Questions and Answers about Combat Robotics from Team Run Amok.

A: [Mark J.] If the silicone rubber is coming off in 'chunks' you're putting it on too thick. Clean the foam tires vigorously and throughly -- I use lighter fluid and a rag. Allow to dry completely. Apply pure silicone sealant to the tire surface and squeegee the sticky goo around the circumference with a popcicle stick or knife blade, applying very firm pressure. The silicone layer should be no thicker than a coat of paint and the texture of the foam should show thru. Wipe any excess from the tire sidewalls with a rag. Allow to cure for several hours (or days) before use.

I prefer silicone rubber, but many builders use liquid latex 'skin paint'. The technique is to first coat the tire with craft rubber cement. When the rubber cement dries you apply a couple coats of the latex.

A: [Mark J.] The information I have on safe arena construction can be found in Frequently Asked Questions #38.

A: [Mark J.] Yes, that's a very dense and 'busy' illustration that was pulled straight from a CAD cross-section view. I've taken a shot at stripping it down to the key elements:

A: [Mark J.] Can you name a Mecanum-wheeled combat robot with a winning record? The closest I can come is superheavyweight 'Alcoholic Stepfather' with a 5 win / 5 loss record. They managed to get pretty good traction, but their custom wheels cost $1000 each and were regularly destroyed in combat.

The problems associated with Mecanum wheels go far beyond traction. Here's what the Stepfather team had to say about them in a 2015 Reddit post:

A: [Mark J.] Did I really say that? A pneumatic system can deliver a great deal more speed and power to a hammer or lifter weapon than a direct-acting electric system -- but they are also a great deal more complex and dangerous. Whether they are 'the way to go' depends on your experience in building combat robots, expertise in metalworking, access to a machine shop, and expectations of performance.

1. Take a look at the Team DaVinci Guide to Understanding Pneumatics for an overview of the combat robot pneumatic systems. Also check with the organizers of any events where you wish to compete for special tournament rules and restrictions on pneumatic systems.
2. Search the Ask Aaron Ants, Beetles, and Fairies archive for 'pneumatic' to find dozens of earlier posts on insect class pneumatic systems. You'll find some alternatives with that same search.
3. There have been many pneumatic beetles, ants, and even fairies, but there is no 'off-the shelf' set of components currently available that will work for insect-class combat robots. You'll need to carefully modify existing pieces or make your own -- not a simple task and not for the inexperienced.
4. You can download the Team Run Amok Electric Hammer Spreadsheet and model the performance of an electric hammer sized for your 'bot -- but you'll find that the destructive energy available from such systems is disappointingly small compared to other weapon choices. A pneumatic hammer would be more powerful, but would still fall well short of other weapons.

Q: A robot that has fascinated me and a design I can’t recall being repeated was that of 'LOLCano V' (as it’s called on BuildersDB). One thing that isn’t really explained, however, is how exactly they managed to get both the drivetrain and the weapon to move on the same axle. What are some ways to accomplish this, and what am I missing with these designs that I’m most likely overlooking?

I know this design is one that’s probably better suited to show off than to be competitive, but it’s one that I enjoy and would like to put my own spin on... whenever I get around to doing so. [Joliet, Illinois]

A: [Mark J.] 'LOLCano V' (fight video) is not a unique design. It's a eggbeater variant of a "full-body drum spinner" (FBDS) of which there are several well-known examples:

• Derek Zahn competed successfully with ant and hobbyweight versions of his FBDS 'Daffodil' at NERC events in the early 2000's;
• Team Anomoly campaigned an antweight FBDS 'Tumbleweed' at NERC events in 2005-6;
• Team Rotractor's heavyweight FBDS 'Barber-ous' fought at Robot Wars series 5 thru 7; and
• Team KurTrox's 2019 BattleBots heavyweight 'Axe Backwards' is a FBDS.

You're having trouble figuring out the 15-pound 'LOLCano V' because:

1. The builders got carried away with their design software and made it overly complex; and
2. The render left off key pieces (like wheels, hubs, and belts) and included extra stuff that didn't make it onto the finished 'bot.

Here's how it works:

• There is a solid, structural 'dead shaft' running thru the robot and terminating on either end at a squared wheel guard plate that prevents shaft rotation.
• The internal chassis is mounted to that shaft and does not rotate.
• Chassis-mounted gearmotors belt-drive long hex-ended wheel hubs that rotate freely on the dead shaft.
• The belt-driven beater-bar rides on bushings that bear on the round-section portion of the extended wheel hubs.

Summary There is a 'dead shaft' with wheel hubs rotating on it, and rotating independently against the outside of the wheel hubs are bushings supporting the beater bar. Very messy.

In a more common FBDS design layout as used by 'Daffodil' (archived build report):

1. There is no continuous shaft thru the robot -- a structural chassis fits inside the drum and carries wheel and weapon forces.
2. The drum rides on bearings supported by hollow 'stub' axles on either end of the chassis and is powered by a friction drive wheel running against the inside of the drum.
3. The wheels are powered by chassis-mounted gearmotors with shafts extending thru the hollow stub axles to the wheel hubs.
4. The stub axles also support one or more firmly mounted arms that press against the arena surface to prevent the chassis from spinning around inside the drum.

See this Full Body Drum Spinner post in the Ask Aaron Archives for a photo and description of the layout of 'Barber-ous'. The chassis shown there is unusual in that it has the drive motors mounted externally on the trailing arms with the wiring running to the chassis thru the stub axles. Later versions of 'Barber-ous' moved the drive motors to more common internal mounts on the chassis.

Q: In that "Actual" pic of "LOLcano" it looks like the wheels don't even touch the ground. Am I seeing that right? [Wellesley, Massachusetts]

A: [Mark J.] No wheels are shown in either the 'Rendered' or 'Actual' pics of 'LOLcano V'. Large diameter wheels mount to the hexagonal section hubs you can see in the 'actual' pic, and square guards then mount to the shaft outside the wheeels. I've added a screen grab labeled 'Complete' that shows the whole robot.

A: [Mark J.] I wasn't trying to be cryptic. I've covered specific transmitter tweeks that can help with straight tracking in assorted posts and radio articles and I assumed that I'd tied them all together in a single place. Apparently that is not the case, so I've created a new transmitter guide covering this topic:

A: [Mark J.] The Lemon receiver and your Turnigy transmitter operate in the same frequency range, but they speak different languages.

• Your Endbots Lemon RX DESC requires a transmitter operating on the DSM2 radio protocol;
• Your Turnigy transmitter sends signals in a 'flavor' of the AFHDS protocol that is compatible only with the HK-T6Av2 receiver.

Q: I'm building a featherweight with RS-775 motors and banebots gearboxes. I'm looking for cheap brushed motor controllers rated for 130 amps and 36 volts. Can you help? [Social Media]

A: [Mark J.] The bad news is that there are no cheap brushed motor controllers with those specs. The good news is that you've made some bad assumptions in designing your drivetrain and don't need those specs.

• An RS-775 motor can draw as much as 130 amps at 18 volts when stalled -- but a properly geared featherweight drivetrain will never come close to stalling its drive motors. With a 20:1 gear reduction and 3" wheels, the Tentacle Torque Calculator shows a peak current draw per motor of less than 13 amps.
• At higher voltages the stall current for the RS-775 motor rises. At 36 volts the stall current rises to 260 amps, but the RS-775 motors are not suitable for use at 36 volts. They also will not survive long at current draws much above 25 amps.

I would be comfortable running motor controllers in the true 30-40 amp continuous range, and at no more than 24 volts. You should have no difficulty finding controllers with those specs.

Q: I've read posts where you recommend twin stick transmitters over pistol grip transmitters for "very good reasons". What are the very good reasons? I always thought it was more personal preference than one was actually better than the other. I initially used twin sticks but found it frustrating as I couldn't go exactly straight forward or backwards without turning a little bit when driving a two wheeled bot. [Denver, Colorado]

A: [Mark J.] Builders inexperienced with the full range of control options available on an aircraft radio may well believe that any radio that they can slap a steering/throttle mix onto is going to be just fine for their 'bot. In the heat of a fight with some adrenaline pumping, they find their 'bot quite difficult to control: start speed motor differences, over-correcting on steering, trouble carving a smooth turn, and (yes) weaving along a straight line. They start to think they aren't good drivers, when the problem actually lays in their equipment and setup.

The requirements for precise control of a differential-steer robot are much closer to the requirements for control of a fixed-wing aircraft than those needed for a car or boat. Just having sticks instead of a knob/trigger won't make you a better driver, but the suite of settings that come with a good twin-stick aircraft transmitter certainly can -- if you're willing to learn what they do and how to apply them. You'll also have a much larger pool of users to help with any difficulties you encounter, and a greater selection of transmitters and receivers. You'll also pay less for equivalent quality equipment.

If you're having trouble getting a twin-stick transmitter set-up to your liking, I'll be pleased to help.

A: [Mark J.] You're correct, the transmitter mix troubleshooting protocol likely won't sort out your tinyMixer without causing invert function problems. This alternate protocol will do the trick with your tinyMixer:

• The tinyMixer 'LR' lead must be plugged into the steering channel port on the receiver (Ch1 for an Elevon mix).
• The tinyMixer 'FB' lead must be plugged into the throttle channel port on the receiver (Ch2 for an Elevon mix).

Q: I'm flying to my first combat tournament as a competitor in a couple weeks. How do I pack my beetle and tools to pass security and get onto the plane? Checked baggage? Carry on? Do I need some sort of permit? [Columbus, Ohio]

A: [Mark J.] It's not terribly difficult to fly in the US with a small 'bot. No special permit is needed. The items you'll travel with fall into three categories:

1. Items that MUST be in checked baggage:
   Includes all sharp edged tools, any tool longer than seven inches, your 'bot if it looks dangerous, and liquids/gels/aerosols in volumes greater than 100 ml.
2. Items that MUST be carried in the cabin:
   For our purposes this is primarily lithium batteries not in a personal electronic device. Your 'bot does not qualify as a PED so pull the lipo from your checked 'bot and pack it and spares in your carry-on bag. Tape over the connectors just in case the TSA is being picky that day. You may carry any number of batteries up to 100 watt hours each, and most airlines will allow two larger lithium batteries (up to 160 watt hours) in addition to the smaller ones. For reference, a 2000 mAh 4s lipo is less than 50 watt hours. FAA Lithium Battery Guidelines
3. Items that may be either checked or carried:
   Small tools, battery chargers, radio gear, most spare parts, your harmless-looking robot. You've most likely got a checked bag with some items in it, so you might as well pack the rest. Most airlines allow a 'personal item' to be carried aboard in addition to your carry-on bag. Some builders like to carry their transmitter as their personal item.

A: [Mark J.] A London fanboy... You'll be after pics from the 1997 UK Robot Wars -- 'cause London fanboys refuse to acknowledge that there ever was a 1997 US Robot Wars (video).

The archived Tectonic Robot Wars site has a complete set of competitor photos from the 97 UK series. Click the show number links to get to the photos.

Please Note 'Ask Aaron' does not generally answer questions about UK Robot Wars (reason). I've made an exception in this case to encourage interest in the early history of robot combat.

New! Run Amok 4-Bar Lifter Spreadsheet

The T.i. Combat Robotics 4-Bar Simulator was an awesome design tool... until Windows abandoned its version of Visual Basic and it stopped working. There was no joy in Mudville.

I grew tired of this situation and started development of a replacement tool in a format that isn't likely to lose support: an Excel spreadsheet. Several months and a couple of beta versions later it's ready for a full release. The new Run Amok 4-Bar Lifter spreadsheet calculates and graphically displays the range of motion and torque requirements for front-bar and rear-bar torque-powered 4-bar lifter designs. The user interface will be familiar to users of the T.i. simulator, and the graphic outputs are directly comparable.

Run Amok 4-Bar Lifter Spreadsheet

---

Q: How to customise the starter motor of 3000 cc car? [Uttar Pradesh, India]

A: [Mark J.] I'd chrome it and add some pin stripes. मैं भारत के लड़ाकू रोबोटों के बारे में पूछे गए सवालों के जवाब नहीं देता.

---

Q: Hey Guys:

With tip speed limits being imposed on the higher classes and at times the lower ones I feel like super high speed robots that go fast for the purpose of going fast are very rare. What is the fastest weapon tip speed that has been hit in combat robotics, I assume that it would be an insect weight robot. Has anyone ever hit Mach 1? There would be no point in going this fast other than for the show and an impact with anything at this speed would certainly be robot suicide but damned if I dont want to hit a sonic boom.

Interested to hear your take. [Ontario, Canada]

A: [Mark J.] Tip speed limits are all based on 'theoretical' calculated values that do not account for aerodynamic drag. At low speeds these calculated estimates aren't too far off, but as speeds rise they become increasingly optimistic.

Unlike bearing and belt drag, aerodynamic losses are exponential. When you double the speed of a spinning weapon it must push twice the volume of air out of the way per unit of time, and it must move each unit of air twice as quickly. This means that aero drag increases with the cube of speed.

By the time you reach transonic speed you've got a mountain of pressure drag to overcome and the simple tip speed calculation is meaningless. I know of a few 'bots that have claimed calculated supersonic tip speed, but very few builders go to the effort of actually measuring true speed. Whos's actually fastest? No way to tell.

About Sonic Booms - A 'sonic boom' is not a noise made by an object when it 'breaks' the sound barrier. Any object travelling thru air faster than the speed of sound creates a pressure wave in front of itself that travels along with that object. As the object passes your loction that pressure wave and the low pressure zone immediately behind it strike you, creating the 'boom'. If you could achieve a weapon tip rotating at the speed of sound it would strike you with a small pressure wave on every rotation, resulting in a loud 'sonic siren' -- not a boom.

Q: I audibly went "ooooo" when I read the words "sonic siren", its too bad I can't seem to find a good video of a similar stationary sonic boom effect. I feel that losses at supersonic speed would be massive. I'm certain there is very little information on the kinda effects a 3ibs supersonic spinner would face however in your professional guess is there a ball park efficiency loss I should aim for? Does the AskAaron spinner calculator factor in for any efficiency losses already?

I've calculated that with a 60% efficiency loss I should be able to hit 767mph if I run a fat brush less motor at a 0.5:1 overdrive. The idea would be to use a disengagable brushed motor to get the spinner up to a speed before the brush less motor can take over.

The robot would be startlingly noncompetitive I'm sure but I gotta see what this sonic siren sounds like now! Hopefully it won't kill itself until after it hits the magic speed.

You provide a ridiculously large service to people in the combat community and I really do appreciate that. Cheers

A: I do admire enthusiasm, but as part of my 'service to the combat community' I am required to throw a few roadblocks in your path.

1. The Ask Aaron Spinner Calculator does not factor in aerodynamic drag.
2. Give a little thought to "aero drag increases with the cube of speed". To double tip speed requires [2³ =] eight times as much power. If you have a weapon that requires 100 watts of motor power to overcome aero drag at 100 MPH tip speed, pushing to 200 MPH would take 800 watts of motor power...
   100 MPH = 100 watts

   200 MPH = 800 watts

   400 MPH = 6400 watts

   800 MPH = 51,200 watts

   We've gone from about 1/8^th horsepower to overcome aero drag at 100 MPH to about 70 horsepower at 800 MPH. Bummer.
3. That 767 MPH number you're aiming for is relative to the surrounding air. An airplane screaming along at 800 MPH relative to the ground is not breaking the 'sound barrier' if it has a 50 MPH tail wind. A spinning weapon is going to create a serious air vortex spinning along with it, so hitting an RPM mark that will give transonic tip speed relative to the robot will still not get you your 'sonic siren' because of the self-created tailwind from the weapon.

Comment: Well I'm kind of sad to learn there wont be a sonic siren even if I can hit 767mph. I appreciate you bringing these up as they are important considerations. While it sounds like hitting a super sonic siren is out of the question the engineering challenge of designing a supersonic spinner is still very tantalizing. I'll look into using the most aerodynamically efficient blade I can and see if I can hook up 2 massive brushless motors plus a kick starting disengagable brushed to the weapon to overcome the massive cubed losses. Can't wait to find out what kind of physics gyro BS happens at massively high speeds. Time to talk to some overhead builders :P . Thanks for the advice guys!

Response: See if you can talk an event organizer into some special arena conditions. If you can pump the air pressure down to the equivalent of 60,000 feet and reduce the temperature to 216 Kelvin, air resistance is greatly reduced and Mach 1 drops to 573 knots -- but I suspect this only works with spherical chickens.

---

Remembering Aaron Joerger, 1991 - 2013 The 'Ask Aaron' project was important to Aaron, and I continue the site in his memory. Thank you for the many kind messages of sympathy and support that have found their way to me. Aaron's obituary - Mark Joerger

Q: how can robots help us deal better with hurricanes and why? [Ontario, California]

A: [Aaron] Few people in Nebraska are threatened by hurricanes, so send a swarm of killer robots into low Atlantic and gulf coastal areas to drive the puny human inhabitants toward Nebraska. Problem solved.

Robot haiku:

That's obviously A question from your homework. Do your own research.

Aaron's Greatest Hits! More of Aaron's Poems Aaron's Minecraft High Dive Video Aaron's World of Warcraft Player Guide

---

We welcome combat robot questions. Please search the Ask Aaron Archives first to see if we've already answered your question. Recent Q&A are posted above. Type your question in the box, attach files if needed, then click: 'Send' or Attach: Why is there a 'Cheerleader' button?

---

Thousands more robot combat questions and answers in the searchable Ask Aaron archives.

---

Copyright 2009, 2019 by Mark Joerger All rights reserved.

how to design and build a battlebot