready for some time. Looks about ready to me: Photo.
Q: General Chompsalot 3 look's very heavy! Is it a superheavyweight?
A: No, GC3 was originally built to Robot Wars specifications -- 100 KG heavyweight.
A: I was in the Team JuggerBot workshop a few months ago and there was no sign of an upgrade to JuggerBot 3.0. Team leader Mike Morrow is working on other things.
A: No -- we designed our 'bots to fight other 'bots in our weight class, not the Housebots. We were happy to let other teams have a go at that!
A: Sure: www.ebay.com -- that's where I got mine.
A: We didn't fight 'Sir Forcealot' at RWEW2. 'Sir Forcealot' was a renamed version of our nemesis from Robotica, 'Ram Force'. The tournament trees didn't lead us into any of the same matches in England.
A: The robot combat community is a small one. Teams that compete in one series often show up at other events. We've met dozens of teams from BattleBots.
A: My mom is a big part of the team as well! She makes our travel and shipping arrangements, does most of our banners and graphics, and keeps us from doing anything stupid. That last part is really hard.
We also expanded our team for our second trip to Robot Wars to include our chief metal guy, Max Chapin and his family. Max does the metal forming and welding on our big 'bots and contributes to design and engineering.
A: We build 'bots to win matches, not destroy other 'bots.
A: Yes - 'Rat Amok' won the daVinci Days tournament, and 'Mini Maxbot' won the first Antbotica.
A: Mark J. here: This is a good time to tell the whole story. 'Nasty Glass of Water' was built for the September 2001 NERC Hobby Expo event in Chicago. I was sharing a hotel room with Team Delta's Dan Danknick at the event. Dan built a lightweight 'bot called 'Evil Fishtank' for BattleBots and I wanted to play on that name for my hobbyweight. What's smaller than a fish tank? A glass of water. What's a little less than evil? Nasty!
NGOW was an open 'dustpan' design powered by two very large automotive windshield wiper motors running at 24 volts. Even with the overvolting it was very slow, but it could really push! In our first match a motor capacitor failed and shorted to ground. The battery pack got so hot that I blistered two fingers prying it out of the 'bot. By the time I had the pack cooled down and the capacitor fixed, we'd missed our next match and were out.
The next day we were back for the hobbyweight 'rumble'. NGOW scooped up and trapped a 'bot called 'Green Dragon' that had a good bar spinner weapon still operational. With lots of pushing power and an effective weapon, the 24 pound NGOW/GD combo 'bot cleaned house! The unimaginative event director decided that a combo-bot wasn't quite legitimate and disqualified us, but the audience really loved it!
A: Here in the Pacific NorthWest robots larger than the 60 pound 'lightweight' class are getting pretty rare -- but we have a few:
A: Entry into the Robotica tournaments was by invitation only and winners weren't invited back. The producers were saving the winners from each season for a 'Challenge of the Champions' event that was to take place after a few more seasons had gone by. The ratings for seasons 2 and 3 fell off from the first season and the 'Challenge' tournament never happened. Rats!
A: Mark J. here: I've never published my journal from the second Robot Wars trip. I think you get most of the 'behind the scenes' flavor from the first journal, but I might reconsider.
There IS a Robotica Journal.
A: Mark J. here: Run Amok needed a little graphic impact to show up well on TV. My design, my decision.
A: Try emailing JuggerBot team captain Mike Morrow (mike@juggerbot.com) and asking nicely.
A: The Revolutionist was a VERY dangerous 'bot! The Gap and the Revolutionist met in the first round Robot Wars Extreme Warriors 2 in a 3-way fight with 'Trackzilla'. While the Revolutionist was spinning up, The Gap charged over and tossed Trackzilla on its top for the fastest K.O. by an American 'bot in Robot Wars history -- about 4 seconds! Just then the Revolutionist had a radio glitch and went out of control, smashing into the back of The Gap before shutting down. Both of us went on to the next round.
We didn't meet again. The Gap was designed to get under spinners with its long lifter platform, but the exposed wheels would make a tempting target for the Revolutionist. It would have been a good match -- not sure who would have won.
A: Not many large American 'bots have a dedicated SRiMech. Run Amok was originally built for the Robotica competition where there wasn't any real need for self-righting -- if you found yourself upside-down, there just wasn't time to self-right. I don't think any of the Robotica 'bots had SRiMechs, but some could run inverted.
When we went to Robot Wars for the first time, we didn't have enough time for major changes to Run Amok. We added the 'side-wheel' rotary weapon to make 'Run Away' showy and unique, and extended the top armor as far to the rear as the rules allowed to make her more resistant to flipping and more difficult for Sir Killalot to pick up (it worked!). That was a learning trip for us.
For our second trip to Robot Wars we built our own new flipper 'bot, The Gap. The Gap does self-right. We had a chance to take a second 'bot, so brought the battle-weary Run Away along as well.
As it turned out, Run Away never really needed a SRiMech. She ended up on her back a couple of times, but by the time that happened the match was already lost and self-righting wouldn't have made a difference.
A: Nobody's ever complained before! It's kind of a cluttered view that doesn't add much to the model. You can see the steel battery box hanging from the chassis, the differential/chain drive, a peak of the drive motor, and a glimpse of the speed controller cover. There is no rear armor.
Just to keep a fan happy, here's a special 'cut and paste' rear-view insert panel to complete your Run Amok model. Don't ask for a bottom view - ain't gonna happen.
A: Mark J. here: I've got CD video of Rat Amok at Da Vinci Days and in the antweight melee at BotBash. There isn't much to see; most times the trap snapping shut squirts the other 'bot across the arena like a pumpkin seed! Having only one shot is a problem in a melee fight.
The video files are too big to download. If you really want the video, send me your email and snailmail addresses and I'll see what I can do.
A: We won the televised Robotica competition with our first heavyweight -- Run Amok.
A: No need - the Team Run Amok website has all the info on our 'bots.
A: Nope. The last POP event was 3,161 miles from our workshop. That's a long way to go for an ant fight.
A: The Twin City MechWars is a great robot combat series! We've never competed at MechWars, but we were able to stop in at a builders' meeting and talk with some of the teams. If we lived closer to Minnesota we'd be regulars.
'Rat Amok' is operational, but has been retired because the servo drive is just too slow to compete with current speedy ants. I keep thinking about a new version with better motors. Maybe someday.
A: A picture and description of 'Rat Amok' is here - larger picture here.
A: We saw a UK antweight tournament at our first trip to Robot Wars in 2001. 'Mini Razor' wasn't there, but the full-size Razor was!
A: Team Run Amok never competed at BattleBots. It was too expensive, too crowded, and I'm told the food wasn't very good. After all the expense of building a 'bot and traveling to the event, half of the 'bots lost in the first round and went home. Pretty small fun.
A: Most schools (mine included) have very little money for such projects. We'll have to keep financing our own robots.
A: Sorry, but we don't use 3D modeling software for our 'bots. Try asking that question at the Delphi Forums RFL discussion.
A: Beats me. I don't.
Mark J. here: People fight robots for all sorts of reasons. Some people like to win matches -- they don't care what design that takes, and wedges are just fine in their book. Some builders just don't think that a wedge is the way robots should fight and like to show off their active weapons. They are embarrassed when they lose to a simple but well-built wedge, so they hate wedges. It's all a matter of taste. Build what you like.
A: My favorite part is hanging out in the pits and talking to other builders -- but you gotta build to fight, and you gotta fight to get into the pits. I guess I like it all.
A: My last event was daVinci Days last July (2005). I'm a high school freshman this year and don't have as much spare time as usual, but I plan to be back at daVinci Days again this summer and maybe another event or two.
A: The Ask Aaron site is getting a lot more traffic, but I don't think there's a link between that and combat robots heading back to TV. If there are new robot shows, they aren't going to be like what we've seen before! I promise I'll let you know if producers start calling.
A: None of the classes are pushovers anymore, but the level of destruction seems to go up with the heavier classes. I'd guess that the heavyweights are the most brutal class at the moment, but competition is tough all the way from antweights thru the super-heavys.
A: Tough question. I think the toughest 'bot I ever fought was the beetleweight Trilocity -- a high-power thwackbot. He put some rips in my armor and eventually stuck his axe into my chassis so hard he couldn't get loose. I had enough pushing power to drag him around and get enough points for the win.
A: Zpatula uses a Sozbots dual motor ESC, plus a Team Delta dual-ended R/C switch for the lifter motor. Zpatula isn't based on the small custom-series BattleBot toy chassis, it's built on the larger pro-series chassis, and it uses a modified Biohazard gearbox for the lifter.
A: Could. Won't.
A: The Gap fought two great matches at the 'Oregon Clandestine Street Fight'. Videos from that event are on My YouTube channel. The Gap also fought at Robot Wars Extreme Warriors II -- try searching for that.
I don't know of any fairy or flea matches for sale on video.
A: We were at the Robot Wars Extreme Warriors events in England twice. In 2001 we entered 'Run Away' and made it to the finals in the Tag Team competition with our friends from Team Jawbreaker. In 2002 we returned with 'Run Away' and 'The Gap' and fought in both the main tournament and the Tag Team event. I also got to drive 'Run Away' in the Nickelodeon Robot Wars series filmed in England in 2002.
A: Mark J. here: my retired antweight Rat Amok was made from a genuine Victor rat trap - larger than a mouse trap. The trap mechanism is fully functional and is controlled by a tiny servo that holds the trap open `til the weapon is fired. Rat Amok won the 2002 Western Allied Robotics daVinci Days antweight tournament. The servo drive is too slow to be competitive against faster modern `bots, but I keep thinking about a new, faster version.
Aaron had his own antweight back then called 'Mini Maxbot' that he and I built together. Aaron and Mini Maxbot won the first Antbotica competition in 2004.
A: The funniest robot I ever saw was `Psycho Chicken'. In one match at Robot Wars, it laid an egg that `hatched' into an R/C mini-bot. Funny!
A: Our team has both my dad's and my antweights on buildersdb.com -- along with my beetle, dad's hobbyweight, and our two heavyweights. Search for 'Run Amok' as a team name.
We haven't run antweights at an RFL qualifier for a few years now -- but I fought my beetle 'Zpatula' at nationals in 2004. It's ranked in the top 30 historic beetles at botrank.com.
A: Technical question - Mark J. here: I've gone into detail about the design decisions for Run Amok at the Run Amok FAQ page. In short, Run Amok was built for the four challenges in the first season of Robotica: The Speedway, The Maze, The Gauntlet, and The Fight to the Finish (details on the challenges). Tank steered robots have trouble making smooth turns as needed for The Speedway, and many had difficulty climbing ramps in The Maze. Also, a car-style differential as used by Run Amok can deliver a lot of pushing power in poor traction conditions for the Gauntlet.
I knew that the maneuverability of tank steering would be an advantage in The Fight to the Finish, but I wanted my best chance to at least get that far. It all worked out for us!
A: Yep, Zpatula has a lifter with a 4-bar linkage. Zpatula's drive motors are 6 volt Mabuchi 130s -- a Mabuchi 180 powers the lifter.
Q: Don't you think 130s are a bit small for a beetle? I use 300s in my ant. [Alex U., Pittsburgh, PA]
A: Mark J. here: Let me take this one, Aaron.
The maximum amount of drive power you can effectively use in a 'bot is limited by the weight on the drive wheels and the grip of the tires. Additional torque just spins your wheels. You can 'gear up' to trade torque for speed -- but how much speed can you effectively use in a 5 or 6 foot square ant/beetle arena?
Zpatula is 6-wheel drive and can easily spin it's wheels to avoid motor-destroying stall. The twin, mildly over-volted 130 motors give good controllable speed and deliver about 4 watts of power per pound of robot -- just about the same ratio as our Robotica winning heavyweight 'Run Amok'.
Many People believe that Team Run Amok's 'bots are underpowered, but we have championships from half the events we've entered. Not many teams can match that record.
A: No question about it, I like heavyweights! There's just something about the noise and feel of two BIG 'bots crashing into each other that you don't get in the lighter classes.
A: Well, homework and my household duties do take a lot of time. When I'd done with them, I decide what I really should be doing -- an hour watching a TV show I don't really care about is an hour I could have been working on a robot, practicing my basketball, or preparing my Yu-Gi-Oh decks. If you really look at what you do with your spare time, you might be surprised at how much you could be doing. Remember to save some time to just kick back!
A: I count seven competition robots in all:
A: Sure! I play basketball, I have a weekly Yu-Gi-Oh tournament, and I'm an assistant manager for my high school football team.
A: All of my 'bots are built for combat or head-to-head competition. No humanoid 'bots -- but I think that 'bots like Robo-One are way cool!
A: By the time we're thru with a robot it's either a champion or a pile of scrap. We don't sell our champions, and nobody would want the pile of scrap.
A: We made lots of friends at Robotica and I don't want to pick out just one 'bot as my favorite. I really liked JuggerBot, Jawbreaker, and Kritical Mass. My dad says he liked Pandora for the cool way the builder used the parts he had available.
< name="RA2">
A: Propellerhead hit one of The Gap's wheels so hard it broke the gearbox. That was a freak hit and we haven't had any trouble since then, but before The Gap competes again, there will be wheel guards! We have plenty of weight allowance left.
[Drawing of 'Run Amok 2' by A.J. Hamilton]
A: Yes! Combat robots are very dangerous -- that's why they usually fight inside bulletproof plastic boxes. Most robot builders have a scar someplace that their robot gave them. You must be very careful when working with rotating weapons, exposed gears and chains, high-pressure pneumatic systems, and heavy 'bots running around at speed.
A: The last match of Robotica happened at about 3 o'clock in the morning. It was a very busy day and I was really tired. The photo was taken in the pits after our win, and I was about half asleep.
A: There are a couple of 'bots I'd like another chance to fight, but not exactly for revenge. Sir Killalot did try to throw us out of the arena for no reason, and I'd love to catch him with his back turned for a little payback. We didn't really have much of a chance to battle with General Chompsalot 'cause we were so badly damaged in an earlier fight -- I'd like to do that again.
Q: But I thought you & General Chompsalot were Tag team terror partners, you've even got his link on your web page. So why do you want to battle him?
A: Yes, the guys on Team Jawbreaker are our friends. They are really nice guys. We met them at Robotica and we were tag team partners at Robot Wars. When we met them in a battle at the next Robot Wars, Run Away had been badly damaged in an earlier match by Destructive Criticism and we just couldn't show off much. General C. even had to grab us and pull us away from the house 'bots to save us!
Fighting robots is fun. You play baseball and football with your friends, so why not battle robots with them?
This section is tucked away and not listed on the main page because, with few exceptions, I'm not really willing to answer technical questions about Robot Arena 2. Try these other resources first:
Q: This is more of an FYI than a question, the RA2 community has long since moved to Gametechmods - the old RA2 Forums are no longer in existence.
PS: You can download the DSL-TC mod that was made for making bots that could work in real life. Just make sure you download it correctly, or face the wrath of ACAMS.
Thank you, R1.
A: Thanks, R1.
A: I'm referring all RA2 questions to gametechmods. Check their wiki and forum.
A: I'm referring all RA2 questions to gametechmods. There is a decal tutorial in their wiki and help in their forum.
A: I don't think I can say I ever was much a part of the Robot Arena 2 online community. I never entered a tournament and only made a couple posts to the old discussion board -- but I do still like to play the game.
Q: Did you see the new replica of 'Run Away' someone made on RA2?
A: I've seen the Run Away replica made by Sonny Resetti -- I don't know why he didn't start with the existing Virtual Run Amok. If there is a newer replica then no, I haven't seen it.
Q: Sonny is known as the 'Replica Master' in the RA2 community. With the new components, he wanted to start from scratch. Do you like the new replica?
A: I think it's great that there's still enough interest in the 'old robots' that people continue build virtual replicas. Sonny makes some very fine replicas.
A: I've played quite a bit of 'Robot Arena: Design and Destroy', but my favorite PC robot game is 'Robot Wars - Extreme Destruction'. My dad has a virtual version of our robot 'Run Amok' for Robot Arena. You can download it here: Virtual Run Amok.
A: I guess you found our Virtual Run Amok for Robot Arena 2. The mechanical components available in the game are not well suited for building an accurate model of the chain-driven 'paddlewheel' spinner weapon on Run Away or the multi-pivot pneumatic platform on The Gap. You might get them functionally operable, but they wouldn't look right.
A: I like to play with 'Tail Whip' in the lightweight class. With a little practice and strategy, it can be a very effective 'bot. I agree that 'Coal Miner' is the toughest computer 'bot to beat.
A: I'm not active on the Robot Arena forum, and did not enter the tournament.
A: The basic shape of the robot body doesn't have to be a rectangular box. The first step in chassis layout sets the size and shape of the base plate. Click on 'Step 2' to set the top plate, click on a front corner, and pull it toward the rear to make it smaller than the bottom plate. Repeat with the other front corner. Instant wedge!
A: I stay away from Robot Arena tech questions, but I'll make an exception this time.
Motors cannot be mounted directly to the baseplate in a horizontal orientation. You must make a motor mount that provides a mounting surface at a right angle to the baseplate. The mount may be made from an angled base and extenders. The motor will snap to the mount when brought close and may then be rotated into position with the shift/mouse combination. See the diagram at right for examples.
A: The tutorial files included on the program disk have the basic information you're asking about. For additional help with Robot Arena 2, use the resources at the top of this section. |